Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:12 PM Mar 2014

Winners and losers of FA? (So far)

Winner: my jags (yes I'm biased and loving it). Great work revamping the d-line. Good resigning with Henne. Gerhart a running back. Couple of solid o-line moves


Loser: Raiders and jets are too easy. I vote for the cowboys. Three reasons: ware, ware and ware.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Winners and losers of FA? (So far) (Original Post) Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 OP
I'm not too certain about Ware for the Cowboys. TexasTowelie Mar 2014 #1
Fair, but Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 #2
Letting Ware go to free agency gave the Cowboys $7.4 million in additional room under the salary TexasTowelie Mar 2014 #3
Fair points. Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 #4
Denver, Seattle FA jim601 Mar 2014 #5
Denver cannot be denied. Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 #6

TexasTowelie

(116,809 posts)
1. I'm not too certain about Ware for the Cowboys.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:32 PM
Mar 2014

He is aging, on the downslide and quite expensive. They opened up several million dollars by making the trade.

Picking up Henry Melton for DT was a plus for them (and I better say that since I'm living in Grapevine where Melton went to high school).

The Cowboys also picked up Brandon Weeden as a backup quarterback which is a great move considering the age of Romo and Orton.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
2. Fair, but
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:34 PM
Mar 2014

Ware was cut not traded, though I think he was very late in his contract so the dead money should be minimal.

But when you got 100,000 seats to fill weeden and Milton aren't gonna fill them.

Weeded is also 30 I think. He was a 28 y/o rookie.

TexasTowelie

(116,809 posts)
3. Letting Ware go to free agency gave the Cowboys $7.4 million in additional room under the salary
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:00 PM
Mar 2014

cap, so it was a significant move. Since the Cowboys don't play Denver during the regular season this fall, the only way they might regret the decision this year is if both teams make it to the Super Bowl. The fact that they were willing to put Ware on free agency and pick up Melton meant that they had doubts about Ware's prognosis.

As far as bringing in the fans, Melton went to high school about 20 miles away from AT&T Stadium and also went to the University of Texas. Drawing an audience to the stadium is much more dependent on whether the Cowboys are having a successful season than it is on the individual efforts of a defensive player on the team. The fans didn't stop attending the games when Ware was injured after all. BTW, I saw Melton play a couple of high school games when he was a running back and he does generate crowd excitement with his high-step runs and overall speed.

You are correct about Weeden's age, but fortunately the Cowboys only signed a two-year contract. Orton is still undecided about whether he will retire, although he would have to pay back a substantial part of his bonus (I read it was over $2M).

As the old saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding" so we'll have to wait to the fall to find out whether any of these trades actually matter.

 

jim601

(17 posts)
5. Denver, Seattle FA
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 03:09 PM
Mar 2014

Denver is a winner too. They went all out to compete with Seattle next year. DeMarcus Ware and Aqib Talib got signed.

Seattle lost Browner, Bryant, and Tate...

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»Winners and losers of FA?...