Sky Cam is fine when used as an occasional shot and for highlights, but not as the primary view.

Madden and Fantasy Football have already degraded the enjoyment of the game, this is just another nail in the coffin.

here have, I'm sure...change is so hard for some - I loved it..count me in...

It was so cool to be in the huddle, back out of huddle to be over the line viewing the defense just like the QB, watching the play unfold, following the pass or run to the whistle blow.

Then - the skycam followed the players, wandered over to the sideline above them, up into the crowd, back down to the huddle...so cool!

You could see the water droplets on their helmets, their wet uniforms, their bodies wet - you could really "feel" the game!

Count me in, too!

other than my pick winning...in my football pool...I know I saw all these things you describe...and here I was focused on the end game...especially your last paragraph...(btw, I'm a 70 year old woman....) fire away......

Back to familiar camera angles, please.

It lets me see the whole play as it develops. Passing lanes show up, blocking schemes are no longer a muddle from the side. It certainly seems more informative and I feel more engaged.

I agree with those who have said they wished the angle started wider, so the outside receivers are visible before zooming in.

BUT it does take more attention to see things happen, since the camera angle isn't helping you out much. So for the sitting back and relaxing times, like with a game that's "just on" instead of one of interest to me (although, being a Bears fan, this is tough sometimes...), I'd probably prefer the sideline.

Since it seems, however, that practically every play these days gets an instant replay, at least when not in no-huddle mode, why not simply show both by default?