Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

True Dough

(20,012 posts)
Tue Nov 27, 2018, 12:23 PM Nov 2018

Forcing child into sex act wasn't indecent assault in the 1970s, Aussie priest's lawyer argues

Peace be with you, father. Go forth and prosper! I mean, rot in hell, you miserable SOB!!



Lawyers appealing former archbishop of Adelaide Phillip Wilson's conviction for covering up child abuse have argued that convincing a child to perform a sex act did not constitute indecent assault in the 1970s.

Wilson was convicted in May of concealing the indecent assault of a boy by paedophile priest Jim Fletcher in the Hunter region of NSW.

The court found that in 1976 the victim confided in Wilson that he had been sexually abused, yet Wilson failed to report it to police when Fletcher was charged with other child sex offences in 2004.

Wilson is currently serving a minimum sentence of six months' home detention, but is persisting with an appeal of his conviction.



https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-11-27/former-archbishop-phillip-wilson-appeals-conviction/10559390
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forcing child into sex act wasn't indecent assault in the 1970s, Aussie priest's lawyer argues (Original Post) True Dough Nov 2018 OP
So, he isn't denying having covered it up. Mariana Nov 2018 #1
At least he has no shortage of believers making apologies for him Major Nikon Nov 2018 #2
Just six months of home detention? marylandblue Nov 2018 #3
He was just, you know, helping the lad find his way... MineralMan Nov 2018 #4
They'll do ANYTHING but take responsibility. trotsky Nov 2018 #5
Worse, they don't understand that is why they fail. MineralMan Nov 2018 #6
Seems to be a popular argument with religionists Major Nikon Nov 2018 #7

Mariana

(14,965 posts)
1. So, he isn't denying having covered it up.
Tue Nov 27, 2018, 12:45 PM
Nov 2018

He's arguing that covering it up was a good and righteous thing to do. All righty then.

MineralMan

(147,334 posts)
4. He was just, you know, helping the lad find his way...
Tue Nov 27, 2018, 01:13 PM
Nov 2018

And he ended up being promoted to be an Archbishop, to boot.

Asshole. Harming innocent children in the name of Jesus. Too bad Hell doesn't exist...

MineralMan

(147,334 posts)
6. Worse, they don't understand that is why they fail.
Tue Nov 27, 2018, 01:56 PM
Nov 2018

So, the ancient hierarchy keeps doing what it has always done. Massive amounts of inertia are involved - so much so that changing direction or speed has become impossible at this point.

The RCC Train is on a steep downgrade and the brakes failed ages ago. If you're there, get away from the tracks.

Major Nikon

(36,899 posts)
7. Seems to be a popular argument with religionists
Wed Nov 28, 2018, 11:48 AM
Nov 2018

Just the other day one floated the idea that just because someone is a rapist and a wife beater, doesn't mean they can't provide inspiration against sexual harassment.

All it really does is underscore the problem with organized religion. Religionists have the unshakeable idea that religion is always a force for good, which is why they are driven to apologia for even the worst of it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Forcing child into sex ac...