Religion
Related: About this forumSecular saints, folk saints and plain old celebrities
From the article:
But among those we also prayed for was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and for all the other saints ...
If youre looking for more politically loaded saints, the online handcraft marketplace Etsy has plenty of sellers hawking progressive saint candles depicting St. Barack Obama, St. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Robert Mueller and even Notorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg, heralded as the angel of everlasting dissent.
To read more:
https://religionnews.com/2019/01/31/secular-saints-folk-saints-and-plain-old-celebrities/
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Hammers are religious. Sandwiches are religious. My irrational fear of wicker furniture is religious. If writing articles about religion is your thing, it sure helps to have such a deep well from which to draw your inspiration, I guess.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)When everything is religious, then nothing is.
Bretton Garcia
(970 posts)... everything looks like a nail.
Reminds me of some president too. Hammering constantly.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)We're supposed to be building bridges with that president, BG! Guillaumeb is very disappointed that we aren't reaching out more to Republicans.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)MineralMan
(147,334 posts)Yes, indeed!
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Even to the ".." response that you excel at.
MineralMan
(147,334 posts)Doesn't seem interesting to me...
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)MineralMan
(147,334 posts)You might try harder.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)I am curious to know.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)and obviously both feel that their behavior demonstrates something. What that something might be is another matter.
And you?
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Unless you feel that they are engaging in self-parody, or that they have no real interest in actual dialogue.
Is that your contention?
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Voltaire2
(14,632 posts)the correct phrase is cannot see the forest for the trees.
The point is you have to step back from the tree to see that it is part of a larger entity, a forest.
You literally cannot be so close to the forest that you cannot see the tree. The closer you get to the forest the more individual trees you see. Eventually you are so close all you can see is one tree. Which was the point of the metaphor.
Please try again. You need more practice with this metaphor thing.
MineralMan
(147,334 posts)I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt in this case. I doubt he understood what he was saying.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)My misunderstanding.
MineralMan
(147,334 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)MineralMan
(147,334 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Probably is a bit vague, but it is a better response than "never".
MineralMan
(147,334 posts)MineralMan
(147,334 posts)The French expression is: Impossible de voir le bois pour les arbres
You have misconstrued the expression, thus losing its meaning. Perhaps reading it in French will clarify its meaning for you.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)you are incorrect, z'avez pas de raison, vous.
Step back and look harder.
Voltaire2
(14,632 posts)that it instead looks like its containing geographical feature.
You truly don't appear to understand what "can't see the forest for the trees" means.
It is a metaphor about sets and elements of sets, or if that is too complex for you, the whole thing, and the parts that the thing is made of.
So to re-iterate, to see the trees, step closer to the forest. To see the forest, step away from the tree.
You however should step away from metaphors.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Again.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Why are you like this?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=304549
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Even if it's on fire, there are some who think the people who refuse to use it are the problem, and not the folks who set it on fire.
Major Nikon
(36,899 posts)because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. -- Susan B. Anthony
Doesn't sound like someone who wanted to "build bridges".
Bretton Garcia
(970 posts)Like Pastafarianism.
But if religious folks fall for it?
Hmmmmm. What does that tell us?
Voltaire2
(14,632 posts)That's my guess and I'm sticking to it. Literally. There was peanut butter on the toast.