Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumD.C. has its first black archbishop, but what took so long?
(headline cont'd)... Look to the history of black U.S. Catholicism.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2019/04/04/dc-has-its-first-black-archbishop-what-took-so-long-look-history-black-us-catholicism/
Archbishop Wilton D. Gregorys appointment to lead the Archdiocese of Washington is a long-overdue honor for Gregory and the long-suffering black Catholic community in the United States. Often taken for granted, black Catholics now have an archbishop who heads a storied political archdiocese and is likely to become first black cardinal from this country.
Gregorys appointment however, raises two important questions: Why did it take so long to appoint an African American bishop to one of the most important dioceses in the country? And why isnt he a cardinal yet?
The answers partially lie in the history of racism within the U.S. Catholic church and in the Washington region in particular.
...Gregorys appointment is a turning point, but this appointment alone does not mean that racial issues are resolved in the U.S. Catholic Church. Racism is the reason it has taken so long for a black bishop to be in contention to become a cardinal.
Gregorys appointment however, raises two important questions: Why did it take so long to appoint an African American bishop to one of the most important dioceses in the country? And why isnt he a cardinal yet?
The answers partially lie in the history of racism within the U.S. Catholic church and in the Washington region in particular.
...Gregorys appointment is a turning point, but this appointment alone does not mean that racial issues are resolved in the U.S. Catholic Church. Racism is the reason it has taken so long for a black bishop to be in contention to become a cardinal.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 877 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
D.C. has its first black archbishop, but what took so long? (Original Post)
trotsky
Apr 2019
OP
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)1. Intolerance in the RCC? Impossible.
Its just human nature. So says the apologist, and so it must be.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)2. The most perplexing thing about asserting such a defense...
is the tacit admission that religion does NOTHING to make people better.
Ah, doublethink.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)4. Misframing!
Religion gets the credit when a religionist does something good.
Not surprisingly this is more or less the official position of the RCC. The deceiver gets all the blame for the bad shit even when RCC officials are the perps. All the good shit gets chalked up for the benevolent sky daddy.
MineralMan
(147,576 posts)3. Not too many black RCC seminarians in the 60s and 70s.