Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Tue Jun 4, 2019, 09:19 AM Jun 2019

Catholic Priest: Women Must Cover Their Shoulders at Mass to Protect Male Purity

https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/06/04/catholic-priest-women-must-cover-their-shoulders-at-mass-to-protect-male-purity/

Another day, another Catholic leader saying something idiotic on Twitter, then doubling down on it.

This time, it’s Father Kevin M. Cusick, a former Lieutenant Commander in the US Navy chaplain corps, telling women to cover up their bodies to avoid offending the delicate sensibilities of men.

...The lesson is clear: Catholic women should just wear a burqa, or maybe full body armor, when attending Mass. Do it for Jesus.

Or perhaps women should just walk out of the Catholic Church for good. That way priests would never have to look at their naked shoulders at all.


Bullshit victim blaming from the largest Christian church in the world. Men are responsible for their own damn behavior. Why does the RCC think otherwise?
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Catholic Priest: Women Must Cover Their Shoulders at Mass to Protect Male Purity (Original Post) trotsky Jun 2019 OP
What about little boys? 50 Shades Of Blue Jun 2019 #1
NO TIGHT-FITTING TROUSERS, EVER!!! Vogon_Glory Jun 2019 #2
+1 MontanaMama Jun 2019 #3
Here was an appropriate response: trotsky Jun 2019 #4
Or better yet, stay home. Save your collection money for something better. 3Hotdogs Jun 2019 #5
Well he has a point edhopper Jun 2019 #6
Well, now, sales of mantillas should skyrocket there. MineralMan Jun 2019 #7
Standard RCC Theology zipplewrath Jun 2019 #8
Why can't they just pluck their eyes out? Major Nikon Jun 2019 #9
The alternative is awkward for all involved Cartoonist Jun 2019 #10
Covered shoulders,covered heads, virgogal Jun 2019 #11

zipplewrath

(16,685 posts)
8. Standard RCC Theology
Tue Jun 4, 2019, 11:35 AM
Jun 2019

There is a standard bit of theology in the RCC that says the temper is as sinful as the tempted. Much of the story of the embodiment of evil (the devil, Lucifer, fallen angels, etc.) is as a tempter, not as an actual "doer of evil". The theology can get tortured though because one quickly goes from the concept of the intentional temper (basically a con man so to speak) to this kind of thought that one can be a "temper" by merely existing. In law there is the concept of entrapment which is roughly the same thing, tempting someone to do something they might otherwise not do. We draw a distinction between that and people who see an opportunity to do something wrong and act upon it. If I carelessly or forgetfully leave my keys in my car, that's not entrapment.

But on more than one occasion, the church has acted to say that leaving your keys was a sinful act. This is what they are doing here. Bare shoulders, in the past it might have been bare ankles, or tight clothes is seen as a sin because of how OTHER people will behave.

I love it when these "dress code" arguments start. There is nothing harder to define than a dress code. And it is virtually impossible to justify "style" based codes. Safety gear is one thing. But after that, it gets really difficult to justify anything on any other basis than "I don't like it".

Cartoonist

(7,507 posts)
10. The alternative is awkward for all involved
Tue Jun 4, 2019, 11:48 AM
Jun 2019

This is a threat. This is also the first time I've heard rape described as awkward.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Catholic Priest: Women Mu...