Religion
Related: About this forumAfter Satanist's Invocation, Alaska Borough Officials Want to End the Practice
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/07/01/after-satanists-invocation-alaska-borough-officials-want-to-end-the-practice/#comment-4522950679
After Satanists Invocation, Alaska Borough Officials Want to End the Practice
By Hemant Mehta, July 1, 2019
Two weeks ago, Satanist Iris Fontana delivered an invocation at a meeting of the Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly in Alaska, leading to protests on that day and beyond.
It was actually the second time shes given the prayer. After the first time, two years ago, the assembly members instituted new rules effectively blocking Satanists and atheists from ever giving the invocation again. They sued. They won. The borough opened up the invocation opportunities to everyone and several non-Christians signed up. Fontana was one of them, which is why she spoke last month.
She didnt say anything problematic. She even urged officials to use reason, logic, science, and compassion to create solutions for the greater good of our community. Lovely! But she didnt hide her identity, either, ending her prayer with the words, It is Done. Hail Satan.
Now one official is proposing getting rid of the invocation entirely.
Assembly member Willy Dunne said in a recent memo (written the day after Fontanas speech) that invocations are no longer meeting the spiritual needs of assembly members. Instead they have resulted in controversial and divisive actions in our community.Ending the practice of invocations will save the borough taxpayers money and reduce divisiveness in our community. It is expected that assembly members can find ways to have their spiritual needs met outside of public meetings.
Hes calling for a vote at their next meeting tomorrow that would put a ballot measure in front of citizens to eliminate invocations at future meetings.
From the comments:
shanny
(6,709 posts)I bet the Satanists and atheists are too.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)As a longtime atheist, I've given invocations at public meetings, myself, on a few dozen occasions. A few times, I did so for government bodies, like city councils or county boards. Completely non-religious ones. Like that Satanist, my invocations always call for decisions to be made logically and with concern for those who aren't there to speak. However, I didn't invoke some other deity. I just ended with, "Thank you."
In some cases, I asked to give an invocation as a non-religious person, for reasons of fairness. In a few cases, I was asked to do so by someone in the group, who recognized that different forms of invocation should be part of the mix.
Oddly enough, my religion-free invocations were always well-received and did not lead to angry criticisms. Mostly, nobody noticed that I left off any mention of any sort of deity. I thought that was interesting at the time.
I have invocations (calls to fair and logical action), statements before meals, (recognition of sources), and benedictions (good words) ready to deliver on demand. I can deliver them at a moment's notice, and am always happy to do so. They are all brief and non-confrontational, and have no religious content whatsoever.
Tech
(1,922 posts)Cartoonist
(7,532 posts)I suspect this is a stunt to increase divisiveness in the community.
Mariana
(15,120 posts)for making the decision. They can continue to allow equal access as required by the law, or they can do away with the "invocations" altogether. Either of these actions will no doubt offend many local Christians, and the assembly members won't want to be on the hook one way or the other.
I hope Ms. Fontana's house insurance is paid up.
Iggo
(48,271 posts)Mariana
(15,120 posts)Your bullshit "invocations" were always divisive. That was the point of having them in the first place, to be divisive by excluding non-Christians.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Iggo
(48,271 posts)Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)Who listens anyhow?