Yah, that makes sense.

"the prophecy of Uriah related by the Prophet Micah had come to be was proof that the prophecy of Zechariah would also come to be."

These guys knew their shit - should have run for a political office.

As I understand it, they were part of the political scene back then.

that a prophecy has been fulfilled.

It says in Micah that Jerusalem will be destroyed. Not that starling a prediction, since that's set in the 8th century BC (whether or not that bit was written then), when the Assyrians were already pretty aggressive. Zechariah was written shortly after the return from Babylonian exile, and the quote is just "everything's going to be fine in the end". Nothing, of course, to do with foxes.

The excerpt from the Talmud is just a bit of stupid "everything in the Bible must be true" bollocks. It says "Micah was right that Jerusalem would be sacked, so Zechariah must be right that everything turns out good, because that's in out scriptures too. So don't worry about the fox." It doesn't make sense of course, but it's message was just "don't worry about minor things like foxes". So why on earth should seeing foxes again there be "Proof Jerusalem Returning to Former Glory"? If anyone can be more specific than "2,000 years ago" the bit from the Talmud was talking about was, that might help. 2,000 years ago, Jerusalem was under Roman control. 1,950 years ago, it got sacked again, after a revolt, and the 2nd temple was destroyed. If you really did think that the Talmud excerpt was telling you anything, it would be "bad times are just around the corner".

It predicted the Romans’ destruction of Jerusalem, including the Second Temple, in 70 A.D.

At best it made an open ended prediction that at some time in the future Jerusalem would get sacked again. Eventually, that happened. Cities getting repeatedly sacked was (and arguably still is) pretty much normal. Had the prophecy been specific about when it would have been impressive. As is it is about as impressive as the horseshit in nostra damas.

But carry on.

We got foxes!

There. I'm a prophet, too!

to the World of Disney.

for saying religious beliefs are delusions.

Iirc, there is a “prophecy” about the destruction of Damascus which again iirc is the longest continuously inhabited city.

Blanford's fox inhabits semiarid regions, steppes, and mountains of Afghanistan, Egypt (Sinai), Turkestan,[6] northeast Iran, southwest Pakistan, the West Bank, and Israel.[7] It may also live throughout Arabia (particularly Oman, Yemen, and Jordan), as one was trapped in Dhofari region of Oman in 1984. Recent camera trapping surveys have confirmed the presence of the species in several places in the mountains of South Sinai, Egypt,[8] the mountains of Ras Al Khaimah[9] and Jebel Hafeet[10][11] in the UAE, and in Saudi Arabia.[12]

showed up somewhere? What a stretch of the imagination to think they are a sign of anything at all, much less that some OT prophesies said something about Jerusalem...

Foxes live there. So, they are seen there. Meaningless.

So, here is a video of a mother turkey and her poults, walking across lawns on my street. What does that mean?

Got a bad reputation with poultry?

Turkeys are so stupid they didn't check under our bird feeders. If they had, they'd never leave.

Do you feed them... turkey?