Religion
Related: About this forumBishop Named by Pope to Investigate Abuse is Accused Himself
New York Times...
Last month, Pope Francis chose Bishop DiMarzio to investigate the Buffalo, N.Y., diocese, where Bishop Richard J. Malone has come under criticism for his handling of a mushrooming clergy abuse scandal.
I mean. Wow.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)MineralMan
(147,591 posts)Foxes in the hen house, at the very least. Turn the entire investigation over to the law enforcement community.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Under normal circumstances, what are the odds a single, random individual is a child abuser?
This is either a stunning fluke of probability, or the Church has a serious fucking problem.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)The problem is so widespread and universal that it is obviously an organizational norm. It cannot be fixed from inside the organization, in that case. That's my assessment, after all these years and all those abused children. Bring in the prosecutors and give them total access. They'll flush it all out.
Either that or shut the entire thing down.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)That is precisely true, but also why the RCC will never try anything else. They have always viewed themselves as apart from and above ANY secular authority. That belief is a fundamental part of the RCC DNA. So no, it will never get fixed.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)sexual abuse by its clergy. The secrecy, the single gender makeup of the clergy, the excessive power held by priests, and the secondary, subservient role of women in the organization set up a perfect storm for sexual abuse of children. It's almost as though someone created the organizational structure for just such a purpose.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)Who better to catch child rapists than a child rapist?
Or it could be they just absolutely don't give a fuck. And why would they considering they have so many child rape apologists working overtime to convince the rank in file and the public this is simply a matter of demonic infiltration and is in no way inherent to organized religion.
Dorian Gray
(13,717 posts)they have to outside law enforcement officials. Because any self-investigation looks like self-preservation. It's terrible.
I don't fully trust law enforcement to dole out justice for forty year old crimes, but at least they're independent and not self-serving.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Rotten to the core.
Voltaire2
(14,719 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Who will watch the watchers?
No matter the institutional setting, any abuse is horrible. And covering up the abuse is equally horrible.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)MineralMan
(147,591 posts)both are true. Some like to watch, besides.
And it's all doing the work of God, see, so there you are...
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Institutional cover ups are an integral part of the problem of predators existing in institutional settings.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)The RCC protects its own, even its predators. In so doing, it makes itself a hypocritical liar. All in the name of Jesus.
You do yours. I'll do mine and have none of yours, thanks.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)It is human behavior, and sadly, not unique to any one class of humans.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)I did not say it was unique in any way. I did say that it is corrupt, however, and have said that many times.
It should be disbanded forthwith.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Including the family, the place where much abuse occurs?
And the school system as well?
And the military?
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)I understand that these questions weaken your narrative, but they are obvious questions to ask.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)Once that happens, there is no possibility of discussion.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)That is where the illogic started.
Mariana
(15,120 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)And that the same cover ups exist?
edhopper
(34,836 posts)to be in the service of God makes them no different than any criminal enterprise.
So appearantly, belief and living for God does not make anyone any better than a nonbeliever.
Why all this obsession with faith and sin and prayer when people involved are no better than those not?
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)I do not expect anything different, but I do expect, or hope, that anyone with knowledge of a child abuser would report that knowledge to the authorities.
But people conceal things. Family members conceal abuse, institutional members do so as well.
As to the "criminal enterprise" rhetoric, the purpose of the RCC is not to abuse children, or to commit crimes, so your analogy fails.
edhopper
(34,836 posts)The purpose of the GOP is not to enable treason, but that is what they do.
The commitment to God has not made them better thasn any other group.
So in a blind study, belief in God is ineffective in making a group or person better.
God has no positive effect.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Both in its extent (worldwide) and its lack of secular oversight.
But I understand why you would rather whatabout.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)But I understand your need to promote your narrative.
Much abuse occurs in the family, which exists worldwide and has no effective secular oversight.
Child abuse is everywhere. The family, schools, scouting organizations, the military, and anywhere there are children and pedophiles.
Mariana
(15,120 posts)Voltaire2
(14,719 posts)Much abuse occurs in the family, which exists worldwide and has no effective secular oversight.
Lets start with families not having effective secular oversight. There most certainly is oversight of families, in particular with respect to sexual and physical child abuse, in just about every developed nation. In most countries an allegation of child abuse will be taken very seriously by the relevant secular authorities and acted on quickly. If the preliminary investigation indicates that the allegation has a basis in fact, steps are taken to protect the children and a criminal investigation is conducted.
What secular authorities dont do is appoint one of the parents to investigate the other.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)the problem would not be so wide spread.
Voltaire2
(14,719 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Child abuse is everywhere. The religion of the abusers, or lack thereof, is of no consequence to the abused child.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)What is more or less unique to the RCC is the systemic nature of said abuse.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)It is when the religion promotes the notion that the priest class is above secular law.
But you never want to acknowledge that. I wonder why?
edhopper
(34,836 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)Look at Trump defenders - they do the same thing. If confronted with his illegal behavior, they'll scream "But Obama! But Hillary! Benghazi! BUTTERY MALES!!!!!"
They can't defend Trump's unique and excessive corruption, so they flail wildly as if any kind of corruption, real or imagined, done by other politicians makes Trump's crimes no big deal. "Everybody does it."
As I posted above, I have seen the GOP/RCC parrallel.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)I understand why you do not want to talk about those issues, and would rather try to lump it under "everybody abuses."
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Or the concept of the secrecy of the confessional?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)I've explained exactly why the RCC's abuse problem is unique, multiple times.
You've never, ever addressed ANY of my arguments, but instead just play this game over and over.
Let me know when you really want to discuss the issue.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)So there is that.
Are you truly surprised that humans behave in this way no matter where they exist?
If so, why?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)The teachings and practices of your (former?) church help enable child abusers. By setting up the church hierarchy to be "above" secular law, they make the problem WORSE. Do you agree or disagree? I bet you won't answer. You'll just whatabout some more.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)a conclusion. Hardly an example of using the scientific method.
And this insistence on restricting the dialogue is present in your latest example of posing a question that is actually a statement of your own opinion.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)You mean wanting to discuss the particular aspects of Religion in the Religion group?
Guilty as charged.
No, guillaumeb, it's YOU who wants to limit the discussion here. Fortunately you are terrible at it, and only end up making yourself look like a religious hypocrite.
Dorian Gray
(13,717 posts)I'm a practicing Roman Catholic and a believer, so I'm going to say this with as much respect as I can muster.
We all know that abuse happens world wide.
The RCC is a holy institution and purports that it is directly descended from the apostles of Jesus.
Yet, we've historically enablied those abusers to continue their abuse. It is SHOCKING and infuriating.
We deserve all the intense heat we have gotten for it, and it's time to demand that we clean out our house.
When our community is seriously challenged by it's own history of culpability in child abuse, talking about other people doing it too doesn't help anybody.
I love my chuch. I love my community. I love Jesus. I love God. I love so much about my faith.
I hate that it's been corrupted by pedophiles, and I hate that the public is RIGHTFULLY enraged by it.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)suggesting that the RCC is uniquely culpable is illogical.
Dorian Gray
(13,717 posts)it is "whataboutism" to talk about how the rest of society does it, too.
That doesn't mitigate our responsibility to our church, our flock, and making reparations for what was done, ignored, enabled, and covered up.
The biggest threat do the RCC doesn't come from OUTSIDE the church. Most damage inflicted was from within.
I think it's really really important for us to remember and to have humility about it.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)And it is not diversion to note that abuse and cover-ups are a constant. Diversion would be to note these things in an attempt to excuse them.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Nitram
(24,611 posts)NeoGreen
(4,033 posts)...from harming children and/or covering up the crime(s).
Maybe this is all caused by a reliance on 'faith'.
Dorian Gray
(13,717 posts)DiMarzio has always been beaurocratic. He doesn't have the personality of Cardinal Dolan. He's NYC's second banana bishop
Having said that, I was surprised at Mass yesterday. I expected our priest to ignore the accusation. But at the end of Mass he read a letter written by DiMarzio. DiMarzio asked that it be read during every single mass that weekend. It, of course, denied the accusations, but I was somewhat surprised that he was meeting the accusation head on.
So, there is that.
Hopefully there will be a real investigation and the truth will come to light. Only through the light of truth can the darkness be chased away. If the accuser was victimized by the Bishop, I hope he receives real restitution.