Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumKentucky man wins case in federal court, allowing his personalized license plate to say 'I'M GOD'
A federal court today cleared the way for a Kentucky man, backed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation and the ACLU of Kentucky, to obtain a personalized license plate reading IM GOD, finding the Transportation Cabinets denial of that plate violated the First Amendment.
In November 2016, Ben Hart filed a lawsuit after he was denied the personalized license plate. Kentucky Division of Motor Vehicle officials, who have approved certain religious personalized plates, refused Harts request, initially calling his IM GOD license plate message obscene or vulgar. Later, the state said the plate was rejected because it was not in good taste. (While residing in Ohio, Hart had a similar license plate seen in the picture.)
The lawsuit, filed on Harts behalf by FFRF and ACLU of Kentucky, challenged the Transportation Cabinets denial of his plate based on statutory viewpoint restrictions that communicate religious, anti-religious or political messages.
The Commonwealth [of Kentucky] went too far, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Court of Kentucky resoundingly ruled in favor of Hart.
https://www.nkytribune.com/2019/11/kentucky-man-wins-case-in-federal-court-allowing-his-personalized-license-plate-to-say-im-god/
In November 2016, Ben Hart filed a lawsuit after he was denied the personalized license plate. Kentucky Division of Motor Vehicle officials, who have approved certain religious personalized plates, refused Harts request, initially calling his IM GOD license plate message obscene or vulgar. Later, the state said the plate was rejected because it was not in good taste. (While residing in Ohio, Hart had a similar license plate seen in the picture.)
The lawsuit, filed on Harts behalf by FFRF and ACLU of Kentucky, challenged the Transportation Cabinets denial of his plate based on statutory viewpoint restrictions that communicate religious, anti-religious or political messages.
The Commonwealth [of Kentucky] went too far, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Court of Kentucky resoundingly ruled in favor of Hart.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1182 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kentucky man wins case in federal court, allowing his personalized license plate to say 'I'M GOD' (Original Post)
Major Nikon
Nov 2019
OP
RockRaven
(16,265 posts)1. On one hand, I love stories like this... on the other hand
every one of these cases risks that they will make it up to the Supreme Court and we will eventually get a SCOTUS ruling which will destroy even these token non-bowing-down-to-the-Christian-theocracy-we-all-live-in-at-the-moment.
We're in a bad spot right now with this SCOTUS. Is now really the time to tickle the dragon? But OTOH if we don't do so now, will we even preserve enough of our freedoms to do so later? What a mess...
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)2. Not impressed-- call me when he gets "Big Dick McGee" approved.
Beakybird
(3,391 posts)3. Next: IM HIGH
Canoe52
(2,963 posts)4. Florida man would have that one.