anti-sex religious fanatics, whether Evangelical or Catholic or others that any sex not for procreation. This mainly stems from Paul, who had big problems with sex and women, and not from the words attributed to Yeshua.

Sex for procreation only…. Seems so easy to break that rule from our creator. Due to his faulty creation and all.

it does talk about sex shouldn't be outside marriage. Of course marriage is between a man and as many women as he can afford.

In which case "Yeshua" (not my usual spelling) said it was man/woman. Paul reprised that.

Two schools of conservative thought:

Catholic tradition (sex is for procreation, unless that's ruled out for reasons of biology, and it's okay to game that a bit), then I don't know what they say about oral sex.
Then there's the non-Catholic tradition, sex is kept within heterosexual monogamy. In which case there's no restriction on oral sex.

However, that seems to be a superficial and inaccurate interpretation to me. Onan's so-called crime is purposely subverting a different rule, in my reading of that story.

It's the usual interpretation for those with some college and a willngness to use that training.

Is specifically went against an ofder by God, he did not impregnate his sister-in-law. He spilled his seed instead.
It wasn't the spilled seed that was the sin.

With every new social trend, they can twist a bible passage to fit. I don't recall the bible mentioning rock and roll but millions of sermons have been delivered against it.
I hope I live long enough to hear a sermon on the sin of lusting for an android.

The reality of the matter is Iron Age goat herders and carpenters have very little information that is useful for navigating the modern world.