Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
'Stone of London' is returned to Cannon Street
LONDON The stone of London has been returned to its rightful place this autumn. But whats the history behind this sooty old piece of oolitic limestone? Where has it been? And why is its return a matter of importance?
The stone itself is a landmark at 111 Cannon Street, London. Its existence was first recorded in the 1100s. we dont know when it was first cut or what it was for, although there has long been speculation that its origins are Roman not an improbable speculation given the Roman roots of the capital. (We shall return to this hypothesis later in this article.) It is part of a larger piece of stone, but it was significant enough for rebel leader Jack Cade, in 1450, to strike it with his sword and declare himself to be Lord of this city in opposition to King Henry VI.
In Shakespeares play about Henrys reign, Cade declares:
And here, sitting
upon London-stone, I charge and command that, of the
citys cost, the pissing-conduit run nothing but
claret wine this first year of our reign.
In Elizabethan times, the stone was a popular attraction. There were claims that it had stood there prior to the founding of the city. Later, William Blake depicted it as a Druidic altar stone on which human sacrifices had been conducted. He wrote, And the Druids golden knife/Rioted in human gore,/ In offerings of human life./ They groand aloud on London stone. And, there have even been claims that it was the stone from which King Arthur drew his sword Excalibur.
The stone itself is a landmark at 111 Cannon Street, London. Its existence was first recorded in the 1100s. we dont know when it was first cut or what it was for, although there has long been speculation that its origins are Roman not an improbable speculation given the Roman roots of the capital. (We shall return to this hypothesis later in this article.) It is part of a larger piece of stone, but it was significant enough for rebel leader Jack Cade, in 1450, to strike it with his sword and declare himself to be Lord of this city in opposition to King Henry VI.
In Shakespeares play about Henrys reign, Cade declares:
And here, sitting
upon London-stone, I charge and command that, of the
citys cost, the pissing-conduit run nothing but
claret wine this first year of our reign.
In Elizabethan times, the stone was a popular attraction. There were claims that it had stood there prior to the founding of the city. Later, William Blake depicted it as a Druidic altar stone on which human sacrifices had been conducted. He wrote, And the Druids golden knife/Rioted in human gore,/ In offerings of human life./ They groand aloud on London stone. And, there have even been claims that it was the stone from which King Arthur drew his sword Excalibur.
https://wildhunt.org/2018/10/stone-of-london-is-returned-to-cannon-street.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1814 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Stone of London' is returned to Cannon Street (Original Post)
icymist
Oct 2018
OP
handmade34
(22,925 posts)1. ...
Staph
(6,346 posts)2. I'm currently reading London by Edward Rutherfurd.
The London Stone appears in several chapters, as a way of tying together the different eras portrayed. Rutherfurd supposes that the stone was placed in front of the Roman Governor's Palace (probably true!) and served as the milepost from which all roads' mileposts are measured (interesting theory but unproven!).
Good book, if you're a fan of the James Michner-style of writing, covering many time periods through the families that live there.
rsdsharp
(10,121 posts)3. It is a good book.
I've also read his Sarum and Russka. In somewhat the same style is Ken Follett's Century trilogy.