Something happened today that makes me very unhappy with DU3.
I'm going to need to think about it a bit. I just realized that SpiralHawk was banned by Skinner for something I thought was pretty trivial. I may end up having to activate my Facebook account after all.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124023464
Celebration
(15,812 posts)Yikes that is way over the top to be banned for that!
And everybody in that thread agrees. Maybe he had a bad day! Ugh............
backtoblue
(11,676 posts)I would've thought that a suspension would've been harsh, let alone getting banned. Yikes!
Response to backtoblue (Reply #2)
Fire Walk With Me This message was self-deleted by its author.
Howler
(4,225 posts)That does seem like overkill.
onecent
(6,096 posts)of felt like DU was a "safe" haven for people to discuss or cuss about things they felt...
Wise to have limits....but I don't believe I want to ever be on a jury.... I am not here to judge others for their
thoughts.
Remember Me
(1,532 posts)It's a common misconception. The First Amendment only prevents GOVERNMENT from censoring your speech. Whenever you find yourself on private property -- privately owned property, that is, such as DU -- you can be censored all day long every day.
rosesaylavee
(12,126 posts)Not sure I will be posting much if at all here now.
OneGrassRoot
(23,406 posts)I check in every few days; whereas I used to check in several times a day.
I agree with you. It is both unpleasant and unfamiliar. At least in DU2-GD the unpleasantness was familiar.
Mist
(5,780 posts)list of "forbidden" topics is a riot, except not really funny. My friends and I often spend an evening on the "forbidden" subjects, so I'm not sure
how off the wall they really are.
NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)i'm close to being done myself. starting to look like it outlived its usefulness. the primaries poisoning will be a deciding factor.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)liberalmuse
(18,876 posts)Still Blue in PDX
(1,999 posts)Someone at work was talking about something unmentionable one day and piqued my curiosity. I had no idea it was ban-worthy.
Holy cow -- guess I'm lucky to still be here.
Tumbulu
(6,437 posts)that is so weird, but would she have been banned in the oldDU as well?
Was these topics banned there too?
icymist
(15,888 posts)<snip>
Don't go overboard with the crazy talk.
Democratic Underground is not intended to be a platform for kooks and crackpots peddling paranoid fantasies with little or no basis in fact. To accomodate our more imaginative members we tolerate some limited discussion of so-called "conspiracy theories" under the following circumstances: First, those discussions are not permitted in our heavily-trafficked Main forums; and second, those discussions cannot stray too far into Crazyland (eg: chemtrails, black helicopters, 9/11 death rays or holograms, the "New World Order," the Bilderbergers, the Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons, alien abduction, Bigfoot, and the like). In addition, please be aware that many conspiracy theories have roots in racism and anti-semitism, and Democratic Underground has zero tolerance for bigoted hate speech. In short, you take your chances.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
Personally, I find it a shame about what happened to SpiralHawk.
Tumbulu
(6,437 posts)I wonder why that topic freaks them out so much? How strange.
right on maude...
(29 posts)I mean, "they" are stepping up the spraying big time. It was pointed out to me and I now see it practically every time I gaze up at the sky.
What's so dangerous about even mentioning it? Doesn't that give one pause?
kentauros
(29,414 posts)It, along with all the others they label as "CrazyLand", seems to really bother the admins and such. Best not to antagonize if you can help it. Their one sentence in the TOS, "In short, you take your chances", doesn't really help, either. It would be better to have a complete list of forbidden topics and state emphatically that they are not to be discussed. "Taking your chances" won't work when those odds are stacked against you.
At the same time, the Matthew Messages threads seem to be okay, but I would guess no one but us ever looks at them. It's full of references to the Illuminati. I have to ignore that part of it because I don't really believe in such organizations. Then again, I love the site RexResearch as well as sometimes browsing Fortean Times. Both include topics that would likely get me banned were I to discuss them openly. Better is to find forums elsewhere that don't have such restrictions.
Response to icymist (Reply #13)
Fire Walk With Me This message was self-deleted by its author.
Celebration
(15,812 posts)I don't have the time or interest to check and comment on Chem trail threads but that response was not at all out of bounds.
kimmerspixelated
(8,423 posts)Dungeonized. It wasn't even particularly flame-worthy.
Remember Me
(1,532 posts)It seems to be an absolutely verboten subject.
I wandered in there one day and in whatever discussion happened to mention them or comment on a mention and I was schooled very promptly NOT to discuss chemtrails even there. I don't think I've been back since.
I'm just sick about SpiralHawk, though.
Habibi
(3,600 posts)I find that ASAH is the first/last place I visit these days. I feel like I understand the rules here more than any other forum/group.
BlueIris
(29,135 posts)This site, while it does have its occasional insightful post from an unusual or rarely heard perspective, is pretty mainstream. Then again, so is most of the Internets.
Response to GardeningGal (Original post)
Kookaburra This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to GardeningGal (Original post)
LaurenG This message was self-deleted by its author.
FirstLight
(13,963 posts)...did they allow him/her back? It was seriously a really out there and harsh decision, you'd think they'd reconsider?
GardeningGal
(2,211 posts)Take a look at this thread - it's painful though.
I'm really not liking the energy of DU3. It's seems pretty dark to me now.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124024351#post113
edited because I forgot to post the link. duh!
Metta
(5,822 posts)Looks as if DU3 is becoming a swamp compared with the sensitivity and comradary of DU2.