Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(34,675 posts)
Wed Jul 20, 2022, 12:07 AM Jul 2022

Happily my assumption was wrong.

We had an AAAS text chat today on Covid testing, and were invited to post questions for Dr. Wilbur Lam, Professor and W. Paul Bowers Research Chair in the Department of Pediatrics and the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology.

My question:

have a question for Dr. Lam:

I assume that the antigen tests are developed using an antibody that binds to a specific epitope on the S-protein. We've seen multiple mutations in this protein, which in fact, correspond to the variants, both of concern and of less concern. Is there any systematic approach to evaluating historic or current tests against the variants? Are there tests that should be recalled?


His answer corrected my assumption:

Hi David, most rapid tests are actually detecting the presence of nucleocapsid proteins, not spike proteins, because exactly of your concern with the high prevalence of spike proteins. Interestingly, our own Center in Atlanta, is constantly re-testing the tests of the market whenever new variants of concern emerge. In addition, we're developing a more high tech, structural biology approach called epitope mapping to predict which tests are at risk for "missing" detection of new variants (even theoretical or hypothetical ones) - more to come on that!


That's good news. I was wondering about that, and assumed that the antibodies were directed against the Spike Protein, probably because that's the one in the news. Happily I was wrong.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Happily my assumption was wrong. (Original Post) NNadir Jul 2022 OP
Good question and helpful answer! WestMichRad Jul 2022 #1

WestMichRad

(1,814 posts)
1. Good question and helpful answer!
Wed Jul 20, 2022, 07:23 AM
Jul 2022

I also have wondered about what part of the virus the antigen tests tested for. Nice to know the test is robust enough to be valid against multiple variants… at least, so far.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Happily my assumption was...