Science
Related: About this forumScientists finally detected O-28. It's instability surprised them
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/oxygen-28-instability-surprise-physicsUsing a powerful particle accelerator, researchers have spotted an elusive variant of oxygen for the first time. The isotope, oxygen-28, was predicted to be stable thanks to its eight protons and 20 neutrons magic numbers associated with extra stability in atomic nuclei.
Atomic nuclei are made up of protons and neutrons, each of which are thought to occupy their own shells discrete energy levels that are separated by large energy gaps. Atomic nuclei with full outer shells are bound extra tightly, making them very stable. Shells fill up when they hit two, eight, 20, 28, 50, 82 and 126 subatomic particles (SN: 10/9/13).
Finding the isotope took a combination of brute force and experimental elegance. Physicist Yosuke Kondo of the Tokyo Institute of Technology and colleagues used a particle accelerator to smash calcium-48 atoms against a beryllium target. This fragmented the calcium-48 atoms into lighter isotopes, including fluorine-29. Throwing the fluorine-29 against a liquid hydrogen target knocked off a single proton, producing oxygen-28.
Scientists expected the isotope to be stable, but it isnt: it sloughs off 4 neutrons in a femtosecond (1E-21 sec). O-28s surprising instability indicates theres something we dont understand about the strong nuclear force, which binds together protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus.
A little more in the article.
John1956PA
(3,368 posts)When the O-28 nucleus sheds four neutrons, as the article says that it does in a femtosecond, it has a neutron excess of 8. We can breathe easily knowing that good ole' O-16 is the most plentiful and most stable isotope.
ON EDIT: The correct word "neutrons" was inserted to replace a word which I mistakenly typed in the original version of this reply post.
Wounded Bear
(60,683 posts)No electrons in the nucleus.
John1956PA
(3,368 posts). . . that four neutrons (not electrons as I absent-mindedly stated) are shed in that incredibly short interval of time.
That you for you interesting OP. Best wishes.
Wounded Bear
(60,683 posts)eppur_se_muova
(37,397 posts)This nuclide still has a HUGE excess of neutrons.
I can only assume this is confusion on the part of a science journalist, who took 'relatively' stable and indefinitely stable -- the canonical usage of the word 'stable' -- to mean the same thing.
Si-28 is the only stable nuclide with A=28; no others should be expected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-decay_stable_isobars