Science
Related: About this forumMissed LA Bhopal: The 2015 Torrance, CA Exxon Refinery Explosion: A Nice Process Based Animation of the Failure.
When I was a kid, in a bit of irony during my personal revolt against the internal combustion engine (which failed ultimately) I used to bicycle down Crenshaw Blvd in Torrance California on my way to work where there was a huge Exxon oil refinery which I knew had a huge amount, ton scale I believe, of hydrofluoric acid (HF), a cracking catalyst, that has terrifying properties.
(I once had to kick a bunch of guys working for me out of the lab and suit up in heavy PPE to clean up a spill they'd caused as a result of a deviation, of about 10 or 15 grams of liquid HF in a hood. It was the scariest incident in my career but no one was injured because remediation equipment was readily available in the lab.)
In 2017, there was a huge explosion at the refinery (which has since been sold by Exxon) leading to a 80,000 pound chunk of metal landing close to the HF tank. Had the tank ruptured it would have created a Bhopal like situation in Torrance and beyond. (See the second video below.)
There's a nice animation video of interest to chemical engineering types to explain what happened. Here it is:
A news item referring to the explosion:
There is no such thing as risk free energy technology, but some technologies are worse than others. I personally have no use for dangerous fossil fuels, because their use in normal situations is deadly, never mind their risks in abnormal situations.
I trust you're enjoying the weekend.
4dog
(520 posts)Reminded me that in HS chemistry I got to perform an "experiment," in which, following instructions, I mixed some F salt with H2SO4 in a dish, which was covered with a small glass plate that had been coated with paraffin wax, with a design scribed in it. No hood in the classroom, so I put the assembly outside the casement window and left it overnight. The glass plate was etched, as expected. I don't recall, but the residues probably went down the sink.
4dog
(520 posts)to make high-octane gasoline additives. Alternative to H2SO4. Also, poorer hits, to reduce S in diesel fuel.
NNadir
(34,661 posts)This would have mitigated the danger, by making the release very slow.
The standard way to remediate small HF spills is to treat them with a calcium salt or better yet, calcium hydroxide. On skin, where it is very dangerous, since one will not know about the contamination until it is "too late" - a hole appears in the flesh - calcium gluconate is often used.
I doubt though that there was enough calcium hydroxide in all of Los Angeles County to neutralize the HF in that tank.
In the old days, I concede, some high school chemistry teachers used to do relatively dangerous things. To be perfectly honest, my interest in chemistry derives from my high school teacher tossing a piece of sodium metal in a glass beaker and blowing it to pieces.
I should state, to be perfectly honest, that I favor HF/salt eutectics as a means of reprocessing nuclear fuels. It would be, however, a very different ballgame.
4dog
(520 posts)until I got to industry, which, at least in my corner, was much less careless.
TalenaGor
(1,123 posts)early 90's in the SF bay area - the shell one had two explosions while I was there - the first was way far from where I was but the second one knocked me out of my chair and things fell off the walls and desks - scary af!