Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Anthropology
Related: About this forumAn archeologist learned about Neanderthals (and ourselves) by digging in one cave for decades
He points to the way prehistoric Homo Sapien and Neanderthal crafts are vastly different. We might not know much about Neanderthals, he goes on, but through what they created, we can see something incredible. When you take Home Sapien tools made of flint, spanning tens of thousands of years, in different parts of the world, theyre always the same. Standardised. It cant be cultural. There was likely little contact between these different settlements. Theres something innate within the behaviour of Homo Sapiens within our behaviour to act and think in a certain way. Its in our nature. Neanderthal crafts, though, dont share this pattern of standardisation. Look carefully at Neanderthal tools and weapons. Theyre all unique. Study thousands and youll find each is completely different. My colleagues never realised that. But when I did, I saw there was a deep divergence in the way Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals each understand the world.
Snip:
Slimak feels this comparison can and should be made with Neanderthals. Their tools and weapons are more unique than ours. As creatures, they were far more creative than us. Sapiens are efficient. Collective. We think the same, and dont like divergence. And I dont just mean western culture. Go to any Aboriginal society: there are clear rules and customs, and shared styles of clothing. Expectation to act in a certain manner; to follow regulations. Our ancestors, he says, lived like this instinctively. You dont see that with Neanderthals. By seeing Neanderthals as a reference point against which we can measure ourselves, Slimak reckons humanity is offered a gift: We have an opportunity to look in a mirror and see ourselves for what we truly are. To help us redefine, which we must do urgently.
The way he sees it, this isnt just an interesting philosophical theory. Neanderthals vanished, I think, because of high human efficiency. And this efficiency now threatens to destroy us, too. Thats whats killing the planets biodiversity. For Slimak, The Naked Neanderthal isnt a history book. Its about us in the present. Urging humanity to see itself for what it is by comparing us to something else, in the hope of changing the course of our future. Because by understanding our nature and the risk this efficiency poses we can save ourselves from a similar fate. Over millennia, humankind has also developed an advanced, impressive technology and culture, of a type Neanderthals could never have imagined. So while there is something dangerous in our nature, as a collective we can control and reshape it. Understanding this is the key to humanitys future. Because if we dont think carefully, next time it wont be Neanderthals that our efficiency destroys, itll be humankind itself thats the victim.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/sep/10/ludovik-slimak-neanderthal-hunter-reinterprets-our-prehistory
Snip:
Slimak feels this comparison can and should be made with Neanderthals. Their tools and weapons are more unique than ours. As creatures, they were far more creative than us. Sapiens are efficient. Collective. We think the same, and dont like divergence. And I dont just mean western culture. Go to any Aboriginal society: there are clear rules and customs, and shared styles of clothing. Expectation to act in a certain manner; to follow regulations. Our ancestors, he says, lived like this instinctively. You dont see that with Neanderthals. By seeing Neanderthals as a reference point against which we can measure ourselves, Slimak reckons humanity is offered a gift: We have an opportunity to look in a mirror and see ourselves for what we truly are. To help us redefine, which we must do urgently.
The way he sees it, this isnt just an interesting philosophical theory. Neanderthals vanished, I think, because of high human efficiency. And this efficiency now threatens to destroy us, too. Thats whats killing the planets biodiversity. For Slimak, The Naked Neanderthal isnt a history book. Its about us in the present. Urging humanity to see itself for what it is by comparing us to something else, in the hope of changing the course of our future. Because by understanding our nature and the risk this efficiency poses we can save ourselves from a similar fate. Over millennia, humankind has also developed an advanced, impressive technology and culture, of a type Neanderthals could never have imagined. So while there is something dangerous in our nature, as a collective we can control and reshape it. Understanding this is the key to humanitys future. Because if we dont think carefully, next time it wont be Neanderthals that our efficiency destroys, itll be humankind itself thats the victim.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/sep/10/ludovik-slimak-neanderthal-hunter-reinterprets-our-prehistory
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1193 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An archeologist learned about Neanderthals (and ourselves) by digging in one cave for decades (Original Post)
70sEraVet
Sep 2023
OP
Lovie777
(14,999 posts)1. The present Human Beings apparently back then were more into adapting...............................
to their environment. The Neanderthals per se were not.
Kinda sounds like the current GQP, RWers, etc. who prefers reverting back to the stone age, also I'll say they do like space.
Random Boomer
(4,249 posts)2. That may be a valid theory, but it's not the theory proposed in the OP.
Slimak theorizes that it was human efficiency, rather than adaptability, that gave our species the edge to out-compete Neanderthals.
It's an interesting new take on this old mystery.