Anthropology
Related: About this forumThe Native Americans Before the Native Americans
RAZIB KHAN FEBRUARY 1, 2024
National Park Service/Scientists working to uncover footprints at White Sands National Park field site
In 2021, scientists radiocarbon-dated pollen found in human footprints at the White Sands National Park in New Mexico and came back with dates of greater than 20,000 years. Critics demanded more evidence, and in 2023, using new data and more advanced methods seems to have confirmed the date. Though there are still skeptics, the White Sands discovery is not the only site that dates to the Last Glacial Maximum between 20-26,000 years ago.
For decades, paleoanthropologists believed the ancestors of American natives were a Siberian tribe that came over from Asia to North America just 13,500 years ago, crossing over Beringia, a landmass exposed by sharply reduced sea levels during the last Ice Age. They called these people the Clovis Culture based on distinct spear points first discovered next to the remains of mammoths at a site in New Mexico. The paradigm posited that over 300 years these big game hunters spread across the New World, driving megafauna into extinction and eventually diversifying into the people we know today as Native Americans.
Yet, already 25 years ago, the evidence contradicting this paradigm became quite strong. There were too many sites that predated Clovis by centuries. Monte Verde in Chile, where archaeologists have been excavating since 1977, is extensively documented and is over 1000 years older than Clovis. In Mexico, Chiquihuite Cave has yielded 1900 stone artifacts, and dates were returned as early as 31-33,000 years ago, long before the Last Glacial Maximum. Being more conservative, the researchers at this site are convinced that humans were claiming it 20,000 years ago at the latest. These dates imply that this population, presumably part of the same group that was leaving footprints at White Sands National Park, arrived much earlier because the expansion of the ice sheets beginning 26,000 years ago definitively blocked the interior migration path and would have made a sea-borne route along the western periphery very difficult as glaciers pushed to the edge of the Pacific.
In 2014, geneticists discovered and sequenced the 24,000-year-old remains of a boy who died on the shores of Lake Baikal and concluded that people related to him contributed 10-15% of the ancestry of modern Europeans and 40% of the ancestry of Native Americans. In one fell swoop, earlier anthropological and genetic suspicions of connections between the two populations were explained. Then, in 2015, the same group of geneticists found that some tribes in the Amazon had ancestry which tied them more closely to Australian Aboriginals and Papuans than to Siberians! This seemed to be a crazy result, but follow-up work not only confirms its correctness, but shows that this exotic ancestry is found across the central band of South America, from the coast into the Amazon.
More:
https://www.palladiummag.com/2024/02/01/the-native-americans-before-the-native-americans/
Bayard
(24,145 posts)Thanks, Judi Lynn.
riversedge
(73,132 posts)jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Solly Mack
(92,823 posts)CaptainTruth
(7,221 posts)niyad
(119,939 posts)point, almost everything we THINK we know from pre-written history, every assumption, will be proven wrong.
erronis
(16,863 posts)And, I suspect, that is why people of a conservative bent don't like science - they prefer to have known knowns, especially if preached to them.
pandr32
(12,174 posts)I must say, though--we have changed the stories of humans considerably since I took anthropology classes at university. The exciting part is that there will be more discoveries and we will learn more!
willamette
(182 posts)Judi Lynn
(162,385 posts)I can't wait until researchers really, really go after learning more about them. Clearly there's so much to learn ahead!
Thank you, so much.
(I have read that in a certain era some Maya considered crossed-eyes intriguing and developed devices to help train them to acquire a semi-crossed affect!)
willamette
(182 posts)in a museum in Mexico city. I had never even heard about the Olmecs and their strikingly different facial characteristics. There has been a huge controversy about trying to prove that there were never any African settlers in America ~4000 years ago. This spreading of humans around the globe is fascinating.
orangecrush
(21,802 posts)Your posts!
Judi Lynn
(162,385 posts)raging moderate
(4,502 posts)He had done some digging in South America. He said the evidence was not yet very strong, but he suspected something like this had happened.
Ponietz
(3,307 posts)Judi Lynn
(162,385 posts)Really looking forward to watching it this evening. Thank you for sharing it.
Judi Lynn
(162,385 posts)Thank you for your input.
BComplex
(9,078 posts)Thanks again for bringing us these amazing discoveries!
70sEraVet
(4,145 posts)Being tired at the end of the day, is no time to stretch the limits of one's understanding!
Thanks for presenting this to us!
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,588 posts)Hekate
(94,682 posts)I absolutely love this. I have long wondered about the features of the Olmec heads they didnt quite look African to me, and at the same time, among the many people of Mexican descent in SoCal, I have never seen an approximation of those features. Now I read that it just depends on where you look (as in quite a bit further South) and that DNA confirms it.
I really should remember to drop in here more often, rather than obsessing about politics.
Thank you!