Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Anthropology
Related: About this forumStunning image reveals Revolutionary War soldier whose bones were found in N.J. field
Composite sketch of one of the soldiers prepared by artist Moises Martinez of the New Jersey State Police Forensic Technology Center.
Rob Jennings | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
Two years after an archeological dig accidentally uncovered skeletal remains in a New Jersey field, there is now a face to help tell the story of what happened on a key Revolutionary War battlefield in 1777.
Working off of a skull recovered from a trench just outside Red Bank Battlefield Bank, a New Jersey State Police artist sketched one of the Hessian soldiers who died fighting for Great Britain against the Continental Army.
Scientists now believe 15 sets of skeletal remains, all from men, were located in the trench during the 2022 dig. DNA testing so far has failed to identify any of the soldiers, but that remains a goal of the ongoing research project, officials said Wednesday in an update on the discovery.
The newly-released image by artist Moises Martinez of the State Polices forensic technology center includes a headdress and a mustache, both of which were associated with Hessian soldiers of that period. The rendering helps convey the humanity of those who were killed, said Jen Janofsky, director of Red Bank Battlefield Park.
https://www.nj.com/news/2024/07/stunning-image-reveals-revolutionary-war-soldier-whose-bones-were-found-in-nj-field.html
(paywall)
The Red Bank location is in Gloucester County, NJ, not the Red Bank in Monmouth County.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 894 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stunning image reveals Revolutionary War soldier whose bones were found in N.J. field (Original Post)
Wicked Blue
Aug 2024
OP
bucolic_frolic
(47,137 posts)1. It's entirely possible the could ID the guy
Today's DNA tech you only need one or two people in a family tree to ID an unknown.
Census lists of Hessians who settled in NJ exist in the earliest censuses. Seems I recall reading officers were retained for awhile.
Irish_Dem
(58,324 posts)4. You need some close matches in the family tree.
At least second or third cousin. To ID an unknown.
With two known distant matches we can get a sense of geographical birth location, family's country of origin, ethnicity, etc. But not identity.
If this man had been an American, we would be able to identify him.
But obviously there must not be any offspring here in the US.
SARose
(830 posts)2. Oh wow!
That is unreal. Wig and all. Thanks!😊
Irish_Dem
(58,324 posts)3. He obviously did not leave any DNA in the US connected to procreation.