but I like the first amendment more.

But but but islamophobia !!1!

The hate speech used by the pope (like comparing gender theory to Hitler Youth propaganda) is not extremist enough for some.

Stopits!

Even when a homophobic bigots' beliefs motivate them to compare same sex marriage to pedophilia, incest and bestiality.

Must. Not. Mock. Believers.

They deserve our respect.

Does this mean Scientologists, Raelians, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Snake Handlers are off limits? Not to mention ALL creationists?

When we mock religion it's bigotry, when they do it it's...well it's just different.

Because reasons.

He is my leader and requires me to support him in everything he does and says. Urp

I just found out.

All hail our Atheist Holy Men!

Kadwins loves you, my childe!

He was quite the looker back in the day.

[url=http://postimg.org/image/46h745vox/full/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://postimage.org/][/url]

Reminds me a bit of David Tennant

Both of you are obviously rich privileged racist/sexist/ableist old white men pretending to be women to cause trouble. Nope, that "...goddess" nym didn't fool me for a minute.

You're both being watched and will be reported to the Authority of the Perpetually Aggrieved.

You saw through the whole thing.

This poll is really an homage to obviously rich privileged racist/sexist/ableist old white men.

I'm sure it's being scoured for offendable content as we type.

I'm actually an old, white privileged, sexist, ablest, genius, dead man

Trying to keep that quiet, eh? Too late - we know all about the Intergalactic Jewish/lluminati/Atheist Conspiracy. And the Lizard Persons.

Stop reading my thoughts! I see your drones!

Rofl

They are despicable bigots. They are the very epitome of violent fear tactics.

And yet, they are still allowed to march in Washington and say their despicable bigoted bullshit.

I guess they should expect African Americans to shoot the place up because bigotry.

When Neo Nazis are allowed to march and spread their hatred, they should expect Jews (and African Americans again) to shoot them up because bigotry.

So, when one of these yahoos (just Google some of the Republican candidates' stance on atheism) starts spouting their anti-atheist crap, do we get a pass if we were to shoot the place up? No, I don't think we would.

The first amendment does not protect just the speech we like. It protects it ALL. Some of that speech, I find hurtful and some of it angers me... most of the shit Geller said included. BUT they still get to say it because that's what is guaranteed by our constitution.

Killing someone over words or cartoons or anything else that angers you IS ON THE KILLERS. Fuck that noise that says that they lacked all self control because they were provoked. REALLY??? In any other arena than religion that shit would so not fly. If an African American shot up a gathering of the KKK, the most likely result would be the blame would rest squarely on them and NO ONE would say "well, they were provoked.".

I'm just gobsmacked to see how much twisting goes on to protect religion from the very same rules and regulations that govern ALL other areas of our lives.

If I see some Republican talking about women as if we were no better than cattle, I do not get to shoot them. I just don't, no matter how much it hurts, scares or angers me.

But I'm told that Geller is so much worse because she targets only one group - iow, she's picking on religious people so it's not fair.

The people who want certain kinds of speech banned are clueless, claiming provocation is "incitement" because someone went off the deep end and shot at a hate group.

Incitement is encouraging your followers to commit violent acts.

You don't get to shoot at the person who hurt your fee fees and then have them arrested for provoking you. That's not incitement, it's a severe lack of coping skills.


Why is that so hard for some to understand?