Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumThis Week in God.... (Maddow blog)
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/week-god-53015?cid=sm_fb_maddowFirst up from the God Machine this week is an unexpected scriptural debate over how to read one of the more widely known verses in the Christian Bible.
Matthew 25:40 includes a phrase that many have likely heard, regardless of their faith tradition: Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me. The phrasing is generally seen as championing the needs of the poor to turn your back on those struggling is to turn your back on God.
But my colleague Will Femia this week flagged an amazing report from Glenn Becks conservative website, The Blaze, which put an incredible twist on Biblical interpretation.
Denny Burk, professor of Biblical Studies at Boyce College in Louisville, Kentucky, most certainly isnt the first to make the claim that the least of these is actually a reference to Christians who face struggles in sharing their faith, but his stated view on the matter is the most recent proclamation to spark interpretive discussion.
This text is not about poor people generally. Its about Christians getting the door slammed in their face while sharing the gospel with a neighbor, Burk wrote. Its about the baker/florist/photographer who is being mistreated for bearing faithful witness to Christ. Its about disciples of Jesus having their heads cut off by Islamic radicals.
I see. So, against the backdrop of the right-to-discriminate debate, conservatives want the least of these to refer to themselves.
(continues at link)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1480 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Week in God.... (Maddow blog) (Original Post)
AlbertCat
May 2015
OP
RussBLib
(9,666 posts)1. now THAT is blasphemy
the casualness with which they redefine the Babble is breathtaking in its arrogance and impudence.
Thanks for posting these. I often forget to check that one. So many things to remember...
mr blur
(7,753 posts)2. There is nothing that these greedy idiots won't twist to make it justify their bigotry (nt)
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)4. That's the great thing about the bible. You can read it however you want.
There is some manner of biblical precedent for their interpretation, although perhaps not what they intended.
Jesus really didn't give a shit about gentiles. On a few occasions he would do them a favor, but his teachings were directed at Jews, because after all Christ was a Jew and a Rabbi. So his "brothers and sisters" actually meant the Jews, which also kinda leaves Christians out in the cold.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)3. “least of these” is actually a reference to Christians
Can there be Christians before Christ is resurrected?
Isn't Christ a Jew at this point?
And of course...
Why do you think it's all about "me...Me.....ME....."?