Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,033 posts)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:09 AM Feb 2016

Put an Atheist on the Supreme Court (Krauss)

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/put-an-atheist-on-the-supreme-court?intcid=mod-yml


Put an Atheist on the Supreme Court
February 18, 2016
By Lawrence M. Krauss

Who should replace Antonin Scalia? On Monday, the Times reported that the Justice himself had weighed in on the question: last June, in his dissenting opinion in the same-sex marriage case Obergefell v. Hodges, Scalia wrote that the Court was “strikingly unrepresentative” of America as a whole and ought to be diversified. He pointed out that four of the Justices are natives of New York City, that none are from the Southwest (or are “genuine” Westerners), and that all of them attended law school at Harvard or Yale. Moreover, Scalia wrote, there is “not a single evangelical Christian (a group that comprises about one quarter of Americans), or even a Protestant of any denomination” on the Court. (All nine Justices are, to varying degrees, Catholic or Jewish.)

Scalia’s remarks imply that an evangelical Christian should be appointed to the Court. That’s a strange idea: surely, the separation of church and state enshrined in the Constitution strongly suggests that court decisions shouldn’t be based on religious preference, or even on religious arguments. The Ten Commandments are reserved for houses of worship; the laws of the land are, or should be, secular. Still, I’m inclined, in my own way, to agree with Scalia’s idea about diversity. My suggestion is that the next Supreme Court Justice be a declared atheist.

Atheists are a significantly underrepresented minority in government. According to recent findings from the Pew Research Center, about twenty-three per cent of American adults declare that they have no religious affiliation—which is two percentage points more than the number who declare themselves Catholic. Three per cent of Americans say that they are atheists—which means that there are more atheists than Jews in the United States. An additional four per cent declare themselves agnostic; as George Smith noted in his classic book “Atheism: The Case Against God,” agnostics are, for practical purposes, atheists, since they cannot declare that they believe in a divine creator. Even so, not a single candidate for major political office or Supreme Court Justice has “come out” declaring his or her non-belief.



Thurgood Marshall (liberal) was replaced by Clarence Thomas (not liberal), so a logical argument could be made to replace Scalia (religious) with an atheist (not religious).

Just sayin'
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Put an Atheist on the Supreme Court (Krauss) (Original Post) NeoGreen Feb 2016 OP
K&R good thought! Mbrow Feb 2016 #1
and then.... SCantiGOP Feb 2016 #2
I am more than OK with there being an atheist on the court Gore1FL Feb 2016 #3
You can bet your last dollar that if an atheist is nominated... MindPilot Feb 2016 #4
A liberal one, please awoke_in_2003 Feb 2016 #5

Gore1FL

(21,896 posts)
3. I am more than OK with there being an atheist on the court
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 09:28 PM
Feb 2016

But that is a religious test and those are illegal.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
4. You can bet your last dollar that if an atheist is nominated...
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:53 AM
Feb 2016

there will be some testy religionists.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Put an Atheist on the Sup...