Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

DetlefK

(16,455 posts) Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:43 AM Apr 2013

Mix the Bible and Electric Universe in a bowl, stir...

...and you will be able to disprove that our Sun is a star, whereupon our entire cosmological model collapses.

http://www.geocities.com/rebornempowered/thesun.htm
Quote: " To admit this, for the scientific world, is clearly NOT an option, so more time and money will be spent on trying to KEEP GOD OUT of the equation."

If God is part of the equation, shouldn't he arise as a part of physics even if we exclude the Bible as reference?

Btw, the "missing Neutrinos"-problem he cites was actually solved about 10 years ago. (And it's really a third as many as expected, not half as many. That's how crappy his source is.)

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mix the Bible and Electric Universe in a bowl, stir... (Original Post) DetlefK Apr 2013 OP

"The goal of this paper is to prove, using only the Bible, that the Sun is NOT a star." DavidDvorkin Apr 2013 #1

New Scientific Evidence About Stars... SwissTony Apr 2013 #2

DavidDvorkin

(19,889 posts)

1. "The goal of this paper is to prove, using only the Bible, that the Sun is NOT a star."

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:59 AM

Apr 2013

There's no point in reading beyond that statement.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)

2. New Scientific Evidence About Stars...

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Sun Apr 21, 2013, 06:26 AM

Apr 2013

and he cites a privately published monograph from 1944!!!!! New indeed.

His "difference" between the sun and the stars is actually an argument against the bible.

When the stars fall, where will they fall to?

To be fair to him, this drivel is 10 years old, so he may have missed the neutrinos.

Reply to this discussion