Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
Thu Oct 17, 2013, 02:00 PM Oct 2013

Skull of Homo erectus throws story of human evolution into disarray

The spectacular fossilised skull of an ancient human ancestor that died nearly two million years ago in central Asia has forced scientists to rethink the story of early human evolution.

Anthropologists unearthed the skull at a site in Dmanisi, a small town in southern Georgia, where other remains of human ancestors, simple stone tools and long-extinct animals have been dated to 1.8m years old.

Experts believe the skull is one of the most important fossil finds to date, but it has proved as controversial as it is stunning. Analysis of the skull and other remains at Dmanisi suggests that scientists have been too ready to name separate species of human ancestors in Africa. Many of those species may now have to be wiped from the textbooks.

The latest fossil is the only intact skull ever found of a human ancestor that lived in the early Pleistocene, when our predecessors first walked out of Africa. The skull adds to a haul of bones recovered from Dmanisi that belong to five individuals, most likely an elderly male, two other adult males, a young female and a juvenile of unknown sex.

<snip>


http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/17/skull-homo-erectus-human-evolution
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Skull of Homo erectus throws story of human evolution into disarray (Original Post) mr blur Oct 2013 OP
And for you visiting teabaggers... Turbineguy Oct 2013 #1
Interesting, back to clumping vs splitting species? Mark to read later. uppityperson Oct 2013 #2
"And we'll shut down this clade if we don't get our way!" nt eppur_se_muova Oct 2013 #3
.???? uppityperson Oct 2013 #4
If the unending lumper/splitter debate followed the same course as Congressional debate ... nt eppur_se_muova Oct 2013 #5
The human fossil record is skimpy evidently because they were tasty. dimbear Oct 2013 #6

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
6. The human fossil record is skimpy evidently because they were tasty.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 04:47 PM
Oct 2013

A good place to look is the floor of caves that once belonged to big cats, but the bones tend to look gnawed.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Skull of Homo erectus thr...