Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 08:25 AM Jan 2014

Researchers dismiss sixth sense – and put their faith in common sense

Australian survey finds people can reliably detect a change in surroundings, even if they cannot accurately describe it

If you can eerily detect the presence of unseen people or have prescient knowledge of danger, it may be disappointing to learn that scientists have ruled out the existence of a “sixth sense”.

A year-long University of Melbourne study, published in the journal Plos One, found that people could reliably detect a change in their surroundings, even if they could not accurately describe what that change was.

However, the research concluded that this was not due to any kind of supernatural ability, but rather from cues picked up from more conventional senses such as sight.

Researchers presented pairs of photos of a woman to 48 different people. In some cases, the appearance of the woman in one of the pictures would be different – such as a different hairstyle or the presence of glasses.

The pictures were shown to the subjects for 1.5 seconds with a one-second break between them. The people were then asked whether a change had occurred and, if so, to pick the change from a list of nine possibilities.

The results showed that while the subjects could “sense” a change had occurred, they could not verbalise what it was. While this confirmed to some subjects that they possessed a sixth sense, or extrasensory perception, researchers said it showed there was no such ability

<snip>


http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/14/researchers-dismiss-sixth-sense

I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Researchers dismiss sixth sense – and put their faith in common sense (Original Post) mr blur Jan 2014 OP
Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi...nt uriel1972 Jan 2014 #1
Well, I prefer to put my faith in common sense, too, but... William Seger Jan 2014 #2
Thhink about all the times you've been thinking about someone... Archae Jan 2014 #3
Ain't it weird that no illusionist claims to be a magician? DetlefK Jan 2014 #4

William Seger

(11,036 posts)
2. Well, I prefer to put my faith in common sense, too, but...
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 10:04 AM
Jan 2014

... the logic of the conclusion here seems to be flawed, at least as it's stated in this article. Proving that people can "detect a change in surroundings, even if they cannot accurately describe it" is not surprising, but it doesn't really "rule out" being able to also detect things through "extrasensory" means. My common sense says that I shouldn't believe that's possible unless and until someone reliably demonstrates it under controlled conditions, but saying that this study proves non-existence is overstating the case.

Archae

(46,798 posts)
3. Thhink about all the times you've been thinking about someone...
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 02:21 PM
Jan 2014

And they call you.

Now you'll remember that, but how many MORE times do you think about someone, and they don't call?

DetlefK

(16,455 posts)
4. Ain't it weird that no illusionist claims to be a magician?
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 07:29 AM
Jan 2014

They pull the weirdest, mind-bending tricks and yet none of those "super-beings" claims to have super-natural powers. (Well, Uri Geller claimed that and it ended in utter humiliation.)

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Researchers dismiss sixth...