ALIEN STAR SHIPS hidden in plain sight with Robert Evans
http://starshipsaroundthesun.com/
okay, this is really wild!
Archae
(46,807 posts)These ditwits like Lopez, and George Noory aren't even fun any more.
They just repeat each other, "Da troof is bein' civvered up!"
yuiyoshida
(42,722 posts)are intriguing but I think perhaps he is jumping to conclusions about what things are.. he mentions some other things too that were pushing my doubt buttons.. but hey, its his opinion and NASA refuses to answer inquiries does not surprise me.
Archae
(46,807 posts)He reminds me of the guy who follows Apollo astronauts around demanding they swear on the Bible, and even IF they do, he still claims they are lying about being to the Moon.
Buzz Aldrin got mad at him and slugged him after he called Aldrin a liar.
This was at the UFO nut's website:
"In 1954, US President Eisenhower, planned a secret meeting with 3 Alien Races at what used to be known as MUROC Air Field, now known as Edwards Air Force Base."
The usual "big conspiracy" BS, long on accusation and storytelling, but empty on facts.
yuiyoshida
(42,722 posts)How can anyone make the huge leap that these anomalies are star ships, with "phaser beams" being shot out at other ships..etc.. it makes it sound like there is a battle going on around the sun. While all of that is the stuff of Science Fiction, that's ALL that it is... wild guessing and speculation. None of it is proof that it is anything more than anomalies.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)The same way they jump to ancient explanations of things, like ghosts or demons or gods.
(How can anyone listen to that baloney for a hour or more?????)
yuiyoshida
(42,722 posts)30 minutes .. tops.. but I was curious ..as to what this guy had to say, and if he is some so called expert (which clearly he is not) what he was pushing. Frankly I don't know what any of this stuff is, and neither does NASA...so why would he think they were Klingons or whatever...
zappaman
(20,617 posts)William Seger
(11,043 posts)Planets, cosmic ray hits, software glitches, detector defects, and debris: http://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2003_01_17/