Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,798 posts)
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 12:27 AM Dec 2015

The worst anti-science websites on the web

I keep seeing these sites used as "references."

Brian Dunning has updated his list of Top-10 Worst Anti-Science Web Sites, five of which provide low-quality health information and advice:

Natural News (promoted conspiracy theories that medical industry secretly wants to keep everyone sick, and conspires with the food industry to make people unhealthy, all driven by a massive plot of greed to sell poisonous medicines)
Mercola.com (aggressive promotion of "quack medical products&quot
DoctorOz.com (his web site is little more than "clickbait luring people . . . who might be looking for actual health advice to click on ads for Dr. Oz's "trusted sponsorship partners.&quot
Foodbabe.com (her advice is "a crap shoot of common knowledge, fearmongering, gross scientific illiteracy, misinformation, and ideological nonsense.&quot
Chopra.com ("claiming ayurvedic medical benefits from what amounts to little more than spiritualist word-salad mumbo jumbo, " including "'detoxification' . . . an implausible spiritual solution to a nonexistent physical problem."

https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4495

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The worst anti-science websites on the web (Original Post) Archae Dec 2015 OP
How about the Alex Jones Website? A fact free zone if there ever was one. yellowcanine Dec 2015 #1
Jones' site is listed in the article, it's #4. Archae Dec 2015 #2
So it is. I didn't actually look at the list. Thanks. yellowcanine Dec 2015 #3
Good list... LeftishBrit Dec 2015 #4
Apparently Mercola has a pet version too. progressoid Dec 2015 #5

yellowcanine

(36,336 posts)
3. So it is. I didn't actually look at the list. Thanks.
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 11:56 AM
Dec 2015

Glad to see someone is going after the conspiracy mongers as well as the food faddists and antivaxxers.

progressoid

(50,743 posts)
5. Apparently Mercola has a pet version too.
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 04:40 PM
Dec 2015

My wife was looking for something for our cats and ran across it. When I pointed out that Mercola was a quack, she moved on.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»The worst anti-science we...