Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progressoid

(50,743 posts)
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 03:53 PM Sep 2016

"We don't like that the evidence fails to support our beliefs, so we want you to stop talking about



A Letter to Cornell: Please Stop Sciencing.


A letter arrived on Cornell University Dean Kathryn Boor's desk this week. The same letter was sent to the Board of Trustees. Sixty-seven people from New York State's organic farming community requested that the dean give the Cornell Alliance for Science the boot from the campus. They feel that such efforts have "no place at a Land Grant institution."

Alliance for Silence?

I'm familiar with the Alliance for Science and have even participated in their training sessions and discussions. I'm know what it is, what it isn't. It is stunning to me that people would complain to university administration that the exchange of scholarly ideas regarding agricultural technology would be objectionable. Well, maybe not so stunning.



The headlines at Sustainable Pulse present the argument against Alliance for Science. It is, "We don't like that the evidence fails to support our beliefs, so we want you to stop talking about it."


...http://kfolta.blogspot.com/2016/09/a-letter-to-cornell-please-stop.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"We don't like that the evidence fails to support our beliefs, so we want you to stop talking about (Original Post) progressoid Sep 2016 OP
Why am I not surprised... Archae Sep 2016 #1
What scoundrels ! Joe Chi Minh Oct 2016 #3
The organic industry makes fools of the left. ZombieHorde Sep 2016 #2
The Alliance for Science is funded with $5.6M from Gates Foundation kristopher Oct 2016 #4

Archae

(46,797 posts)
1. Why am I not surprised...
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 04:09 PM
Sep 2016

The organic industry is making HUGE profits, overcharging for their food.

They don't want competition.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
4. The Alliance for Science is funded with $5.6M from Gates Foundation
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 11:12 PM
Oct 2016

Gates Foundation also owns substantial interests in both Monsanto and Cargill.

The Alliance's mission is to promote the use of GMO by training local spokespersons.

How much allegiance will $5.6M buy from impoverished 3rd world farmers?

How much carefully tailored "science" will such generosity buy from Cornell?



"Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience"

It looks like a grass tops recruiting endeavor.

In case you don't know about this recently developed corporate lobbying strategy:

Top 5 Tips for Being a Grasstops Organizing Rockstar
AYELET HINES

Back in the day, grasstops organizing referred to “Astroturf” lobbying, or fake grassroots lobbying performed by citizens and community leaders who had been bought off by well-funded corporate interests, named after the rootless, fake grass laid down in football stadiums and front porches throughout Washington, DC. Plenty of corporations that don’t act in the best interest of the public still have very active fake “citizen-based” campaigns.

But you can kick some serious campaign ass if you know how to plan and execute a successful grasstops strategy by covering these five bases...
http://change-university.com/rockstar/

Drinker Biddle & Reath cultivates the ‘grass tops’ over grass roots
By Catherine Ho November 18, 2012
Annette Iacono, vice president of a small clinical laboratory in Brookhaven, Pa., joked to lobbyist Erin Will Morton, “Have you reached puberty yet?”

Iacono and Morton, a health care lobbyist at Drinker Biddle & Reath, were role-playing what might happen the next day when Iacono headed to Capitol Hill to meet with lawmakers about cuts in Medicare payments to labs that could hurt her business. Iacono was making light of a common misstep — being dismissive of youthful-looking congressional staffers — and the exchange was part of a training session Morton and fellow lobbyist Julie Scott Allen put on last week for 40 managers of small and mid-size laboratories on how to meet with elected officials.

The 90-minute crash course is part of a multi-pronged advocacy campaign Morton and Allen designed for the National Independent Laboratory Association, a trade group that represents small clinical labs. It is centered around the idea that lawmakers may respond better to voters and their personal stories than they might to a paid lobbyist.

Drinker Biddle, whose 20-member lobby shop specializes in health care, has long offered such training to clients, for years holding similar sessions for several hundred people at a time before they were to meet with Congress members. But Drinker Biddle’s smaller, targeted training with NILA is part of the firm’s push to fine-tune this approach by zeroing in on a subset of constituents from specific states and districts whose interests align with those of the lawmakers they’re meeting with. Iacona, for example, runs the Pennsylvania-based Brookside Clinical Laboratory — which serves patients in Delaware — so the firm helped set up meetings between Iacona and representatives from both states.

“It used to be the focus was bringing in 100 to 500 people from across the country, doing a big training, then blitzing the Hill,” said Ilisa Halpern Paul, who chairs the lobby group at Drinker Biddle. “We still do that ... However, we’ve added hand-picking advocates from a particular set of districts or states and doing a very tailored, more intensive training with them.”

Grass roots gives way to ‘grass tops’
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»"We don't like that the e...