Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gravitational fields, silkworm excrement, and "putor" programs. In a peer-reviewed journal.
Springer Nature flushed any reputation for quality control down the toilet. It took them a year to retract a paper on "Development of a safe antiparasitic against scuticociliates (Miamiensis avidus) in olive flounders: new approach to reduce the toxicity of mebendazole by material remediation technology using full-overlapped gravitational field energy":
Sometimes, a paper comes along that is so revolutionary, it defies description. So rather than try to do justice to a recent paper in Parasitology Research, well reproduce a few paragraphs here:
Unfortunately, the paper, originally published on July 21, 2018, no longer receives energy, because it was retracted. Heres the retraction notice:
We asked the journals editors, Una Ryan of Murdoch University in Australia and Julia Walochnik of the Medical University of Vienna, why it took post-publication peer review to determine that the paper was nonsense. In other words, what exactly were the peer reviewers, editors, and publisher thats Springer Nature doing between March 5, 2018, when the paper was submitted, and July 6, 2018, when it was accepted?
The editors did not respond, but apparently forwarded our email to Springer Nature. A spokesperson for the publisher responded:
https://retractionwatch.com/2019/07/23/gravitational-fields-fish-excrement-and-putor-programs-how-did-this-pure-utter-nonsense-get-into-in-a-peer-reviewed-journal/
A certain point between the center of the earth and the center of a certain outer planet is where the gravities of each interact, where their energies are exchanged, and also where numerous other gravities are working. Therefore, matter composed of elements at this point could receive FOGF energy, named Dong-ta-ra-con-ching, and in turn more energy will be received by rotation and revolution of the earth. In order to induce this energy into matter, we developed the material remediation installation Putor (Fig. 2), which could force synchronization in MBZ, make MBZ normally receive FOGF energy, and reduce toxicity of MBZ. It consisted of the Eup-cha and the Nap-cha putor program. The Eup-cha putor program induces energy from the center of the earth, whereas the Nap-cha putor program amplifies numerous weak extraterrestrial energies using natural matter, silkworm. To treat MBZ, the Eup-cha putor program was installed under MBZ and the Nap-cha putor program was installed over MBZ.
The principle of this Putor installation is briefly explained. As mentioned in the introduction, elements on the earth receive FOGF energy, and thus living organisms comprised of these elements are also expected to receive FOGF energy. We investigated the capacities of FOGF energy reception in various living organisms, and finally we chose the silkworm because it seemed to receive energy almost all day. We raised them, studied their properties every spring and autumn for 15 years, and could obtain the suitable silkworm, named Ho-ho-nong, for our purpose. Silkworm excrement was the most appropriate because it was not denatured easily, unlike other parts such as heads, skins, and silk glands that are composed of protein. However, silkworm excrement alone was not enough to remediate the destroyed elements, and therefore we placed the excrement at the top and the bottom of several trees and induced amplification, using the energy reception ability of the trees. The Nap-cha and the Eup-cha putor programs of the material remediation installation Putor were produced using this procedure.
Unfortunately, the paper, originally published on July 21, 2018, no longer receives energy, because it was retracted. Heres the retraction notice:
This article has been retracted at the request of the Editors-in-Chief and the Publisher. Post publication peer review has found that the conclusions regarding the phenomenon of full-overlapped gravitational field (FOGF) energy are not supported by evidence. In addition, the supplementary file has been removed as it was published in error. All authors agree to this retraction.
We asked the journals editors, Una Ryan of Murdoch University in Australia and Julia Walochnik of the Medical University of Vienna, why it took post-publication peer review to determine that the paper was nonsense. In other words, what exactly were the peer reviewers, editors, and publisher thats Springer Nature doing between March 5, 2018, when the paper was submitted, and July 6, 2018, when it was accepted?
The editors did not respond, but apparently forwarded our email to Springer Nature. A spokesperson for the publisher responded:
In the interests of being fair and following due process, the paper was sent for a post publication peer review, following which all authors agreed to retract the paper as stated in the retraction note. We treat all correspondence on integrity matters as confidential and cannot comment on details of the peer review process.
https://retractionwatch.com/2019/07/23/gravitational-fields-fish-excrement-and-putor-programs-how-did-this-pure-utter-nonsense-get-into-in-a-peer-reviewed-journal/
You'd have thought "gravitational field energy" in the title would have got any editor of a parasitology journal suspicious enough to at least read it before publishing it. Or any peer reviewers, if there really were any.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1639 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gravitational fields, silkworm excrement, and "putor" programs. In a peer-reviewed journal. (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2019
OP
GeorgeGist
(25,426 posts)1. Perhaps the reviewers were ...
suffering from neurocysticercosis.