Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,450 posts)
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 01:38 PM Jun 2022

Russian conspiracy-theory: Russia defeated Napoleon in 1812 with a nuclear bomb.



This is an actual russian conspiracy-theory. When Napoleon conquered Moscow in 1812, the Russians evacuated the population and set the whole city on fire, to deny Napoleon his victory of occupying the capital (and presumably to deny his army shelter during winter).

Well that's what "they" want you to think. What ACTUALLY happened is that Russia nuked Moscow. The evidence? Some russian politician bought a villa in France and supposedly found the diary of french officer in Napoleon's army. And in this diary, the officer basically describes a nuclear explosion and radiation-sickness. And Noooooooo, you cannot see the diary for yourself. Just trust me.





A russian colleague once told me another conspiracy-theory: The Ukraine-war that is going on right now is actually a plot by Poland to use Ukraine as a proxy to destroy Russia, and this sinister polish plot has been set into motion in 1800. The Polish just hate Russia. And that's why Russia is justified in invading Poland. Because Poland is and has always been the REAL aggressor and Russia is and has always been the REAL victim.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russian conspiracy-theory: Russia defeated Napoleon in 1812 with a nuclear bomb. (Original Post) DetlefK Jun 2022 OP
What are you drinking? brush Jun 2022 #1
I thought it funny enough when Erich von Daniken came up with the idea Warpy Jun 2022 #2
Well, to Erich's defense, PinkTiger Jul 2022 #3
Von Daniken has always been a con man, and liar. Archae Jul 2022 #4

Warpy

(113,093 posts)
2. I thought it funny enough when Erich von Daniken came up with the idea
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 05:31 PM
Jun 2022

to explain Tunguska about a century later. In fact, that made ten year old me realize how full of shit he was.

Here, conspiracy nuts are generally those who don't read/won't read. There, their access to information has been limited for a long time and even when it was a little more freely available, people weren't used to being able to access it and didn't. So they've got an excuse but we don't.

Putin's problem is that he falls into the "won't read" category, with the exception of bullshit from Oleksandr Dugin, someone whose lofty theories about Russia's exalted place in the world would make von Daniken blush but which Adolf Hitler would understand perfectly if you changed a few names.

PinkTiger

(2,593 posts)
3. Well, to Erich's defense,
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 12:20 AM
Jul 2022

It did resemble an air burst nuke; but of course, he couldn’t have known that. A broken clock,. . .

Archae

(46,748 posts)
4. Von Daniken has always been a con man, and liar.
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 10:45 AM
Jul 2022

His books use edited pictures to "prove" supposed "ancient astronauts."

Before he started in with his books, he was an embezzler who was diagnosed as a serial liar.

As to the Tunguska blast, all the actual evidence shows the blast to have been caused by a stony asteroid exploding in an airburst.

In 2013, a much smaller meteor blew up over Siberia, causing damage that sure looked like a bomb hit.

&ab_channel=Tuvix72
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Russian conspiracy-theory...