Solid to the core.

He and Wasserman go where corporate media will not go, truth to power.

I adore them both....such energy and passion.

He said -- repeatedly, no accident -- that they weren't going to be counted and that Bernie had really won.

Wrong. Every single one was checked ,almost all were eligible and counted, and Hillary still won.

In California, by law, all provisional ballots are counted after they are checked against the registration rolls. None are just set aside.

And can they do that?

Ordinary people just might be able to count some ballots independently, especially important if interested in more than just the presidential results.

As Optical Scan machines read a ballot, they capture an anonymous image of it. No personal information means there shouldn't be any legal reason to refuse to release the images.

Use a notarized FOIA request to election officials to demand the images of the election results you want. They could give in, refuse, drag it out ... so to get a yes or no as soon as possible, best to go in person. Take along at least two brand-new, still-wrapped flash drives to download the files. Count the votes & enter into a spreadsheet for tracking.

https://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/

1. Click on Wisconsin. (Then click on a specific county if you want its quick info.) Scroll down to "Search Equipment" dropdowns in lower left. Select Wisconsin, "Optical Scan" & 2016, and SEARCH.

https://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/#year/2016/state/55

2. See the 11-page list of Wisconsin cities/towns/villages which use the makes and various models of Optical Scan machines = Dominion, ES&S {Elections Systems & Software}, Premier/Diebold, Sequoia.

3. Explore "Security Concerns" for those Optical Scan models used in Wisconsin: scroll down & select each one in turn & see their vulnerabilities.

MAKE MODEL of OPTICAL SCAN
Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct
Election Systems & Software DS200
Election Systems & Software Model 100
Election Systems & Software Optech IIIP-Eagle
Premier/Diebold (Dominion) AccuVote OS
Sequoia (Dominion) Optech Insight

MAKES of DRE TOUCHSCREEN:
Premier/Diebold (Dominion) AccuVote TSX
Sequoia (Dominion) AVC Edge
Election Systems & Software iVotronic

4. See also other states' machines= in that "Search Equipment", select the state you want & SEARCH.

WTF?

What did he do to get blocked?

It's that rat bastard Trump who should be blocked by Twitter.

Are you sure?

Now, that statement has been removed.

Can they do that? What recourse does Stein and lawyers have?

Must be blocked for a reason - most votes stolen.

to the people who are actually counting them = very, very bad

Refusing to give access to ballots to observers from any party = good

Basically says all three states could be switched to Hillary in fair recount, and accounting of "uncounted spoiled ballots".

They don't count them, they dump them on arbitrary grounds like envelope labeling. It is possible to determine "voter intent" and count them if they tried.

As for provisional ballots, it varies from state to state. In Virginia, for example, I'm sure that most provisional ballots would reveal voter intent. But if the voter doesn't provide the required information by the deadline, the vote will be tossed.

Provisional ballots often require additional action on the part of the voter. If they don't do what is required, then of course the ballot won't be counted. And I believe federal law requires that anyone voting a provisional ballot has the right to inquire as to whether or not the ballot was counted.

Here in PA, the ballots come with a tracking bar code and the provisional voter gets a receipt portion of the ballot with the same bar code on it as is on the prov ballot. You can track the status of your ballot online.

Hope the lawyers have access to these ballots.

Say, for instance, someone checks the box for Hillary Clinton and then also writes her name in the the write-in area.

Should that vote count in your opinion? Is voter intent clear?

The machine counts the vote as an overvote when in fact it is a valid vote.

I watched the Al Frankenstein recount in pretty much real time. People do all sorts of stupid stuff that causes the machine to not count the votes.

If you check their name and write it also, I'd say that intent is more clear than that of someone who only checked the name....

but will do machine counts?

otherwise, a strange coincidence.

Observers sit across the table from workers who are counting ballots by hand (verifying whether the number of ballots in the bag matches the number of voters). The observers can point out ballots with problems that would need to be counted specially by hand. The ballots are then counted on a high-speed machine that separates out each candidate and counts the votes for each. Any ballots that are spit out of the machine as an undervote (machine does not detect any vote for president) will be remade on a blank ballot to show the voter's intent and put through the machine again to be counted.

the winner by his friends in high places.

Drumpt ran up such big numbers.

are some so rural that they maybe didn't have a Democratic party observer?

And in such a precinct, how hard would it really be to "help" some voters show up and vote-- like the ones who actually didn't? We're talking ballot-box stuffing...

The added "voters" would have to be registered and sign the poll book so that the post-election cross-checks match. Their votes would then appear on the state website (you can look up your voting history online). If these were for actual people who didn't vote, they would eventually know that their names had been used. Maybe some people would be willing to risk a felony conviction to get some number of extra votes for their favored candidate, but that's doubtful. It's the same reason that poor people actually don't vote several times for some relatively small payment.

But for many counties, the question would arise, why did the machine not spit back an overvote on election day? In counties that don't use machines, the poll workers should have already eliminated any overvotes during counting on election night.

but in Virginia, they aren't "spit back" for overvotes. The ballot goes into the machine, and the candidate for each race is credited for a vote, except for any race with an undervote or overvote. Overvotes and undervotes from tabulators aren't even looked at unless there is a hand recount.

Yet the results do not support a wave election. Observers are generally sent to large districts not smaller districts...and already some districts have changed their numbers in Wisconsin...and all mistakes favor Trump? They are also fighting the Michigan recount...very suspicious.

There is something hinky, we need to know!

Lawyers need to get there fast!

The nonsense that is clearly a big part of this election.

Bet these people NEVER THOUGHT there would be a recount. Bet they thought it was just all gonna be smooth as butter. I hope they get exposed and carted off to jail.

n/t.

A boy named SUE.