Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(73,132 posts)
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 04:01 PM Dec 2016

In nearly every swing state, voters preferred Hillary Clinton on the econom

More stats to boggle the mind.


Philip Bump Verified account
‏@pbump

As noted by @nycsouthpaw, voters worried about the economy -- most of them -- preferred Clinton.



The Fix
In nearly every swing state, voters preferred Hillary Clinton on the economy

By Philip Bump December 2

Anonymous Twitter dog @nycsouthpaw made an interesting observation on Friday.

The driving narrative for the results of the November election has run contrary to that. According to a broad swath of popular understanding, Donald Trump will be the next president because he narrowly won three critical states -- Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin -- powered by working class voters frustrated with economic intransigence.

But that's not what exit polling shows in those states, to Southpaw's point. Exit polls show Hillary Clinton winning a majority of the vote from people who told pollsters that the economy was the most important issue facing the country. What's more, in each state, a majority of voters said that was the case.





https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=480




The circles with bright red slices are those in which voters who thought the economy was the most important issue either preferred Trump or preferred both candidates equally. Those are all states that went for Trump. In every other state, voters most worried about the economy preferred Clinton, even though she lost eight of those states.

In nearly every state, Clinton did better (and Trump worse) with voters worried about the economy than with the overall pool of voters. (Notice how the blue slices in the smaller circles extend further than the blue slices in the larger ones.)...................


How can that be? How can she win a majority of the majority and still lose? Because she lost with other groups worse.
.............

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In nearly every swing state, voters preferred Hillary Clinton on the econom (Original Post) riversedge Dec 2016 OP
It WAS about bigotry. Terrorism and "the Wall" Immigration was where he won big. bettyellen Dec 2016 #1
yup as tim wise said the reason his supporters aRen't upset over JI7 Dec 2016 #2
Of course it was. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #3

JI7

(90,527 posts)
2. yup as tim wise said the reason his supporters aRen't upset over
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 04:36 PM
Dec 2016

the wealthy big business appoinments is because voted for trump over bigotry . Not economics.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
3. Of course it was.
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 06:11 PM
Dec 2016

As I've written several times, the "working class whites/economic messaging" narrative is ridiculous. It fails under scrutiny, withers under the weight of critical thought/analysis.

None of which is to say the Democratic Party doesn't have room for improvement.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»In nearly every swing sta...