positions on racism, sexism, and xenophobia.

People should be able to draw their own conclusions from that

Sid

Wish I could rec this a million times.

That whole family of Obama voters voted for Trump this time.

Great video. If Democrats ever want to win, everyone needs to listen to Van.

His 50 state approach is what is NEEDED.

Van is so right about the elitism in the Democratic Party. That attitude has turned many off and is responsible for driving rural voters straight to the GOP.

To be honest, that elitism attitude is a form of bigotry...with certain members looking down on and thinking they are better than others. It's disgusting and just as offensive as any other form of bigotry. It needs to stop.

Or the false narrative being presented by some.

Now voted for trump?

not necessarily just white males. But your post lacks evidence, here is some for you regarding Obama voters who voted Trump.

These former Obama strongholds sealed the election for Trump
By Kevin Uhrmacher, Kevin Schaul and Dan Keating
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/obama-trump-counties/

"Across swing states — and others previously thought to be safe for Democrats — Trump colored dozens of counties red that hadn’t gone Republican in decades.
....
Of the nearly 700 counties that twice sent Obama to the White House, a stunning one-third flipped to support Trump.
....
Trump also won 194 of the 207 counties that voted for Obama either in 2008 or 2012.
By contrast, of those 2,200 counties that never supported Obama, Clinton was only able to win six. That’s just 0.3 percent crossover to the Democratic side."

Trump counties where:
Obama won twice -- dark orange
Obama won once -- light orange
?c=353

some white male voters are a subset of voters who switched. Your logic is flawed. Of course, it is possible to approximate how many voters did the switch by a combination of corrected exit polls and actual vote numbers per location. Breakdown by ethnicity is possible as well. Because it is statistical it will not be 100% accurate, but the data will have a confidence margin strong enough to draw conclusions. Your post has no data, just statements of "fact" without support, and therefore is itself completely unsupported.