Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 08:34 AM Dec 2016

Mook: Clinton's 'deplorables' comment 'definitely could have alienated' voters

Mook: Clinton's 'deplorables' comment 'definitely could have alienated' voters
Eugene Scott
CNN

Hillary Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook acknowledged the former secretary of state calling half of Donald Trump's supporters "deplorables" alienated voters, saying that's why the Democratic presidential nominee publicly expressed regret over the remarks so quickly thereafter.

"Hillary apologized right away after that and said that she misspoke and that she regretted the comment. That's something that Donald Trump wouldn't do, you know," he told CNN's Jake Tapper during a special edition of CNN's "State of the Union," filmed at Harvard University's Institute of Politics in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The event, "War Stories: Inside Campaign 2016," also included Trump's campaign manager Kellyanne Conway and was the first time that the two managers appeared together alone since the presidential campaign.

On a special assignment from the Clinton campaign, Diane Hessan studied how undecided voters were responding to the campaign.

She wrote an op-ed in the Boston Globe sharing reflections from her study, which showed the reaction to the "deplorables" was stronger than when FBI Director James Comey sent a letter to Congress saying they were probing to see if additional emails on the laptop of one her top aides could have an impact on a closed investigation to Clinton's use of a primary email server.


The deplorable comment didn't just hurt Mrs. Clinton's chances, it gave Trump supporters something to rally around.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mook: Clinton's 'deplorables' comment 'definitely could have alienated' voters (Original Post) portlander23 Dec 2016 OP
It was a strategy she used in the primaries. Going after supporters... TCJ70 Dec 2016 #1
It was very careless of her BeyondGeography Dec 2016 #2
Better believe it!...nt SidDithers Dec 2016 #3
I guess grab them by the ***** wasn't so offensive. GEEZ nt asuhornets Dec 2016 #4
and "Mexicans are rapists" sure was a winner! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #5
yeah but those are not good white christians so it was deserved and cheered on JI7 Dec 2016 #20
Exactly! What comments should have hurt rainy Dec 2016 #9
As could about 80% of everything Trump said. n/t Orsino Dec 2016 #6
Yes, it was a mistake BainsBane Dec 2016 #7
The people offended by deplorables were willing to let Trump slide on his disgusting comments. tammywammy Dec 2016 #8
You have no idea... Raster Dec 2016 #11
I understand they did those shirts BainsBane Dec 2016 #15
It Became A Badge Of Honor... Grassy Knoll Dec 2016 #10
I loved the deplorables comment, it was the truth. Hillary spoke a lot of truth and some did not go seaglass Dec 2016 #12
Of course it did... lame54 Dec 2016 #13
add Mook to the enemies list - lol nt NRQ891 Dec 2016 #14
How rightwing of you. nt Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2016 #19
and, how's that NRQ891 Dec 2016 #22
"enemies list" re: Clinton is a right wing smear. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2016 #23
God forbid she accurately describes Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2016 #16
Thank you. narnian60 Dec 2016 #18
just shows the different standards. these useless fucks thought attacks on others by trump was just JI7 Dec 2016 #17
deplorable was too soft a term to describe those bigot thugs JI7 Dec 2016 #21

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
1. It was a strategy she used in the primaries. Going after supporters...
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 08:40 AM
Dec 2016

...the difference being she did it herself in the general but had surrogates do it during the primary. It's almost like that's a bad idea or something.

BeyondGeography

(40,014 posts)
2. It was very careless of her
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 08:40 AM
Dec 2016

Obama made a similar gaffe in 2008 (clinging to God and guns) but it didn't hurt him much. At the end of the day, many people who might have taken offense saw an upside in going with someone new and promising and were willing to give him a pass whereas with Hillary the same type of voter had already had a negative view of her candidacy and it hurt her. She needed to walk a finer line.

rainy

(6,208 posts)
9. Exactly! What comments should have hurt
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 09:06 AM
Dec 2016

Trump? ."I could walk out in the street and shoot someone and my followers would still vote fore me?" There are so many. Notice how the right can lie and slander to infinity and never be called on it by the press but let Hillary or a left leader say anything without it being scrutinized to infinity.

BainsBane

(54,780 posts)
7. Yes, it was a mistake
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 08:51 AM
Dec 2016

but given that those voters admired Trump's rude remarks, it's hard to believe it had much if any of an impact.

Raster

(20,999 posts)
11. You have no idea...
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 09:25 AM
Dec 2016

...friends of ours here in Arizona, he is a Exec Sales guy and travels Arizona and Mexico. He supported tRump because he believes "he will shake things up in Washington." A day or two after the deplorables comment, he already was having t-shirts printed and was having business cards printed with "deplorables" language. He pointed to the comment as "evidence" of just how out-of-touch Clinton was. Mind you, this is an intelligent guy, probably makes at least 100K a year. He voted for Bill Clinton TWICE.

Just days after the deporables comment, I was in Walmart, turned the corner and saw matching deplorables shirts on husband and wife.

Deplorables became: (1) a rallying cry; (2) signage- t-shirts, coffee mugs, etc. and (3) "verification" as to Clinton out-of-touch.

And speaking of my friend, he and his wife thought tRump's comments about women were "foul and ill-advised," but not a game changer for them.

When you are already thoroughly indoctrinated with Hillary Hate, her opponent could do no wrong, and she can do no good. And no, it does NOT make sense.

BainsBane

(54,780 posts)
15. I understand they did those shirts
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 09:38 AM
Dec 2016

Like lots of women worse nasty women t-shirts. But they were already Trump supporters, weren't they?

seaglass

(8,179 posts)
12. I loved the deplorables comment, it was the truth. Hillary spoke a lot of truth and some did not go
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 09:31 AM
Dec 2016

over well.

lame54

(36,892 posts)
13. Of course it did...
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 09:35 AM
Dec 2016

I cringed the second i heard it

They wore it like a badge of honor as many on our side embraced " Nasty Woman"

It's not the reason he won but it didn't help

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
16. God forbid she accurately describes
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 09:38 AM
Dec 2016

the rabid supporters of a racist, misogynist, lying piece of shit like Trump.

JI7

(90,527 posts)
17. just shows the different standards. these useless fucks thought attacks on others by trump was just
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 09:46 AM
Dec 2016

great. And the fucked up media did not bring it up when they played victim .

So they got to act like she was the hateful one while trumps disgustung ass attacked others and they cheered it on.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Mook: Clinton's 'deplorab...