Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 01:16 PM Dec 2016

Van Jones Knows What We Have to Do Next

In an exclusive interview with Van Jones before tonight’s CNN special, The Messy Truth, Mark Anthony Green speaks with the man who comforted liberal America on election night about everything: why it all went wrong, the difference between bigots and Trump voters, and where we go from here.

http://www.gq.com/story/van-jones-knows-the-messy-truth

snip....

You know, it's a very small number of people who are part of the alt-right. People act like 50 million people just signed up to be part of the neo-Nazi movement. That's not true! You have a group willing to tolerate the participation of people like that, and that's scary. But it's wrong to convince yourself that people who are willing to put up with it are themselves bigots. And that's where the left is going wrong. The left is making it a binary choice: You're either with the bigots or you're with the progressives. You're a racist or an anti-racist. You're either a sexist or an anti-sexist. And based on that binary, we now have convinced ourselves that half the country is raving-lunatic white supremacists. That's not true! It's more of a range.

snip...

But, Van, if you would vote for one who is going to put in power white nationalists, how are you not guilty of allowing it? I think you're letting them off the hook a little easy.
Well, here's the deal. This is why people are inordinately depressed. That analysis you just gave—if you voted for a bigot, you are a bigot, or not much better than a bigot—that analysis has done much more harm to progressives than it's done to Republicans.

But is it untrue?
Yeah, it's untrue. Because for most people who are not liberals, it's a range. It's not a binary choice. You have a minority of people on the right who are excited by racists, and those people I would call bigots. You have a much larger number of Trump supporters who find a lot of that stuff distasteful, but it's not disqualifying to them. They don't like those comments. They think they are inartful and bad. But to them, as hateful as those comments are, they're not disqualifying given their own economic needs and concerns. And liberals refusing to see a difference seem to think half the country is in a position it's not in. We're not in touch with reality. Look, it makes me sad that somebody says, "I don't hate you. I just don't like you enough to vote differently." But that's different than someone saying, "Actually, I do hate you."

I agree that it's different. But one is the worst thing, and the other thing is just really bad. You know?
Fine, but still...you have to deal with the country you live in. If you write off all the Trump voters and say all of them are part of the white-nationalist movement, and if Trump goes and starts attacking these dreamers, who will be standing with you to protect the dreamers? There are veterans who voted for Trump who, if Trump tries to take civil liberties away from American Muslims, will be marching with you in their uniforms, saying, "That's not America." We need to wake up to the fact that, as disappointed as we are in some of the Trump voters, we shouldn't be disgusted with the vast majority of them. There's a small percentage of them that are horrible. It's sad that the rest of Trump supporters are willing to put up with them, but that doesn't make [all Trump voters] irredeemable.
snip..

But Uncle Joe, though! Would Uncle Joe Biden have pulled it out?
Biden would have been more competitive. But let me just tell you this, and I know it's gonna make you sad about your country: I've never seen a celebrity lose. Reagan, Schwarzenegger, Jessie Ventura, weak-ass Sonny Bono! Any celebrity that I've seen as a Republican or an Independent has always won! Biden would have been more competitive, but I think we have to start realizing: You know what? Celebrities are gonna win stuff. I mean, Clay Aiken didn't win his race, but I don't think Clay Aiken really counts on the same level yet. Most of the time, celebrities win.



I said from Day One that Trump could win, because of his celebrity. I got laughed at, a lot. I agree with Van that it was a big factor.

Much more at the link. Van made me wish I had CNN, so I could watch his special The Messy Truth.

Van Jones is the most thoughtful voice I've heard in the post election evaluations. I wish he'd run for DNC Chair, he would be my first choice.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. star power is often sneered at and discounted. But every Democratic President since 1960
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 02:58 PM
Dec 2016

but Jimmy Carter has depended upon it for election.

2008 & 2012--Obama--star power

1992 and 1996: Bill Clintonb--star power

1976: Jimmy Carter--Watergate fallout

1964--JFK's running mate is incumbment--see 1960

1960--JFK--star power

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
5. The older white man he interviewed said, "We are who made the world go round."
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 05:04 PM
Dec 2016

Screw him. Entitled white men, all pissy that their easy lives have moved away. Get some retraining, dudes, get out of that Laz-y-boy chair and be flexible. They never had to - being a white male was all they had to do to succeed.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
6. That is what pisses me off about them.
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 11:07 PM
Dec 2016

They had far more sympathy from me 35 years ago, when Reagan declared war on working people, but these guys keep screwing up election after election. They don't even realize just how privileged they are. Usually there is some wife there who is also bringing in an income so they could take fancy trips and so forth, things that would take me YEARS as a single woman to get the funds. They still don't get it who declared war on their way of life and why.

I don't think they will ever get it.

 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
7. He has been my first choice for DNC chairperson for months.
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 11:46 PM
Dec 2016

He is brilliant, charismatic as hell, and a superb organiser.

BREMPRO

(2,331 posts)
8. I agree he would be a brilliant DNC chair
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 10:18 PM
Dec 2016

And a force that could help unite us in common purpose,, focus values and messaging that is appealing and inclusive, draw in swing independents, recruit new and invigorate old Democrats to win elections again! He's seen first hand the gradual decay and fracture of the party, witnessed the Trump phenomenon from the front lines. He is deeply knowledgeable and passionate about the issues the country faces and upholding Democratic values.. i'm convinced he's the best one we have for the job.

How do we get him to consider running? Any way to contact him or nominate him by petition?!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Van Jones Knows What We H...