So it's time to go higher.

They said that whether to recount was a state law/court issue, but that when to start it was within the circuit court's discretion

In my county I think she gained 48 more votes. The biggees will be Milw and the WOW counties. 3 Strong R counties where they have cheated before.

regardless of what happens in those counties. With Michigan's recount thwarted, there is no way Hillary can get to 270 electoral votes.

Www.palmerreport.com

There's nothing there.

With the deadline looming, I don't see a court scheduling a hearing three days later unless the court didn't expect it to go anywhere.

For a recount it should be based on percentages and not one vote difference. It is a whole lot easier to have accurate records for 500 voters than 10,000 voters for example. They should allow one vote off for 500 for example, and 20 for the 10,000.

Also the number of voters per voting machines should be equal. Combine precincts if necessary and make someone travel. All funding should be done by the state, and funds should be equal per voter.

We needed to overturn the results in ALL THREE STATES to change the outcome of the election. If Michigan is over, there is no way for Hillary to win.

One state would be enough if we could show clear signs that the election was stolen. That might open other states up to scrutiny (perhaps legal/criminal processes rather than standard recounts).

However - if the election was stolen, then WI had to be part of it, and the recount there is almost complete (and looks clean)

And that the exit polls showed she was winning. But, I don't know if the exit polls would account for all the tiny little towns where people were coming out of the woodwork to vote for Trump. I have lived in small towns my whole life, and have never seen an exit poller, ever.

Wrong