Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJudge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack"
Judges order effectively suspends Michigans recount
Robert Snell and Chad Livengood, The Detroit News 1:28 p.m. EST December 8, 2016
Detroit A federal judge issued an order Wednesday that effectively suspended a recount of the Nov. 8 presidential election that started three days ago and has yet to reveal fraud or significantly alter the results.
The manual statewide recount cost as much as $3 million but stopped after U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith lifted a temporary restraining order preventing state officials from stopping a recount prompted by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein. A state election board meeting scheduled for Thursday meeting was canceled.
Stein failed to show she was an aggrieved candidate as defined by state law and entitled to a recount, the judge said. He concluded Steins request to test the election systems vulnerability to fraud lacked evidence.
The vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack on the integrity of our election system, Goldsmith wrote.
Robert Snell and Chad Livengood, The Detroit News 1:28 p.m. EST December 8, 2016
Detroit A federal judge issued an order Wednesday that effectively suspended a recount of the Nov. 8 presidential election that started three days ago and has yet to reveal fraud or significantly alter the results.
The manual statewide recount cost as much as $3 million but stopped after U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith lifted a temporary restraining order preventing state officials from stopping a recount prompted by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein. A state election board meeting scheduled for Thursday meeting was canceled.
Stein failed to show she was an aggrieved candidate as defined by state law and entitled to a recount, the judge said. He concluded Steins request to test the election systems vulnerability to fraud lacked evidence.
The vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack on the integrity of our election system, Goldsmith wrote.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1525 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack" (Original Post)
Coyotl
Dec 2016
OP
renate
(13,776 posts)2. so, what if Hillary requested the recount?--she would be an aggrieved candidate
This would seem to be a pretty easy fix--I wonder why it hasn't been done.
triron
(22,240 posts)3. You and me both.
FBaggins
(27,704 posts)4. She would be fine...
... IF she has done so a couple weeks ago.