2016 Postmortem

TheBlackAdder

(28,916 posts) Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:08 AM Dec 2016

FOX NEWS Poll: Should the U.S. investigate allegations of Russian interference in the election?

.

What a bunch of KGB/GRU-loving Putinesques over there.

Should the U.S. investigate allegations of Russian interference in the election?

30% - Yes, that's a serious threat

61% - No, there's not enough evidence

08% - Not sure

Man, the party that wants to investigate this or that, lock people up for voting twice, really love their Putin!

One minute, vote integrity, voter fraud, vote stealing is a big issue... now, not so much!

How do you gain evidence, if you don't want to investigate accusations?

Note: it's on the FOX News (News... that's a joke) website, and I'm not linking to those anti-American frauds!

.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FOX NEWS Poll: Should the U.S. investigate allegations of Russian interference in the election? (Original Post) TheBlackAdder Dec 2016 OP

"No, there is not enough evidence" is not a real choice randr Dec 2016 #1

link to poll: annabanana Dec 2016 #2

Did they have enough evidence when the charged Hillary for Bengazi and Auntie Bush Dec 2016 #3

They've confused "investigation" with "witch hunt" Jean-Jacques Roussea Dec 2016 #4

They only care about stolen elections if they think their candidate might lose. Arkansas Granny Dec 2016 #5

Then you see if there MFM008 Dec 2016 #6

Yup. 2naSalit Dec 2016 #7

Frankly, I'm surprised they even covered the story at all... Farmgirl1961 Dec 2016 #8

Investigating is how you GET evidence underpants Dec 2016 #9

randr

(12,480 posts)

1. "No, there is not enough evidence" is not a real choice

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:11 AM

Dec 2016

An investigation is a search for evidence. These people are stupid beyond belief.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)

2. link to poll:

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:15 AM

Dec 2016

http://nation.foxnews.com/poll/2016/12/09/should-us-investigate-allegations-russian-interference-in-election/

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)

3. Did they have enough evidence when the charged Hillary for Bengazi and

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:17 AM

Dec 2016

The mirid other things they charged her for? Nooooooooooo!

Jean-Jacques Roussea

(475 posts)

4. They've confused "investigation" with "witch hunt"

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:23 AM

Dec 2016

investigations are not mob executions. Understandable given that they're only familiar with the inquisition-lite types of "investigating" that they put Hillary through for the last year.

Arkansas Granny

(31,827 posts)

5. They only care about stolen elections if they think their candidate might lose.

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:30 AM

Dec 2016

It's win at any cost, for them. If the shoe was on the other foot, they'd be howling like a pack of rabid wolves and demanding a full investigation and, possibly, a new election.

MFM008

(20,000 posts)

6. Then you see if there

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:36 AM

Dec 2016

Is enough evidence you stupid shit stains. If this was Clinton they would nullify entire election.

2naSalit

(92,695 posts)

7. Yup.

Reply to MFM008 (Reply #6)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:54 AM

Dec 2016

Farmgirl1961

(1,643 posts)

8. Frankly, I'm surprised they even covered the story at all...

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:57 AM

Dec 2016

But...really? Don't all of these a*holes realize that we're going to be Russia's tool? Forget American democracy, forget freedoms. This is incredibly dangerous territory we're headed into..

underpants

(186,646 posts)

9. Investigating is how you GET evidence

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:34 AM

Dec 2016

Jeebus

Reply to this discussion