Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 01:03 PM Dec 2016

Cenk Uygur can kiss my ass

Last edited Thu Dec 29, 2016, 11:52 AM - Edit history (2)

he was a chief Hillary hater



He has the nerve to complain? He helped put the mutha fucker there, by his constant complaining about Hillary.
120 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cenk Uygur can kiss my ass (Original Post) rbrnmw Dec 2016 OP
Plus he needs to change the name of his channel to "All the Middle-Aged Turks" lapucelle Dec 2016 #1
Actually he has young Ana Kasparian as his co-host womanofthehills Dec 2016 #14
Yes, she's fantastic. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #76
Let's not talk about the fact that forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #20
Cenk you've lost your priviledge of complaint now sit back Ohioblue22 Dec 2016 #2
Gosh that's a really shallow stab at reality ain't it! lastone Dec 2016 #44
You may have warned us treestar Dec 2016 #54
uh-oh, no fair asking such discomforting questions! such a meanie! Bill USA Dec 2016 #57
Uh-oh...helping Trump win makes way worse than a meanie. Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #69
And that was exactly the problem... not Bernie or his supporters. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #78
I do believe Bernie's run and failure to get out when it was clear he could not win, his refusal to Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #92
Yeahh, that "democracy" thing... always gettin in the way of tellin voters who to elect!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #93
+1! tecelote Jan 2017 #104
No it didn't...the attacks on Hillary and the party hurt us badly...we lost. Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #119
You have to admit Bernie's presence in the race moved Hillary farther to the left... that's a given. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #120
If Sanders or O'Malley had been the nominee I guarantee you that we would have learned all about StevieM Dec 2016 #62
Yes, blame it all on Bernie... like Hillary is blameless. GMAB!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #77
she is blameless . it's bad enough the right went after her Ohioblue22 Jan 2017 #85
I stopped paying attention to the TYT a while back Gothmog Dec 2016 #3
I was playing a Bill Maher video on youtube rbrnmw Dec 2016 #4
I stopped watching Maher a while back also Gothmog Dec 2016 #11
He advocated for Hillary in the GE Nonhlanhla Dec 2016 #5
If by "advocate" you mean ... dawg Dec 2016 #17
He was not super enthusiastic, to be sure, Nonhlanhla Dec 2016 #21
Well I voted for Bernie in the primaries. dawg Dec 2016 #22
I feel the same way. Third Doctor Dec 2016 #24
Agree with your post. LenaBaby61 Dec 2016 #34
Vicious, not viscous. You have to keep tabs on your hyperactive autocorrect . nt tblue37 Dec 2016 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author LenaBaby61 Dec 2016 #35
The horror of it all!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #79
is he still on the PUtin tv propaganda network? msongs Dec 2016 #6
That would be Thom Hartmann, Larry King, Ed Schultz, Mike Papantonio, etc. progressoid Dec 2016 #8
Nothing wrong with criticizing anyone .... LenaBaby61 Dec 2016 #7
I love Jimmy Dore! Awesome guy. PotatoChip Dec 2016 #19
I agree... check077 Dec 2016 #71
Had Hillary HEEDED the criticism, instead of coasting to the end, we'd gratefully be rid of Fuhrer-Elect Cheeto Face and be callin her Madame President. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #80
CENK jodymarie aimee Dec 2016 #9
Agreed - Cenk and Ana are doing a great job covering Standing Rock womanofthehills Dec 2016 #15
And Bernie leading the charge... gotta love his tenacity!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #81
Agreed. We need a lot more of them. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #26
I'm in agreement. I think we need more like him JDC Dec 2016 #48
I agree with you! I love TYT jzodda Dec 2016 #55
Yes, one of the lone wolves crying out in the wilderness. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #82
people are unforgiving when you don't stand at attention behind their Candidate. They would rather JCanete Dec 2016 #66
If only they had heeded his warnings. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #83
Cenk, Moore, Maher, etc... can be complete assholes at times, but... killbotfactory Dec 2016 #68
glad there are other supporters Locrian Jan 2017 #89
spot on Locrian jodymarie aimee Jan 2017 #94
This is the same guy who said Sanders won Super Tuesday and would be the nominee. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #10
He said Hillary's support was soft, and Trump could win a couple days before the election killbotfactory Dec 2016 #12
Soft? It looks like he was correct. padfun Dec 2016 #28
Bullshit. n/t Tarheel_Dem Dec 2016 #49
Agree! brutus smith Dec 2016 #51
The poster you responded to was being sarcastic. And we don't know how Sanders would have done. StevieM Dec 2016 #63
No doubt!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #84
Boy does he look foolish now. LenaBaby61 Dec 2016 #32
Why would you let him kiss your ass? He can go kiss La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #13
true rbrnmw Dec 2016 #16
I've got no time for TYT. They are part of the problem. dawg Dec 2016 #18
Yup they spent the whole campaign bashing her Thrill Dec 2016 #23
No they didn't. They held her to high standards, which shouldn't have been a problem. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #30
Oh yes they did? Where have you been? Al lyou have to do is search through their Thrill Dec 2016 #37
The polls were wrong. All of them. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #39
Michael Moore understood that once we turned our back on progressive populism, you could see the disaster comin from a mile away. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #86
I absolutely love Ana. She's one of the best journalists out there. jalan48 Dec 2016 #25
Sorry...there are no journalist anymore... Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #70
I like Cenk if for no other reason than he stood up to MSNBC when he worked for them. jalan48 Dec 2016 #73
I no longer watch any media including MSNBC... but Cenk did way Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #75
You obviously haven't been watching that closely. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #87
Cenk is an ass and I really do not care what he thinks Gothmog Dec 2016 #27
Did Cenk praise Trump for that Sprint deal he had nothing to do with? Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #29
It endures. Meanwhile, where's Hillary? TonyPDX Dec 2016 #31
I dunno Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #33
If we survive no one is going to laugh, and I'm hardly a millennial progressive. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #36
I wasn't pinning the blame solely on the BoBers Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #42
Hillary probably has the biggest name recognition of any "private citizen" on the planet. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #43
Why would I appear butthurt attacking Bernie Busters, Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #64
Sanders was not the candidate. In our other elections the losing candidate keeps a low profile . . . brush Jan 2017 #102
I'm less worried about what isn't a good look than saving the country. TonyPDX Jan 2017 #107
As a private citizen now without an office like Sanders and Warren she doesn't have much of . . . brush Jan 2017 #108
She doesn't have much of a platform? Only the biggest name recognition in the country. TonyPDX Jan 2017 #109
Re-read the last sentence. She knows it's time for new blood. brush Jan 2017 #110
It endures. Meanwhile, where's Hillary? LenaBaby61 Dec 2016 #40
The fight endures. Have you given up? TonyPDX Dec 2016 #41
The fight endures. Have you given up? LenaBaby61 Dec 2016 #45
I don't disagree with a single point you made. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #50
I am not a Bernie-basher and I don't think that most people who opposed him in the primaries StevieM Dec 2016 #65
Not at all. Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #46
Hope springs eternal. TonyPDX Dec 2016 #47
The TYT covered the standing rock water protectors when the MSM was either silent... killbotfactory Dec 2016 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author blue cat Dec 2016 #38
Because Cenk Uygur was correct ... earthside Dec 2016 #52
yeah had he only saved it all from that POS I wouldn't mind rbrnmw Dec 2016 #53
It is interesting to see the GOP toadies of M$M pretending Trump was not the M$M's favorite son, and Bill USA Dec 2016 #56
I'm not a huge TYT fan, but I like Cenk from time to time. welivetotreadonkings Dec 2016 #58
Yeah, fuck him bravenak Dec 2016 #60
Dissent is not tolerated in the modern OrwellwasRight Dec 2016 #67
Dissent is not the problem.... check077 Dec 2016 #72
Are we talking about Bernie now, or Trump? elehhhhna Jan 2017 #88
I disdain Trump, but.... check077 Jan 2017 #95
Truth is always important. I don't like it when my own party says to me "fall in line." JCanete Jan 2017 #100
Maybe because Sanders wouln't concede long after he had no chance. Weeks and weeks he kept . . . brush Jan 2017 #103
again who's fault is that. do you object to something that ended up being in Clinton's campaign or JCanete Jan 2017 #111
A novel way to look at it. They forced his hand to keep dividing the party brush Jan 2017 #112
I'm sorry, for my money, as a Democrat myself, he was a Dem. Shouldn't those of us in the party JCanete Jan 2017 #113
IMO he may as well have been running as a third party because he attacked the party continuously brush Jan 2017 #114
oh, you're all in the talking points zone I see. His platform certainly didn't neglect people of JCanete Jan 2017 #115
Blah de blah blah blah. If those people didn't listen to and vote according to trumps dog whistles.. brush Jan 2017 #116
I would say its about a two-party system being a fairly undemocratic condition that we find JCanete Jan 2017 #117
Cenk, what happened to you? betsuni Dec 2016 #74
From what friends who watch Cenk tell me .... LenaBaby61 Jan 2017 #90
Ugh. cwydro Jan 2017 #91
He was a Trump surrogate. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #96
No he wasn't. Your power to conflate justified criticism, even distrust of our whole system, to JCanete Jan 2017 #99
Denial is strong around here Devil Child Jan 2017 #97
It's an odd time we live in TSIAS Jan 2017 #98
The left now consider Glenn Beck our friend. LenaBaby61 Jan 2017 #105
Lost and stranded B C Butler Jan 2017 #101
I never bothered with Chunk Uighur or TYT. I'm a much happier Dem. nt LLStarks Jan 2017 #106
Fuck him. BigDemVoter Jan 2017 #118
 

forjusticethunders

(1,151 posts)
20. Let's not talk about the fact that
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 12:52 PM
Dec 2016

He's a genocide denier, and takes the name of his show from a group of genocidal fascist thugs.

Cenk can burn in hell, and he probably will.

 

Ohioblue22

(1,430 posts)
2. Cenk you've lost your priviledge of complaint now sit back
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 01:50 PM
Dec 2016

And enjoy the ride that you , Bernie and his supporters help create.

 

lastone

(588 posts)
44. Gosh that's a really shallow stab at reality ain't it!
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:03 PM
Dec 2016

Lol - blame Sanders all you want and never and I mean never for a second take into account what so many of us warned you about Hillary and her manufactured credibility problem. Keep blaming Sanders, must be getting some sand in your ears with your head so far buried..

Demsrule86

(71,033 posts)
69. Uh-oh...helping Trump win makes way worse than a meanie.
Sat Dec 31, 2016, 07:44 AM
Dec 2016

Hillary was the only thing that stood between us and Trump...and he just didn't get it...many of them didn't...well I will never forgive him nor watch his show.

Demsrule86

(71,033 posts)
92. I do believe Bernie's run and failure to get out when it was clear he could not win, his refusal to
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 08:06 PM
Jan 2017

concede and encouraging protests at the convention costs us the election. It certainly contributed to it...given the millions more votes she got...I believe she would have won had Bernie never run.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,641 posts)
93. Yeahh, that "democracy" thing... always gettin in the way of tellin voters who to elect!!
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 08:13 PM
Jan 2017

The truth is, Bernie's presence in the primary race made Hillary a BETTER progressive candidate on the issues that matter most to the 99% of folks... she prolly would've lost by an even BIGGER margin had it not been for Bernie's influence! That's a fact!

Demsrule86

(71,033 posts)
119. No it didn't...the attacks on Hillary and the party hurt us badly...we lost.
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 09:27 AM
Jan 2017

Had Bernie never run, we would have won. I would never want a non-Democrat to run in our primary again.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,641 posts)
120. You have to admit Bernie's presence in the race moved Hillary farther to the left... that's a given.
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 11:35 AM
Jan 2017

Now, in MY opinion - wise as it is - that garnered her MORE votes in the general from the Democratic base than she otherwise would've received had she campaigned as a centrist candidate. IRONICALLY, had Hillary NATURALLY gravitated towards those progressive populist positions - instead of getting DRAGGED, kickin' and screamin' without a sincere belief in those positions - I'm not so sure Bernie would've felt compelled to run against her!! (He basically said as much.)

In any case, I believe Bernie did Hillary - AND the Democratic Party - a HUGE fuckin' favor by running against her in the primaries, as she would have gotten clobbered even worse in the Electoral College voting. So, instead of continually condemning Bernie, we should be singing his praises!!

You can disagree all you want, and throw in a few personal insults like many loyal Hillary followers are prone to do lately here on DU, but that doesn't change the reality of the situation.

StevieM

(10,546 posts)
62. If Sanders or O'Malley had been the nominee I guarantee you that we would have learned all about
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 09:54 PM
Dec 2016

what miserable human beings they are.

Just like we did about Al Gore and John Kerry.

 

Ohioblue22

(1,430 posts)
85. she is blameless . it's bad enough the right went after her
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 02:51 PM
Jan 2017

but from bernie it was inexcusable. he and the bobs gave us trump . he was an independent who became a dem just long enough to spoil the election for us .

dawg

(10,774 posts)
17. If by "advocate" you mean ...
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 12:25 PM
Dec 2016

continually trashing her in his videos, repeating right-wing smears against her, and then, at the very end, offhandedly admitting that he was going to vote for her because Trump was such a disaster - then yes, I guess he did.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
21. He was not super enthusiastic, to be sure,
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 12:55 PM
Dec 2016

but, although I do not always agree with him, many of his criticisms had merit (not all), he was very clear on why progressives should vote for Hillary, and he was right in predicting that the election would be close and Trump had a chance of winning. I was a Hillary supporter in the primaries and sometimes Cenk's whining about the primaries gets on my nerves, but at the same time I find him worth listening to.

dawg

(10,774 posts)
22. Well I voted for Bernie in the primaries.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 01:58 PM
Dec 2016

But I'm through with Cenk and TYT. A total waste of bandwidth as far as I'm concerned.

Third Doctor

(1,574 posts)
24. I feel the same way.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 02:43 PM
Dec 2016

Last edited Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:39 PM - Edit history (1)

When it was time to pull together to avert a disaster Cenk doubled down until he got scared late in the race. He also praised Trump (while trashing Obama) before his Carrier scam was fully reported.

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
34. Agree with your post.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:29 PM
Dec 2016

FULLY done with TYT.

When they're not busy trashing Hillary they do good work, however the last time I saw anything from them, I saw that they were still trashing her post the election, and acting like Bernie was perfect and a saint. I like Bernie very much and would have voted for him if he had been the Dem nominee. To believe that Bernie would have been spared an opposition research dump on him is ludicrous, and I hear that the woman-beating Nazi Bannon was ready to go full bore with the opposition research they had on Bernie if he was the Dem nominee, and from what I've read, that opposition research was going to be extremely salacious and viscous, and I don't doubt that one bit. It's bad enough that the media gave $2 Billion dollars worth of free air time to that lying, racist ruskie-loving criminal tRumputin, but knowing 95% of the corporate press/media, they would have covered the more salacious/viscous things out there that Bannon 'allegedly' had on Bernie, meanwhile, not cover his message at ALL.

Response to Third Doctor (Reply #24)

progressoid

(50,784 posts)
8. That would be Thom Hartmann, Larry King, Ed Schultz, Mike Papantonio, etc.
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 03:56 PM
Dec 2016

TYT broadcasts on:
Sirius Satellite Radio (2002–2009, 2009–2010)
Air America (2006–2008)
YouTube (2005–present)
Roku (2013–2016)
Hulu (2014–2016)
Current TV (2011–2013)

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
7. Nothing wrong with criticizing anyone ....
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 03:50 PM
Dec 2016

Even Hillary, when the criticism is warranted, and I'm an avid Hillary supporter.

However, he acts as if Bernie is perfect, and that's hardly the case. If you think Cenk is bad, you ought to hear his idiotic friend Jimmy Dore, who thinks Bernie is the Messiah. What an idiot that guy is.

Post 2017, I'm no longer listening to EITHER one of them, or to TYT.

check077

(16 posts)
71. I agree...
Sat Dec 31, 2016, 08:10 AM
Dec 2016

Jimmy Dore spews criticism of Democrats and Hillary to the extent that one would have to double-take to ensure one had not accidentally tuned in to right wing radio. I now avoid Dore and Cenk as much as possible.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,641 posts)
80. Had Hillary HEEDED the criticism, instead of coasting to the end, we'd gratefully be rid of Fuhrer-Elect Cheeto Face and be callin her Madame President.
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 02:40 PM
Jan 2017

Such a missed opportunity... such a shame.

 

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts)
9. CENK
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 04:06 PM
Dec 2016

is a hero to me. Outspoken genius. Ditto Moore, Maher, Ed. Pap, Hartmann....we need MORE of them not less to fight against RW hate radio.

womanofthehills

(9,316 posts)
15. Agreed - Cenk and Ana are doing a great job covering Standing Rock
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 10:34 PM
Dec 2016

People on this site hate anyone who ever was for Bernie. The hate for Tom Hartman on here is sad. I also love Pap - he is one of my favorites. He alone is basically fighting the fight against Monsanto.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,641 posts)
81. And Bernie leading the charge... gotta love his tenacity!!
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 02:46 PM
Jan 2017

Progressive populism is catching fire... Bernie's message is getting through!

Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
26. Agreed. We need a lot more of them.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:12 PM
Dec 2016

I'm starting to learn how to ignore people who believe otherwise. It's not really a problem.

jzodda

(2,124 posts)
55. I agree with you! I love TYT
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:57 PM
Dec 2016

Outside them and keith oberman on YouTube and Maddow on TV it feels like we have very little out there for those of us who are ready to fight.

Cenk didn't support HRC but imo made the right choice in the end.

His support for Bernie only enhances his stature in my view.

I will continue to watch and advocate that others also do so.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
66. people are unforgiving when you don't stand at attention behind their Candidate. They would rather
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 10:52 PM
Dec 2016


label something wholly evil or self-serving, than to appreciate it for the good it does, and that includes Snowden because he made Obama look bad, and Colonel West and Susan Sarandon...people we used to think of as good progressive voices on these boards.

I like Cenk too. I like Maher and Moore etc. yet at plenty of turns I have thought that each of them have gotten something entirely wrong...especially Maher on his "all religions suck but some suck more than others" campaign. So I take them for their strengths and disagree with them where they are wrong. All of them bring far more value than anybody on the big three major cable news channels which is a shame, because I've always liked Rachel, all the way back to her Air America days, I just don't think she's pushing any limits in her role, which, given the corporate entity that is MSNBC, is both unsurprising and a shame.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
68. Cenk, Moore, Maher, etc... can be complete assholes at times, but...
Fri Dec 30, 2016, 12:06 AM
Dec 2016

When I disagree with them, I don't believe it's because they're wrong because they are dishonest or corrupt.

Pretty much every smarmy right-wing talking head is bought off and completely full of shit.

Locrian

(4,523 posts)
89. glad there are other supporters
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 04:47 PM
Jan 2017

Really like TYT. They're one of the only strong progressive outlets.

Calling it as it is (re HRC) may butt hurt some peoples feelings (identity politics) but we need more of it if we are ever going to get back on a progressive track.

They just hired new reporters, run WOLF PAC, and I love Agressive Progressive - seems like they're doing more that posting about trumps outrageous tweets and how stupid his supporters are.

 

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts)
94. spot on Locrian
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 08:38 PM
Jan 2017

FreeSpeech TV was the only outlet blasting Greg Palast's crosscheck investigation. MSM could give a crap about real news. And right wing radio is hypnotizing the deplorables.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
10. This is the same guy who said Sanders won Super Tuesday and would be the nominee.
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 05:26 PM
Dec 2016

I don't know how anyone can take him very seriously.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
12. He said Hillary's support was soft, and Trump could win a couple days before the election
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 08:49 PM
Dec 2016

Boy does he look foolish now.

padfun

(1,857 posts)
28. Soft? It looks like he was correct.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:15 PM
Dec 2016

If Sanders was the nominee, Dems would control the Senate and the Presidency.

 

brutus smith

(685 posts)
51. Agree!
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:42 PM
Dec 2016

We need more like him. Hillary is yesterday's news. Time to move forward and get our shit together.

StevieM

(10,546 posts)
63. The poster you responded to was being sarcastic. And we don't know how Sanders would have done.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 09:59 PM
Dec 2016

We do know that Sanders and O'Malley would have been portrayed as miserable human beings had they been the nominee. There would have been made up scandals against them too.

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
32. Boy does he look foolish now.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:19 PM
Dec 2016

To believe that Bernie wouldn't have suffered the same problems of voter suppression/voter disenfranchisement as Hillary did is ridiculous. Like the GOP was going to play "nice" with him just because he was Bernie? Plus, cyber-hacking or interference by the ruskies didn't help her either. In fact, I don't think ANY Dem would have won the presidency, knowing/feeling what I know and feel nearing January 2017.

Also, Bernie was NEVER vetted by the press because they were too busy ignoring him in favor of giving tRumputin $2 Billion dollars worth of free air time, so I'm not buying ANY of this "Bernie blows tRumputin away" business. I would have voted for him if he had been the Dem nominee, as I trust him much more than that evil mad man tRumputin. However, the GOP nor the ruskies would have played "nice" with Bernie either.

dawg

(10,774 posts)
18. I've got no time for TYT. They are part of the problem.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 12:28 PM
Dec 2016

Cenk is one of those guys who thinks he's always the smartest guy in the room. But he's not. He's sloppy with his facts and blinded by the size of his own ego.

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
30. No they didn't. They held her to high standards, which shouldn't have been a problem.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:15 PM
Dec 2016

Same with Bernie. So many here seem to forget that he stood beside Hillary in TWELVE STATES during the last week of the election, alone. If you're butt-hurt because he pushed her platform left, then that's too bad.

Thrill

(19,309 posts)
37. Oh yes they did? Where have you been? Al lyou have to do is search through their
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:34 PM
Dec 2016

twitter account. They only retweeted the negative stories about her. Only polls that were bad for her. Cenk even said Trump won all the debates. And go look at the guy that works for them Jordan. You would think he was a trump supporter throughout the campaign

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
39. The polls were wrong. All of them.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:38 PM
Dec 2016

Michael Moore got it right. Do you despise him, too?

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,641 posts)
86. Michael Moore understood that once we turned our back on progressive populism, you could see the disaster comin from a mile away.
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 02:53 PM
Jan 2017

Demsrule86

(71,033 posts)
70. Sorry...there are no journalist anymore...
Sat Dec 31, 2016, 07:46 AM
Dec 2016

She is on Cent's show therefore, she can not be a journalist. She is all about opinion not facts...and those opinions helped elect Trump.

jalan48

(14,500 posts)
73. I like Cenk if for no other reason than he stood up to MSNBC when he worked for them.
Sat Dec 31, 2016, 08:34 AM
Dec 2016

Unlike Maddow, he refused to be bought off by big corporate money.

Demsrule86

(71,033 posts)
75. I no longer watch any media including MSNBC... but Cenk did way
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 02:14 PM
Jan 2017

more damage to our candidate than Maddow...Cent is dead to me...I will neve watch anything he is a part of.

 

Charles Bukowski

(1,132 posts)
29. Did Cenk praise Trump for that Sprint deal he had nothing to do with?
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:15 PM
Dec 2016

Like he did when the farcical Carrier deal went down? Cenk even trashed Obama while heaping praise on Trump.

The Young Turds are dead to me, and I'd be more than happen if someone returned the favor and spat in Jimmy Dore's phony progressive mug.

How's Bernie's liberal revolution working out for you now, kiddies?

 

Charles Bukowski

(1,132 posts)
33. I dunno
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:21 PM
Dec 2016

thinking about how hard she's going to laugh in few years at the millennial progressives who "voted with their conscience" or stayed home?

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
36. If we survive no one is going to laugh, and I'm hardly a millennial progressive.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:33 PM
Dec 2016

She came up about 80,000 votes short. Blame Bernie. Blame Cenk. Blame anyone you wish if it makes you feel better.

As a precinct committee person for the Democratic Party I supported Bernie in the primaries but worked my ass off for Hillary when she became the party's candidate. During canvassing I met so many women and men that expressed extreme distrust of Hillary and her husband but said they'd vote for her. I also met women and men who said they'd leave the ballot box for President unchecked (Oregon was not in play). I assume that many others throughout the country had similar opinions. Some were able to transfer their allegiance, others couldn't, but to blame the 80,000 votes she lacked specifically on ANY group or person is such a fool's endeavor.

A question, though. Why has she remained mostly silent in the weeks since the election? She wasn't elected President so now she'll disappear? Do leaders do that?

Meanwhile, Bernie returned to the fight.

 

Charles Bukowski

(1,132 posts)
42. I wasn't pinning the blame solely on the BoBers
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:58 PM
Dec 2016

But they along with Cenk & friends sure as hell didn't help.

Frankly, their behavior offended me even more than the Deplorables - - at least the Deplorables weren't running around acting as if they were the final word on progressive ideals.

We had Trump in our midst, yet third party candidates grabbed a larger share of the vote than elections past. That should not have happened, I don't care how lukewarm they felt towards Hillary. The millennial turnout was disgraceful.


The Young Turds were so vehemently anti-Hillary during the primaries (and even after she clinched the nomination, which of course they claimed she stole) it's no wonder that the bulk of their followers ended up hating her more than Trump. You should have seen the comments section on Facebook. Bernie Bros deflected blame from Trump onto Hillary with all the skill of a right-wing nut job. It was sad to witness.

As for your question, Hillary is a private citizen now, she doesn't have the platform Bernie, Warren, and Schumer do. Maybe she'll summon the will to fight on somewhere down the line, but watching former Blue states get a cases of the stupids and flip for Trump must have been very disheartening for her. Besides, after a grueling campaign, she's earned a break from the like of the Deplorables, Cenk, and Jimmy fucking Dore.

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
43. Hillary probably has the biggest name recognition of any "private citizen" on the planet.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:03 PM
Dec 2016

What is she doing with it? She's not leading, that's for sure.

And, hey, you can slam and slander anyone you wish, but it just makes you appear butt-hurt and bitter. Not exactly the qualities anyone needs to survive the shit-storm on the horizon.

 

Charles Bukowski

(1,132 posts)
64. Why would I appear butthurt attacking Bernie Busters,
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 10:05 PM
Dec 2016

unless they're gloating over Trump's victory? Knowing how warped their ideals are, they probably self-satisfied with Clinton's defeat. It wouldn't surprise me.

Bitter? You bet your ass I'm bitter. SS and Medicare are about to be gutted, my Latino employees (I own a small restaurant) are worried sick that their parents are going to be deported, I'm about to lose my health insurance. 8 years after the worst presidency of my lifetime came to an end, the GOP is more powerful than ever.

I'm gearing up for the fight to come, but this is a tough pill to swallow.

brush

(57,975 posts)
102. Sanders was not the candidate. In our other elections the losing candidate keeps a low profile . . .
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 04:14 AM
Jan 2017

out of respect for the office of the presidency — certainly not for trump.

Sore loserism is not a good look.

And after the Comey/Putin treachery, can you blame her for wanting to rest after two grueling years of hate thrown at her from the right and left?

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
107. I'm less worried about what isn't a good look than saving the country.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 07:55 AM
Jan 2017

Had she won she'd have eight years of difficult work ahead. Can I blame her for wanting to rest?

brush

(57,975 posts)
108. As a private citizen now without an office like Sanders and Warren she doesn't have much of . . .
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 08:50 AM
Jan 2017

a platform. I'm sure she's concerned about the country but with the repugs holding all the cards she's waiting in the short term to see what happens like all the rest of us.

She also probably realizes it's time for new, younger blood in the party to step up.

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
109. She doesn't have much of a platform? Only the biggest name recognition in the country.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 10:54 AM
Jan 2017

How could she have managed the rigors of the office if she's too exhausted now?

brush

(57,975 posts)
110. Re-read the last sentence. She knows it's time for new blood.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 11:06 AM
Jan 2017

And I suspect she's had enough of the attacks — not just from the repugs but from the left.

And what do you expect her to do? Name recognition you say? She just "lost" so that name recognition doesn't mean much. The repugs control everything now. You want her up on a soapbox still fighting the campaign? She's wise enough to know she doesn't have to help trump cut his own throat. He's perfectly capable of doing that himself.

Schumer, Pelosi and Warren and hopefully some younger Dems have to takeover leadership of the party now.

All the "no more identity politics" and "cater to the white working class trump voter" rhetoric (indirect, but still more attacks on the Clinton campaign) from you know who is just further dividing the Dems and not getting us anywhere.

Bernie needs to stand down with continuing the primary battle.

And what about his revolution/new organization? Why not work on that?

We'll all have a clearer picture as to how to proceed after Jan. 20th.



LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
40. It endures. Meanwhile, where's Hillary?
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 04:42 PM
Dec 2016

How is it going to endure when the Senate will probably be even more RED in 2018 due to voter suppression/voter disenfranchisement which when reported will NOT be dealt with by a tRumputin DOJ, and due to the fact that I have no earthly clue if Dems will even be able to trust the voting apparatus out their in terms of cyber-hacking--especially under a tRumputin DOJ favorable to russia/putin, and who won't care one bit about investigating voter suppression etc., especially if it's reported by Democrats or progressives.

Secondly, the Congress will be redistricting in 2020, and if the Congress gets any further right/red, then what in the world can progressives exactly do about it? Like they're going to be spared this tRumputin shit sandwich? Seriously, like a tRumputin DOJ will make it easier for progressives to vote? The Civil Rights voting act which will be torn to shreds these next 2 and beyond years under tRumputin/GOP leadership will be torn to shreds and dialed back for progressives ALSO. With a deep red Senate and Congress and possible rethug presidency for 8 years, how will a progressive message endure, especially if the voting apparatus (Voting machines) can be subject to tampering?

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
45. The fight endures. Have you given up?
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:05 PM
Dec 2016

NO, I haven't given up...

But let's face facts here.

When you have a mostly corporate media who doesn't care one bit about fact/truth but only about ratings and ad dollars then you're in trouble as a society/nation. We have NO counterbalance as it relates to truth in the media. They're currently very busy kissing tRumputin's excuse my French, ass.

When you have a head of a tRumputin DOJ who will of course further double down on getting rid of voting rights for Dems/progressives and make it more difficult for US to vote, and not bother ALEC who will continue thriving, I'd say that is PAST cause for concern. And, when you have all 3 branches of the government going dead red, right, and ruskie (Now the GOP is in love with russia) and who gives more deference to russia/putin than it's own citizenry, that spells TROUBLE in all capitals.

Also, if the Senate goes to 60 or more for the Rethugs in 2018 (Which is may thanks to DINO's like Joe Manchin of West Virginia), and if via redistricting the Congress goes even more in favor of the GOP, and on top of THAT a whole full 8 years of a GOP presidency, then for the next 10 years and MORE the Dems/progressives will be in the wilderness I didn't even mention what types of devastating rulings a tRumputin Supreme Court could make that will further cripple this country in years to come).

I don't trust the GOP as far as I could throw a pyramid, and IF it gets to the point where the Rethugs can start to dig into and change the Constitution because they have the numbers to .... Makes me sick to my stomach thinking about all of the power the GOP has.

Dems/progressive are in DEEP trouble, and that's even BEFORE 2018, and 2020 gets here.

TonyPDX

(962 posts)
50. I don't disagree with a single point you made.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:27 PM
Dec 2016

All the more reason to unite and resist TOGETHER than continue to cleave and blame and disintegrate our efforts further. Posts that continue to attack people who supported Bernie or anyone who didn't sport a Hillary tattoo are just divisive. I left the dkos community because they refused to talk about Democrats living in poverty, or the simple fact that 2/3's of American's couldn't put $1,000 together if hit by an emergency. Markos' community shifted to center-left and less-affluent Democrats became almost unmentionable.

Now, a significant number in this community with "Underground" in it's name can't tolerate less-than-messianic reverence for a candidate who seems to have gone underground in defeat. I believe we've got to be for all Democrats-- the poor folks who showed up for Bernie AND the Greg Dworkins. Pissing on Cenk Uygur or Bernie or Michael Moore or Bill Maher doesn't move us forward one inch, and further inflames causes for division.

Hillary supporters wondered why Bernie supporters couldn't put aside their differences and just fall into line after the primaries since fighting Trump was the main objective. I ask the same people why they can't join with fellow Democrats to resist the orange monster?

StevieM

(10,546 posts)
65. I am not a Bernie-basher and I don't think that most people who opposed him in the primaries
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 10:16 PM
Dec 2016

want him banished from the party.

I do hear a lot of Bernie supporters trashing HRC and her supporters and essentially demanding that we seek forgiveness and redemption.

I think it is natural for Hillary to take some time off after this bruising election. She just suffered the most hateful campaign of personal destruction in American history.

 

Charles Bukowski

(1,132 posts)
46. Not at all.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:06 PM
Dec 2016

I'm just venting right now. I don't think the Clintons have given up either.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
61. The TYT covered the standing rock water protectors when the MSM was either silent...
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 09:50 PM
Dec 2016

or pretending that the protesters were being violent. The only media on the ground at the protests were independent like TYT.

The MSM was too busy reporting every dumbass Trump tweet, I guess.

Response to rbrnmw (Original post)

earthside

(6,960 posts)
52. Because Cenk Uygur was correct ...
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:44 PM
Dec 2016

... he has every right to critique Trump.

And that's a fact.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
53. yeah had he only saved it all from that POS I wouldn't mind
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 05:51 PM
Dec 2016

Last edited Sat Dec 31, 2016, 09:05 AM - Edit history (1)

he was part of the problem being one of those I'll hold my nose people, I lost all respect for him.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
56. It is interesting to see the GOP toadies of M$M pretending Trump was not the M$M's favorite son, and
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 06:28 PM
Dec 2016

acting like they are surprised that Trump has no conception of public service, (like all Republicans) sees nothing wrong with corruption - if they are engaging in it, and has no comprehension of what 'democracy' means. Their idea of government is fascism, where Government is run by and for the business community (i.e. the owners of business, the wealthy).



58. I'm not a huge TYT fan, but I like Cenk from time to time.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 06:47 PM
Dec 2016

He defended Hillary on the e-mail story right away when it broke. Sure, he had criticisms of her, but I think there was a good portion that were legitimate--and I say this as someone who happily voted for Clinton and was enthusiastic about our platform. Cenk defended voting for her, and he is in one of the bluest states. Really, it's Jimmy Dore that should deserve our scorn. That dude has been arguing that Trump was the preferred candidate, because now it will unite the left around resisting him or some nonsense. Completely disregards that his life as a straight, white man making a decent living won't be affected much by the incoming administration, aside from tax breaks perhaps.

OrwellwasRight

(5,214 posts)
67. Dissent is not tolerated in the modern
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 11:03 PM
Dec 2016

Democratic Party, eh? Not allowed to criticize a candidate, eh? That really builds faith that this is a Party that will defend different points of view and freedom of expression.

check077

(16 posts)
72. Dissent is not the problem....
Sat Dec 31, 2016, 08:28 AM
Dec 2016

One should know when and where to do it. It definitely not while one is facing a thug who is attempting to mutilate and rob one in a back alley.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
88. Are we talking about Bernie now, or Trump?
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 03:25 PM
Jan 2017

Because the way you all talk sometimes I can't really tell the difference

check077

(16 posts)
95. I disdain Trump, but....
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 04:36 PM
Jan 2017

some things that Bernie did ultimately hurt the party's chances in the general election. I don't dislike the guy and agree with using much of what he believed to help reshape the Democratic party. I saw so much potential where Hillary holding the presidency while Bernie having her by the short hairs to carry out a progressive agenda.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
100. Truth is always important. I don't like it when my own party says to me "fall in line."
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 03:12 AM
Jan 2017

If we didn't have disaffected democrats and liberals that had a voice, the DNC and Clinton would never have tacked left post-primaries to try to court us. If our establishment wanted us to " fall in line," then why in God's name did it take them so long to actually role out a promising platform?" Instead she and they fought some of Sanders policies head-on as unicorns and fairy dust, only to adopt some of them anyway.

brush

(57,975 posts)
103. Maybe because Sanders wouln't concede long after he had no chance. Weeks and weeks he kept . . .
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 04:26 AM
Jan 2017

up the attacks on "the establishment/Clinton" when the primary was lost to him.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
111. again who's fault is that. do you object to something that ended up being in Clinton's campaign or
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:51 PM
Jan 2017

on the DNC platform? If yes, then why? If no, then why didn't the Democratic leadership adopt these ideas sooner? Sanders didn't get into the race to win. He got further than he ever expected to get. The Democratic leadership was simply annoyed that he was there in the first place, and when they thought they could just stick a fork in him everybody would just fall in line, they fully intended to bury his issues with him. From April til July they weren't trying to court Sanders voters, they were trying to make us all into Bernie Bros, and Sanders into a selfish and delusional candidate.

So, because of our leadership's choices, had Sanders not taken it to the convention, his entire run would have been nearly for naught. They forced his hand, in my opinion.

brush

(57,975 posts)
112. A novel way to look at it. They forced his hand to keep dividing the party
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:07 PM
Jan 2017

He's the one who asked to run as a Dem then didn't want to stop attacking the party long after he couldn't win.

Never again should a non-Dem with no party allegiance be allowed to run and take advantage of the Democratic Party brand and recognition, only to good back to being an independent after having used the party for name recognition and money raising ability (he even admitted to that).

Never again.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
113. I'm sorry, for my money, as a Democrat myself, he was a Dem. Shouldn't those of us in the party
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:20 PM
Jan 2017

have a say in who we accept as our own?

The other option would have been 3rd party candidacy. Why don't you tell me how you feel about that?

Besides, I care far more about issues than D's behind people's names. Are we a party of ideals or of something else entirely?


But you didn't bother to actually address my points. Why didn't the leadership listen earlier? You are fully welcome to say you don't like the things that Sanders got into the platform, but then I'd ask you why on earth not? And if you do, again, why the hold out? What could possibly justify doing damage to ourselves as a party by resisting the integration of ideas into our platform that actually make it better?

brush

(57,975 posts)
114. IMO he may as well have been running as a third party because he attacked the party continuously
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:29 PM
Jan 2017

He's still doing with the "stop playing identity politics" and appealing to the "white working class" rhetoric.

Identity politics, meaning people of color of course, the voters he neglected during the southern primaries as not being that important.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
115. oh, you're all in the talking points zone I see. His platform certainly didn't neglect people of
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:38 PM
Jan 2017

color.In fact quite the opposite. His policies would have been far more beneficial to underserved communities than Clinton's. Also, his position and record on civil-rights issues has always been ahead of the times, not behind them. Just in the context of this race, he was the first of the candidates to support Black Lives Matter. That is hardly pandering to a white working class.

We do need to appeal to people who don't hear us now, and one way to do that is to not shame or vilify them for their vote. We don't need to make them feel like bad people, because if we try to do that we lose them anyway. We need to get them to hear us about what they are voting for versus what they actually want...about what they think ails them versus what actually does.

brush

(57,975 posts)
116. Blah de blah blah blah. If those people didn't listen to and vote according to trumps dog whistles..
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 06:41 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Tue Jan 3, 2017, 08:14 PM - Edit history (3)

we could reach them, but they don't. They respond to make America white . . . er, ah . . . great again talking points as they're afraid of losing their white privilege. To them, talk of evening the playing field for POCs seems like oppression to them. They want the 50s all over again where they didn't have to have even a high school diploma to get a good job, and of course where the black people knew their place.

Not a surprise, I mean with a black president for 8 years continuously attacked and opposed by the repugs, it was easy to vilify him and turn the race into a referendum to get a white guy, not a white woman, back into the white house.

Repugs are dirty. They know how to reach low info voters — gutter politics, they use race first, make them feel entitled to think they're special and better than "those people".

And talk about "talking points zones" you're wallowing in Sanders' campaign talking points zone with the WWC appeals. It didn't work for him because most WWC were more interested in getting rid of the black guy and keeping women down than whether some socialist is talking about free health care that's going to double their taxes.

As a matter of fact it backfired as he alienated a huge part of the base of the party by neglecting outreach to them in the early primaries. . . African Americans, Latino Americans, Asian Americans and other POCs.

And then after using the party's brand for name recognition and fund raising, he runs back to being an independent but still wants to control the Dem party agenda. Stay a Democrat for God's sake for credibility and a show of gratitude for now being more than a little-known independent from a small state with no influence.

Being a Democrat was good enough when running for president but not now? WTF is that about?

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
117. I would say its about a two-party system being a fairly undemocratic condition that we find
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 09:32 PM
Jan 2017

ourselves in. Sanders was most closely aligned with Democratic Party Principles, and he ran within a structure that already had supporters of him. That makes perfect sense to me. The other added benefit is that he didn't run in opposition to Clinton and Trump in a 3-way GE race that would surely have put Trump into the White House, or at least, likely would have.

As to racism...the point is that it isn't an intrinsic nature-over-nurture condition. Focusing on racists rather than the machinery that makes them so, is not going to put an end to this vicious cycle. Giving them an alternative narrative that they are responsive to will. People do change. We're capable of helping them to do it, but changing people's paradigm is a delicate matter.

That absolutely doesn't mean that we subsume issues important to minorities and marginalized communities in order to not seem threatening to these voter blocs. I don't think Sanders did that or is doing that now, whether he made missteps in connecting with these communities early in the campaign or not.What he is dong is finding a message that will resonate with people that actually allows us to tear down their racist assumptions, by showing what is actually making their lives harder...by showing that we don't have to even the playing field on their backs, but that evening it will actually make all lives better if we do it by taking back the commons.

betsuni

(27,285 posts)
74. Cenk, what happened to you?
Sat Dec 31, 2016, 08:39 AM
Dec 2016

You used to have common sense and knew right from wrong, then you turned into a sputtering hatemonger who seemed to actually believe all the ridiculously stupid propaganda about Democrats being worse than Republicans. What the fuck. Snap out of it! And kiss my ass as well.

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
90. From what friends who watch Cenk tell me ....
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 05:07 PM
Jan 2017

He doesn't even think that ruskies were involved at ALL in what happened with Hillary losing the presidency.

IF that's what he believes, then he can miss me with that. Also, not thinking that Bernie wouldn't have suffered the same fate with the ruskies or with voter disenfranchisement/voter suppression, then he is crazy and can kiss my fanny too. Like the GOP would have played "nice" with Bernie, who never was vetted at ALL.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
91. Ugh.
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 05:22 PM
Jan 2017

He's a loud mouthed asshat.

I've never forgotten that airline video he aired...thinking he looked good in it I guess. He looked like the asshole he is.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
96. He was a Trump surrogate.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 05:17 PM
Jan 2017

He found a special and aggressive group to pander to. No different than HA Goodman. Some will always be willing to take advantage of others ignorance in the name of money.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
99. No he wasn't. Your power to conflate justified criticism, even distrust of our whole system, to
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 03:00 AM
Jan 2017

being in support of or assisting Trump, who is clearly a sociopathic pinnacle of American Capitalistic disfunction the likes of which The Young Turks rail about, doesn't really have reach beyond the echo chamber.

BTW, if he were in it for the money first, he could have just been more of a "team player" at MSNBC. They just wanted him to lay off a little...they just wanted him to understand that they were insiders there, not rabble-rousers.



 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
97. Denial is strong around here
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 07:11 PM
Jan 2017

Seems like it is much easier to blame every single thing and externalize all cause for Clinton's defeat rather than some hard to admit truths that Clinton failed at securing victory.

What caused more damage the Clinton campaign? Criticism by Cenk Uygur that was probably never heard by the majority of Americans or Clinton's deplorables comment?

It isn't TYT's fault. Clinton ran a failed campaign and we are all paying the price.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
98. It's an odd time we live in
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:36 AM
Jan 2017

The left now consider Glenn Beck our friend while we hate Cenk Uygur. Before the election, people here were even trashing Dan Rather. I prefer the likes of Uygur and Rather to Beck.

BigDemVoter

(4,553 posts)
118. Fuck him.
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 12:35 AM
Jan 2017

I may agree with him on many points, but fuck him just the same. I got so goddamned tired of his negative bullshit about HRC. I hope he's happy now.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cenk Uygur can kiss my as...