Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 06:55 PM Jan 2017

Can Senators in Committees put a hold on nominees?

Franken just discovered that the ignorant woman DeVos doesn't understand the difference between growth and proficiency. That her family has supported conversion therapy for LGBT kids. Sanders brought up that her family has given $200 million dollars to the Republicans and that she wouldn't be sitting there if they hadn't.

And Sen. Alexander is only allowing them a few minutes of questions. Franken is hopping mad. Can they put a hold on this?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

skylucy

(3,865 posts)
1. Thanks for posting. Couldn't bring myself to watch the hearings because DeVos makes me
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 07:01 PM
Jan 2017

so disgusted and angry, I didn't think it would be good for my health. At least the Dems are trying to get to the truth, although I fear that the GOPutin will eventually prevail and approve DeVos and the rest of Trump's deplorable picks.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
2. Yes, but the hold only lasts until the end of the term or unless a cloture motion
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 07:07 PM
Jan 2017

is passed.

drray23

(8,000 posts)
3. End of their term ?
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 07:17 PM
Jan 2017

That could be years. I do remember that some gop senators did that in the past when you could actually place secret holds. I think they changed it so it can no longer be secret.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
4. There are still open and closed holds.
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 07:20 PM
Jan 2017

But they can be overridden and given that the GOP has the votes any hold would be symbolic.

Phoenix61

(17,716 posts)
5. Ok, so it's symbolic
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 07:38 PM
Jan 2017

Why not do it? Sometimes you need to be like a mosquito. Why? Have you ever tried to sleep with a mosquito buzzing around? Being nice isn't going to change anything. I'm not sure anything would so why not irritate the heck out of them.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
9. I agree. My feeling is that the Democratic Senators
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 10:55 AM
Jan 2017

should put a hold on every nominee and go public with the exact reasons for the hold. The normal GOP tactic is the secret hold.

karynnj

(59,992 posts)
6. This could be a way to require 60 votes though
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 08:12 PM
Jan 2017

De Voss is so bad she might not have 60.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
11. DeVos "claims" at this time to support the idea of publci schools.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 10:59 AM
Jan 2017

Even though she has worked to defund them. If I were a Democratic Senator, I would put a public hold on her nomination and explain to the press exactly why I was doing so. The GOP still has the votes to confirm, but at least explain why there are concerns.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Can Senators in Committee...