Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:29 AM Jan 2017

They did DOWN BALLOT shit too...and YES I mean voting machines

As the trickle, trickle, trickle comes out, *slowly* but surely, is there any more doubt what happened here?

Not *ONLY* do I think they rigged elections...and I *am* going *there*...that they pulled some shit with our equipment...YEP...*there*...because research has shown that it wouldn't need to be all that big an operation *AND* considering they would have had help from one of our political parties...yep.

I also think they hacked DU.

To the R S T L N E ers:

I know, I know, I know. There is no possible way *any* of our machines *anywhere* could be hacked. It would take thousands upon millions of people to do it, and they would have to do it in the plain light of day, and there aren't enough hours in that day to accomplish what I am saying. Someone here voted in Michigan, and they can tell you firsthand that no machines were hacked...and some places even had monitors from both parties there as witnesses. Nothing could *possibly* be hacked, mkay? Why isn't Hillary saying it was hacked? Why didn't Obama? ***YAWN*** trickle, trickle, trickle. Drip, drip, drip.

DU just isn't BIG ENOUGH, or important enough for any Russians/KGOPB to waste their precious time on. Oh, but *even* suggesting that they finagled voting machines UNDERMINES OUR ENTIRE REPUBLIC, because we are DU and people come here for their news (aside: try to have it both ways much?)

I will not play politics while they play war.

That shit has gone on long enough.


69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They did DOWN BALLOT shit too...and YES I mean voting machines (Original Post) LaydeeBug Jan 2017 OP
ALCOA! Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #1
Head in the sand much? LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #2
Not at all, I just tend not to jump to conclusions Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #20
Oh, you are certainly jumping to conclusions... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #27
PWD? nt Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #29
Another kick?? Why THANKS AGAIN! LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #40
The projection is astounding, isn't it? dionysus Jan 2017 #43
It *absolutely* IS LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #44
Where's reel 2? dionysus Jan 2017 #47
with the infallable never can be hacked voting machines, bless your heart LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #56
Indeed. Where have I seen projection like that before? nt Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #53
Where indeed LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #55
I am open to this possibility, but the problem is there's no hard evidence for this Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #3
They cheat and will always cheat. We outnumber them so that's the only way they can "win" brush Jan 2017 #4
I know, and they control the fucking media too Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #5
And that, in a nutshell is how they won. Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #7
I think our number 1 goal has to be to get control of the media Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #14
Indeed. Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #16
yeah... that takes real money and patience Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #19
prove it. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #41
Prove it? melman Jan 2017 #49
Just dishing what I'm served. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #54
Oh, don't get me wrong, I don't think they JUST tampered with machines... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #9
It's actually the same as the Trump strategy forjusticethunders Jan 2017 #25
Yep. And pretending one thing is 'off the table' or 'impossible' is head in the sand folly. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #28
I'm not 100% there was direct hacking of machines forjusticethunders Jan 2017 #35
Honestly, that's where I am, but because I have worked a LOT of elections LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #59
Several math whizzes advised Sec Clinton TheDebbieDee Jan 2017 #10
It was all so dizzying...we weren't expecting espionage. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #12
+1, now I think the Stein recount was a blocking move to keep HRC from doing such after all uponit7771 Jan 2017 #61
The hard evidence is they hacked state and local electoral boards were the machines are set... uponit7771 Jan 2017 #60
and that evidence is where? Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #63
That's were the machines are set, they don't have to hack individual machines when they can hack uponit7771 Jan 2017 #66
maybe this is what cummings was talking about. mopinko Jan 2017 #6
That's my point. If you've worked elections before... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #13
i have worked elections. it would be so fucking easy. mopinko Jan 2017 #15
Yep. And to act like it is out of the question, or that we have to provide THEM LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #30
+1, and all states that enacted VSM to lower counts in "urban" areas... those fuckers uponit7771 Jan 2017 #62
I agree with you. The complacency and the refusal to even consider that our machines had been BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #8
THANK YOU FOR THIS. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #11
No need to thank me. I thank YOU. Fighters should be admired, not excoriated. BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #17
Holy WOW! Just read this. Thank you for you LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #45
THIS 2naSalit Jan 2017 #18
Just mucking with them so they didn't work would be enough. LisaM Jan 2017 #33
+1, exactly... they didn't need a huge operation just a "big enough" operation to hide uponit7771 Jan 2017 #64
This, this, this...why they are so positive nothing happened is astounding. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #69
Never get tired of posting this: triron Jan 2017 #34
If his analysis brings you comfort that our way of voting is pretty much flawless, then I'm happy BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #39
You're kidding me? triron Jan 2017 #57
So why aren't President Obama, VP Biden, Pelosi, Schumer and other prominent Democrats Lurks Often Jan 2017 #21
That is exactly what I have been wondering since the story of the big russian conspiracy broke m-lekktor Jan 2017 #22
Or this isn't nearly as much there as some would like you to believe Lurks Often Jan 2017 #23
They're all in on it! dionysus Jan 2017 #46
Damn Straight! Lurks Often Jan 2017 #48
Republicans kenfrequed Jan 2017 #24
Nope. I think it was coordinated...and you're right, the GOP pulled this shit in Ohion 2004 LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #31
There is just no evidence for it kenfrequed Jan 2017 #36
As I've said before, SOMETHING happened on election day. hamsterjill Jan 2017 #26
exactly. This. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #32
It was unspeakable. hamsterjill Jan 2017 #38
Yes, LB!! After all of Putin's efforts - Hillary still led in all the polls on election eve... ElementaryPenguin Jan 2017 #37
No proof, combined with no proper punctuation, does not prove election fraud. dionysus Jan 2017 #42
. justburnitall Jan 2017 #52
Your insistence that there is no proof flies in the face of the news... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #58
The report says they hacked state and local electoral boards, if that's not "proof" enough then ... uponit7771 Jan 2017 #65
The mere fact that one is SLOW to connect the dots - ElementaryPenguin Jan 2017 #67
Rude. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #68
Not a doubt in my mind. ucrdem Jan 2017 #50
Got your back jack... K&R fleabiscuit Jan 2017 #51
 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
20. Not at all, I just tend not to jump to conclusions
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 01:22 PM
Jan 2017

when there's no evidence to support my assertions. YMMV

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
27. Oh, you are certainly jumping to conclusions...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:41 PM
Jan 2017

but then again...that won't stop you.

Thanks for the kick though. Appreciate it.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
3. I am open to this possibility, but the problem is there's no hard evidence for this
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:39 AM
Jan 2017

and no expert I've seen thinks this is what happened.

The great thing about the GOP is they have many ways of fucking with elections. I think vote suppression played a huge role myself.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
7. And that, in a nutshell is how they won.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:49 AM
Jan 2017

Voter suppression and media manipulation. Add in some Russian collusion, and you've got a recipe for a Trump presidency.

No tampering with the vote. Why bother when you can manipulate the people via the media while blocking "undesirables" from voting?

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
14. I think our number 1 goal has to be to get control of the media
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 12:03 PM
Jan 2017

but I don't see enough being done on this. We're just propping up the same evil and stupid corporate media that helped Trump.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
16. Indeed.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 12:08 PM
Jan 2017

I'd like to see a return of actual investigative journalism. Not news reports on some asshole's Twitter feed or cute cat videos on YouTube (I'm looking at you CNN).

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
54. Just dishing what I'm served.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:24 PM
Jan 2017

And I *promise* that will keep happening.

I speak my mind and shit

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
9. Oh, don't get me wrong, I don't think they JUST tampered with machines...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:52 AM
Jan 2017

But I have worked elections since 1986, and I know damn well that they CAN.

This was a coordinated effort involving all of those things.

 

forjusticethunders

(1,151 posts)
25. It's actually the same as the Trump strategy
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:26 PM
Jan 2017

Be SO offensive, so deplorable, so awful, so incompetent on so many fronts that it's impossible to defend against coherently.

It's basically political Deep Operations.

 

forjusticethunders

(1,151 posts)
35. I'm not 100% there was direct hacking of machines
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 03:18 PM
Jan 2017

But I'm not at all convinced there wasn't. The thing is that even if they tried and failed to hack the election, or didn't make enough of an effort, it still creates another front to defend. You have to defend against Russian interference, fake news, the awful shit Trump is actually doing, CrossCheck his appointments, his thuggish supporters attacking people, etc etc.

Also you don't have to change a single actual vote. Just make sure enough of them don't work, like in Detroit. The uncertainty to the method is another front to defend, because you don't know *what* actually happened.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
59. Honestly, that's where I am, but because I have worked a LOT of elections
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:14 PM
Jan 2017

I *know* they can be hacked, and pretending they are infallible, that it couldn't happen...that it didn't happen, is putting your head in the sand.

And pretending that even *mentioning* this somehow subverts future votes is FUCKING JOKE, considering how much them actually DOING this does.

It's funny how when the exit polls don't jive, it is always the KGOPB candidate that benefits.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
10. Several math whizzes advised Sec Clinton
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:53 AM
Jan 2017

To ask for recounts in a few states because the vote tallies were out if whack! This was around the same time that Jill Stein was raising funds to finance recounts...

uponit7771

(91,748 posts)
61. +1, now I think the Stein recount was a blocking move to keep HRC from doing such after all
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 07:20 AM
Jan 2017

... the Russia info came out I don't trust Stein no further I can throw her with a broke arm

uponit7771

(91,748 posts)
60. The hard evidence is they hacked state and local electoral boards were the machines are set...
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 07:19 AM
Jan 2017

... if that's not hard enough evidence I don't know what is

uponit7771

(91,748 posts)
66. That's were the machines are set, they don't have to hack individual machines when they can hack
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 07:32 AM
Jan 2017

... were the individual machines are set.

Either way, its not a rational thought to believe they hacked into the state and local electoral boards ... looked at the data and then said "fuck it, lets leave this here"...

Not believing that for a second

mopinko

(71,798 posts)
6. maybe this is what cummings was talking about.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:48 AM
Jan 2017

i do disagree w the idea that we are not big enough. we are.
we have sprouted dozens of hater sites. they are surely inhabited by real trolls.

but the numbers are just tooooo fishy. 70k votes in 3 states? piece of cake.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
13. That's my point. If you've worked elections before...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:56 AM
Jan 2017

if there are some GOPers that thought they were serving their country, or just needed some cash...it is even silly to suggest it couldn't happen.

But here we are...

mopinko

(71,798 posts)
15. i have worked elections. it would be so fucking easy.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 12:06 PM
Jan 2017

here 2 judges have to deliver the materials. soooo easy for them to take a short detour on the way to the collection points.

here you transmit the results as a part of the close out. i have no idea how widespread that is. and even w that check, how likely is it that any given precinct would be cross checked? it should be automatic, but it aint.

i've attended audits, too. those little "oops" result get papered over quickly.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
30. Yep. And to act like it is out of the question, or that we have to provide THEM
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:45 PM
Jan 2017

with hard evidence is pissing in the wind.

It is not ONLY conceivable that they did this, it is inconceivable to ignore the possibility.

Fuck that, and the horse it rode it on

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
8. I agree with you. The complacency and the refusal to even consider that our machines had been
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:51 AM
Jan 2017

hacked in favor of Republicans and tRump, tells me what a bunch of obedient sheeple too many have become. This is what the GOP and other anti-American, anti-democratic groups are banking on: American disbelief and fear of "rocking the boat". It's why they WIN. As they say, the lie travels halfway around the world before the truth catches up, right?

The ONLY people in the world who disses conspiracy theories are Americans in the United States. ALL OTHER democracies actually believe: where there's smoke, there's got to be fire, and that it's something that needs to be looked deeper into until such time hard evidence shows otherwise.

Here? You get a 'meh' from so-called Liberals who believe that conspiracy theories are synonymous with fairy tales - when time and time again, decades later, these original "conspiracy theories" get the hard evidence and is immediately brushed under the rug. Then again, by that time, the damage has already been done.

Thank you for keeping up the fight, LaydeeBug. YOU are a true American patriot in heart and soul.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
17. No need to thank me. I thank YOU. Fighters should be admired, not excoriated.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 12:13 PM
Jan 2017

You are a fighter and a true American patriot, and it needs to be said more around here.

I've been reading your posts for some time and they are filled with the food-for-thought we ALL should listen to and research, not dismiss right off bat. I don't understand why not more people are praising you for your courage to ask the hard questions. Well, I for one, do.

Thank you for keeping up the fight, LaydeeBug.

LisaM

(28,594 posts)
33. Just mucking with them so they didn't work would be enough.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:54 PM
Jan 2017

How many complaints were there about equipment in Detroit? You can hack without changing the votes. Break enough machines, make the lines long enough - voila, discouraged voters. And it doesn't take that many.

I'm not ruling out anything at this point. There are too many people upset at the outcome of the election to make me think that this is by any means the will of the people.

I know there are many suppression tactics, and frankly, the GOP doesn't mind employing them all.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
39. If his analysis brings you comfort that our way of voting is pretty much flawless, then I'm happy
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 05:23 PM
Jan 2017

for you.

We'll know in about a decade, maybe more, if that analysis is correct or flawed, won't we?

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
22. That is exactly what I have been wondering since the story of the big russian conspiracy broke
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 01:47 PM
Jan 2017

and which makes me hesitant to get behind these CIA planted talking points. You'd think the powers that be would be more up in arms about things!

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
24. Republicans
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:23 PM
Jan 2017

Why the hell are we pretending that Russia fielded agents all over America at every district to make Republicans win, when republicans tend to just do this on their own EVERY FRIGGING ELECTION YEAR!

Have Democrats lost their minds?

I'm serious, I have ranted and raved about hackable voting machines and lack of a paper-trail for years (ever since reading The Best Democracy Money Can Buy).

Did any of you read John Conyers report from 2005 (about the 2004 election) regarding what occurred in Ohio?

And despite plenty of evidence that the GOP was planning on swiping this thing (Crosscheck anyone?) a large number of Democrats have decided to make this all about Russia when there has been absolutely no evidence of them doing anything more than maybe releasing emails.

A new Red Scare only exists to force us into spending more on Defense and intelligence to prove our loyalty and drive up deficits which will be paid for in cuts to health and human services. The blowback to this is going to be intensely stupid and self injurious, particularly to progressives who will get edged out by Democrats that are Hawkish on Russia.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
31. Nope. I think it was coordinated...and you're right, the GOP pulled this shit in Ohion 2004
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:48 PM
Jan 2017

with Ken Blackwell aiding them...and this time around, they had aid from Russia, in addition to their already well placed minions.

I am saying this election was hacked though. Down ballot too.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
36. There is just no evidence for it
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 03:46 PM
Jan 2017

The republicans never needed that much coordination to pull it off. They have been doing it for decades.

Employ Occams razor on this thing.

They didn't need Russia's help with any of this so what functional role would Russian support have been?

hamsterjill

(15,507 posts)
26. As I've said before, SOMETHING happened on election day.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:30 PM
Jan 2017

I don't pretend to be savvy enough to know what the hell the Russians, the Trump camp and/or others did, but I know in my gut that SOMETHING happened. I will go to my grave thinking this because I live and work around all Republicans. Even THEY were insistent that Hillary was going to win. Even THEY saw what a dumbass, inept jackass Donald Trump was.

I can't wait for the first time that Hillary speaks out.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
32. exactly. This.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 02:49 PM
Jan 2017

except I am not waiting for Hillary to speak out. What happened to her was unspeakable.

hamsterjill

(15,507 posts)
38. It was unspeakable.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 04:53 PM
Jan 2017

But the Clintons still have some power and respect globally, and it is my hope that will be a benefit for Hillary to know what exactly happened. You know she will ultimately be asked, and you know she will answer. Her answer will be very interesting to me.

ElementaryPenguin

(7,846 posts)
37. Yes, LB!! After all of Putin's efforts - Hillary still led in all the polls on election eve...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 04:10 PM
Jan 2017

So, are you telling me Putin would've been content to have finished a closer than previously expected 2nd? (with a $1/2 trillion deal with Exxon on the line).

Sure.

As Trump said himself in Wisconsin (during his victory lap) that he was losing "bigly" in the exit polls - and explained to his wife that he had lost - and he was going to be embarrassed to see the vote tallies coming in - and what was he going to do career-wise.

But what happens? The margin of error is exceeded always in Trump's favor - in 23 of the 25 states contested states with exit polls (the same odds as flipping heads 23 times in 25 flips!!

Would Obama have become the 1st President in history to use the "hot-line" to contact a Russian leader and warn Putin that he wouldn't rule out even a military response if he hacked the election results?? Do you think he would've done that - risk WWIII - even hadn't believed Russia had the ability to hack the vote totals? Would he have done that simply to ward off another Hillary email dump??

Princeton Univ. was asked if the Russians could do this and they said it would child's play for them. The vote tabulators were found to be ultimately connected online (contrary to what Comey said) and the also had cellular connectivity.

The Russians have said they were in contact with the Trump camp throughout - they could have easily indicated which counties and precincts needed to be hacked. And the down ballots were crucial too to maintain control the Senate, which they were likely to lose.

Again, in time, this will leak out. It isn't information the Obama administration was going to be able to just dump on the public and expect everyone to accept - and with our recount system - there wasn't enough time to walk it back - we were basically stuck with this - and the story had to be limited to the obvious intentional hacking of the election the Russians were doing to influence the election and assist Trump. The investigations have been started - and many will be surprised to see that that dossier on Trump is far from the only thing Putin has hanging over his head. He has the collusion of him and his team with the Russians - the most hostile foreign power their is - to steal the Presidential power. TREASON. You can just imagine what sentence a conviction in these circumstances might bring. The name Benedict Arnold would probably be displaced and forgotten in American History overnight.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
42. No proof, combined with no proper punctuation, does not prove election fraud.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 06:06 PM
Jan 2017

Rather than admit our candidate had real flaws, you claim fraid, with absolutely zero proof.

It's a good way to feel about yourself, but it's a recipe for continued losses.

According to some here we win 100% of elections, tjey were just all stolen.

It's a shortcut for thinking.

justburnitall

(10 posts)
52. .
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 06:54 PM
Jan 2017

Whatever! You know the only way Drumpf won the election was due to cheating!! Nobody liked him, just small town inbreds who barely vote anyways.

All I saw around here was Hil signs and stickers.....even people who didn't feel she was the greatest candidate still were ready to vote in the election to keep tangerine man out.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
58. Your insistence that there is no proof flies in the face of the news...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:34 PM
Jan 2017

And not addressing the coordinated effort that was launched upon us ALLOWS them to do it over and over again.

They've been saying the media is liberal for so long that our populace actually believes it, and they're conservative.

You can put your head in the sand all you want.

This was HACKED, STUFFED, CHEATED, STOLEN, and you can't prove it wasn't.

uponit7771

(91,748 posts)
65. The report says they hacked state and local electoral boards, if that's not "proof" enough then ...
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 07:26 AM
Jan 2017

... nothing will be.

I'm not going to believe they hacked those boards, looked at the data and said fuck it... lets just go somewhere else.

That's not rational conclusion relative to the other data regarding hacking

ElementaryPenguin

(7,846 posts)
67. The mere fact that one is SLOW to connect the dots -
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 09:47 AM
Jan 2017

DOES NOT DISPROVE ANYTHING!! (Nor does a lack of appreciation for unorthodox punctuation!.!.!.!.!.!)


ucrdem

(15,703 posts)
50. Not a doubt in my mind.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 06:48 PM
Jan 2017

How it happens that candidates quick to claim the system is rigged fall silent on this point I can't explain.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»They did DOWN BALLOT shit...