Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 02:11 AM Sep 2012

All tactics diminish in effectiveness with continued use

Reposted from GD

I got to thinking about an old piece of Saul alinsky advice after reading the article cited below.

Alinsky said that if you were sitting in at corporate offices and started running into comfortable chairs and snacks set out for the protesters, it was time to switch to a new tactic.

Lots of other examples. The Battle in Seattle in 1999 was very effective in calling attention to corporate trade agreements. What happened at subsequent meetings? The 1% caught on and started holding their meetings in comparatively inaccessible places.

When OWS started claiming public space by extended camping, the public conversation changed from the deficit to income inequality. However, it just isn't possible to camp out forever.

Our side has most of the imagination--we just have to start using it more.

http://www.nationofchange.org/how-not-protest-rnc-1346504969

Cultural activists, like the Yes Men, keep challenging us to think more creatively. At a training I led for their Yes Labs program, Yes Men co-founder Andy Bichlbaum told me, “If an action doesn’t make you laugh or gasp, we have to throw it out.”

The RNC protesters took a shot at it by melting huge chunks of ice written as “the middle-class.” But it doesn’t make me laugh or gasp. If inspiring is a goal, ho-hum actions should be stricken from our toolbox.

Too often, however, activists are stuck repeating the tactics they know. They then begrudge the media, or their comrades, or potential allies, for not getting it. At a direct action workshop I co-led with George Lakey in South Korea, we heard young movement activists lamenting that the press stopped covering their movement’s tactic: public suicides in the middle of a protest. How could the media and their allies be so callous?

<snip>

When it comes down to it, effective direct action doesn’t lie in tactics that are merely about expressing our minds and making a public spectacle; it is in our ability to organize people to break social scripts.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All tactics diminish in effectiveness with continued use (Original Post) eridani Sep 2012 OP
Thanks! very! much for this. patrice Sep 2012 #1
If the RNC or DNC said Downwinder Sep 2012 #2
That is what Pasadena wisely did with the Rose Bowl. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #3

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
2. If the RNC or DNC said
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 02:42 AM
Sep 2012

"have your parade, we will make it part of the festivities," it would save a lot of security expense.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
3. That is what Pasadena wisely did with the Rose Bowl.
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 02:46 AM
Sep 2012

After the Rose Bowl parade, Occupy was allowed to assemble at a square and join for entertainment, laughs and a good time.

The police stood watchfully by, nodded and laughed with the protestors. A good time was had by all, and I think that included the police. They smiled as we left.

What a harmless bunch we were -- singing folk songs and meeting together.

Why all the drama by authorities? Maybe it makes them feel important.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»All tactics diminish in e...