Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 11:11 PM Feb 2013

California Orders Wal-Mart Warehouse to Pay $1.1 Million in Stolen Wages

http://october2011.org/blogs/kevin-zeese/california-orders-wal-mart-warehouse-pay-11-million-stolen-wages

The state of California has ordered a Southern California merchandise-processing warehouse to pay 865 workers more than $1 million in stolen wages.

Workers at Quetico, LLC, a warehouse complex in Chino, Calif., are responsible for labeling, tagging and packing apparel and shoes for major retailers including Wal-Mart, Levi's, Maidenform and Puma. On Monday, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement cited the complex for more than $1.1 million in back wages and unpaid overtime, plus an additional $200,000 in penalties.

Workers last year informed the Warehouse Worker Resource Center that they were being denied pay for time worked, made to work through lunch and threatened with termination if they complained. The Quetico warehouse has been cited in the last year by multiple state agencies for violations, including unsafe working conditions and retaliation against workers who requested to be paid for missing wages.

The wage theft ruling is a significant victory for Warehouse Workers United, which has led a movement to hold Wal-Mart responsible for warehouse working conditions under the company's subcontractors. Dozens, if not hundreds of workers from other Wal-Mart warehouse locations—including more facilities in California, stores in Seattle and Dallas, and another outside of Chicago—went on strike late last year to protest poor working conditions and retaliation against workers who complained about safety hazards.

(More at the link.)
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Orders Wal-Mart Warehouse to Pay $1.1 Million in Stolen Wages (Original Post) Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 OP
Good for the state of California! n/t Lady Freedom Returns Feb 2013 #1
A definite step in the right direction. PDJane Feb 2013 #2
drop in the ocean for these thieves. progressoid Feb 2013 #3
Agree xxqqqzme Feb 2013 #4
Betcha since it was in Chino they figured they could get away with it.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #5
That's more money than I have slackmaster Feb 2013 #6
Sorry but this is a BS feel good ruling. cstanleytech Feb 2013 #7
I worked for Walmart for four years and I was denied overtime many times. Apophis Feb 2013 #8
The ruling should have been higher... ReRe Feb 2013 #9
Cons are surely livid over hearing this Populist_Prole Feb 2013 #10
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
5. Betcha since it was in Chino they figured they could get away with it....
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 12:36 AM
Feb 2013

Next thing you know they'll move to Boyle Heights.

cstanleytech

(26,805 posts)
7. Sorry but this is a BS feel good ruling.
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 01:12 AM
Feb 2013

Why do I say that? Because this will really do nothing to stop the practice because its profitable for companies to do this kind of stuff and it will continue until they are shown that its not profitable which will only happen if the fines for this type of stuff are stiffened enough to where there is no profit in doing it.

 

Apophis

(1,407 posts)
8. I worked for Walmart for four years and I was denied overtime many times.
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 01:21 AM
Feb 2013

They would makes stay sometimes 2 to 3 hours past our scheduled shift then cut those overtime hours by taking extended lunch breaks. I was forced to quit after I demanded that they should have paid me what I was owed.

ReRe

(10,611 posts)
9. The ruling should have been higher...
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 01:54 AM
Feb 2013
K&R

... That amount is a spit-in-the-wind over the shoulder of Wal-Mart. Should have been at least ten times as much. Just saying...

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
10. Cons are surely livid over hearing this
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 02:11 AM
Feb 2013

They put Walmart on such a pedestal. I'm not quite sure if it's because they really like the place or because the right wing noise machine say they should. I know a few cons who are so partisan and so petty that they enjoy holding the mirror reverse opposite of anything that seems even remotely pro-labor.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»California Orders Wal-Mar...