Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:48 PM Feb 2013

H.R. 748 would require all persons in the US 18-25 to perform 'national service'

This bill has only just begun its path and the linked tracking site gives it exceedingly slim chance of survival, but WTF regardless. Posse Comitatus. I don't know if this site is RWNJ.

Hell☠Fawkin☠Bound ‏@HellFawker

H.R. 748 would require all persons in the US 18-25 to perform 'national service' http://fb.me/1oT8QSyeO


http://www.examiner.com/article/h-r-748-would-require-all-persons-the-us-18-25-to-perform-national-service

There has been speculation regarding President Obama’s “citizen army”. In 2008, President Obama made statements regarding a “civilian national security force”. Since that day, many have been curious as to what President Obama had in mind when he made that statement. Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY13) may have just given a bit of insight into what was meant when he introduced H.R. 748 last week.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” Obama said as a candidate in 2008.

H.R. 748 would require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 25 to perform “national service”. These persons in the United States would either serve the country as a member of uniformed services or as civilian service. The civilian service could be served with a Federal, State, or local government program. The local government programs include community-based organizations. H.R. 748 would “authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, to provide for the registration of women under the Military Selective Service Act, and for other purposes”

H.R. 748 was introduced on Feb. 14, 2013 and was referred to the House Armed Services Committee the same day. The chair of the committee, Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA) will determine whether the bill will move past the committee stage. Opponents and of H.R. 748 are being encouraged to call Rep. McKeon and tell him how they feel about the bill, (202) 225-1956, (661) 274-9688, (661) 254-2111. They are also encouraged to send him tweets and post on his Facebook page. Many are also contacting Rep. Rangel by calling him, (202) 225-4365, tweeting him, and posting on his Facebook page.

(More at the link.)


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
H.R. 748 would require all persons in the US 18-25 to perform 'national service' (Original Post) Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 OP
Required service can be civilian service, like the CCC? NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #1
I see this as a good thing... TheProgressive Feb 2013 #2
The Bush/Obama Trend has been anything BUT honorable and patriotic. This stinks of enforcers. n/t Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #3
With the emphasis on security, I'm not getting a good feeling about it. snot Feb 2013 #4
Full employment n/t PADemD Feb 2013 #5
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Required service can be civilian service, like the CCC?
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:53 PM
Feb 2013

I don't know if I have a problem with that.

I'm thinking FDR: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=60824

But maybe this is something completely different.

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
2. I see this as a good thing...
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:54 PM
Feb 2013

Some sort of national service after you graduate high school...

Pays for college...and provides a national service.

Seems like an honorable and patriotic program.

snot

(10,702 posts)
4. With the emphasis on security, I'm not getting a good feeling about it.
Sat Feb 23, 2013, 01:18 AM
Feb 2013

We don't need more security; we're frisked and surveilled enough already.

What we need are jobs and a decent chance in life.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»H.R. 748 would require al...