But it's not hard to find given the subject matter. Posted any other day, I might take great offense to it. Today, it's just an April Fool's joke.

These are the titles of some of her latest blog posts:

20 Feminist Headlines that would count as hate speech if they were written about Jews
5 Feminist Heroes who were actually terrible people
5 Ways Feminists are Literally Like Nazis
6 Times Feminists were Whiny, Joyless Shrews in 2014

Absolutely no agenda there, amirite?

Cannot believe this shit is posted on DU, this does not align with my politics whatsoever.

apparently, I need to vomit one more time today.

What a load of crap.

I can't believe it's allowed to stand, but then again, this site hasn't cared much about women or PoC, at least in the time I've been here.

are wasting their time.

I'd appreciate a PM as well

I love your state. They stepped up once again, I saw this morning

else right wa did that i read just this morning. i forget.

or give me a hint so I can find the thread?

I don't have my hazmat suit handy. Someone really should alert though.

to be anything other than what they are.

consequences.

Rights blacks have that whites don't; or rights LGBT have that straights don't. They would be awful, extreme right-wing hate speech, which is precisely what the same argument about women having more rights that men is. They are the equivalent to the KKK and Mike Pence, and should be seen as exactly that. There is nothing liberal, left, moderate, or acceptable about such ideas and they don't belong anywhere on a site for Democrats.

I don't get in for the pissing contest going on in GD about women's vs. LGBGT rights. I find it off-putting. But the fact is there is far too much tolerance of hate speech about women. Anyone who articulates such a view should be treated as the social pariah they are.

Note: I still have not seen the DU thread in question, nor do I intend to. Nor do I know who the OP is. I might only hazard a guess. Therefore my comments are not directed at any DUer.

The fact is MRAS and those who advance similar ideas advertise the fact they are complete and total losers who can't compete in a world where women disproportionately live in poverty and 1/3 of us are subject to violence and rape. They won't be happy until that number is 100 percent, and no woman can support herself. I tangled with one such character on DI who completely lost it in a fit of anger that a few women in Hollywood are wealthy. The idea that a woman anywhere was wealthy meant we had too much because we by virtue of birth deserve to have and be less. I'll link to that thread so people can get a sense of the ideas and individuals we are talking about.
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=82177 (That was all because I commented that the greatest inequalities in education relate to race and class).
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=82847

Last edited Wed Apr 1, 2015, 06:37 PM - Edit history (1)

I was on the jury .... even those that voted to leave did NOT support the post (I voted to HIDE)

I corrected my post .... thank you BB (I interchanged LOCKED/ HIDDEN and until BB pointed it out, my post didn't make a lot of sense)

Sorry for any confusion .... a jury voted to hide