Another good guy with a gun foils a home invasion!
CINCINNATI (AP) Police in Cincinnati say a man has fatally shot his 14-year-old son in their home, thinking he was an intruder.
Police say the man thought his son had caught the bus for school Tuesday morning, but the teen returned home soon afterward. Police say the man heard a noise in the basement and checked on it with a gun in his hand. Police say the father fired after apparently being startled, hitting the boy in the neck.
Authorities say the father called 911 and the boy was taken to Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, where he died Tuesday morning.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/cincinnati-man-kills-son-intruder
randys1
(16,286 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)flamin lib
(14,559 posts)That is such a better outcome, right? Uh, no. How about if the father didn't have a gun and didn't carry the thoughts of life saving self grandeur that lurk in minds of people in the gun culture? Would that be a better outcome?
Aristus
(68,328 posts)A switch or a catch the user can flip on or off as needed to ensure that the gun does not fire unless absolutely needed, and does not harm someone unintentionally. I think that would change the nature of gun culture as we know it...
Jerry442
(1,265 posts)Unbeknown to the owner, of course.
-none
(1,884 posts)The problem is it seldom used because of their constant need to to be able to defend themselves at a moments notice.
Moving that lever with their thumb before firing might take too long.
Aristus
(68,328 posts)and murdering our son...
Gunfucks are such idiots...
hlthe2b
(106,340 posts)them... The thought I could kill/injure a loved one--or for me, even the thought of killing a complete stranger sends a sense of dread throughout. Is the sense of denial so fine honed in gun advocates that they can't even imagine feeling badly about shooting/injuriing/killing someone?
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)The attachment to the guns is much stronger than any individual life.
Heck, even the American Sniper widow would NEVER EVER consider that a gun caused her hubby's death. His death was tragic to her, no doubt, but she and he would die 1,000 times if it meant defending their right and the right of others to own guns.
No guns were harmed during this story.
Sancho
(9,103 posts)People Control, Not Gun Control
This is my generic response to gun threads where people are shot and killed by the dumb or criminal possession of guns. For the record, I grew up in the South and on military bases. I was taught about firearms as a child, and I grew up hunting, was a member of the NRA, and I still own guns. In the 70s, I dropped out of the NRA because they become more radical and less interested in safety and training. Some personal experiences where people I know were involved in shootings caused me to realize that anyone could obtain and posses a gun no matter how illogical it was for them to have a gun. Also, easy access to more powerful guns, guns in the hands of children, and guns that werent secured are out of control in our society. As such, heres what I now think ought to be the requirements to possess a gun. Im not debating the legal language, I just think its the reasonable way to stop the shootings. Notice, none of this restricts the type of guns sold. This is aimed at the people who shoot others, because its clear that they should never have had a gun.
1.) Anyone in possession of a gun (whether they own it or not) should have a regularly renewed license. If you want to call it a permit, certificate, or something else that's fine.
2.) To get a license, you should have a background check, and be examined by a professional for emotional and mental stability appropriate for gun possession. It might be appropriate to require that examination to be accompanied by references from family, friends, employers, etc. This check is not to subject you to a mental health diagnosis, just check on your superficial and apparent gun-worthyness.
3.) To get the license, you should be required to take a safety course and pass a test appropriate to the type of gun you want to use.
4.) To get a license, you should be over 21. Under 21, you could only use a gun under direct supervision of a licensed person and after obtaining a learners license. Your license might be restricted if you have children or criminals or other unsafe people living in your home. (If you want to argue 18 or 25 or some other age, fine. 21 makes sense to me.)
5.) If you possess a gun, you would have to carry a liability insurance policy specifically for gun ownership - and likely you would have to provide proof of appropriate storage, security, and whatever statistical reasons that emerge that would drive the costs and ability to get insurance.
6.) You could not purchase a gun or ammunition without a license, and purchases would have a waiting period.
7.) If you possess a gun without a license, you go to jail, the gun is impounded, and a judge will have to let you go (just like a DUI).
8.) No one should carry an unsecured gun (except in a locked case, unloaded) when outside of home. Guns should be secure when transporting to a shooting event without demonstrating a special need. Their license should indicate training and special carry circumstances beyond recreational shooting (security guard, etc.). If you are carrying your gun while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, you lose your gun and license.
9.) If you buy, sell, give away, or inherit a gun, your license information should be recorded.
10.) If you accidentally discharge your gun, commit a crime, get referred by a mental health professional, are served a restraining order, etc., you should lose your license and guns until reinstated by a serious relicensing process.
Most of you know that a license is no big deal. Besides a drivers license you need a license to fish, operate a boat, or many other activities. I realize these differ by state, but that is not a reason to let anyone without a bit of sense pack a semiautomatic weapon in public, on the roads, and in schools. I think we need to make it much harder for some people to have guns.