Wyldwolf has been around DU for a long time and in that time I have had several disagreements with him, but I am with him on the issue of gun control and I trust that he will be a fair host.

I do think that we need other hosts as well, I know Wyldwolf has expressed the same desire and I trust that he will stick to his word and work with any other hosts that are nominated to serve beside him.

I ask other members of this forum to give Wyldwolf your support so we can get a host in place to ensure this place does not become the Gungeon 2.

I also nominate you and the others listed, as well as grantcart.

I may be mistaken, but think he had interest.

I think it's a good host team and I support wyldwolf as lead host.

If added, I look forward to working as a team to develop boundaries and help maintain a safe haven for the support of Gun Control on DU.

Can I get a second?

100%

k&r

This sort of reminds me of when Opus was sent to the bathroom to ensure a swift nomination for VP of the Meadow Party but I still support it!

Guns are Lord! Arm everyone and everything!!!!

(just kidding)

Even though Robb is a dingbat, he's still one of the smartest DUers around.

I didn't get a response.

But I love the euphemism "host." A host who spends his or her time looking for infiltrators and neutralizing them. Can you imagine if Ridley Scott had titled his 1982 movie Lead Host instead of Blade Runner?

HAPPY ST. PATRICKS DAY

Allow me to add that I think this group is a good thing, and sorely needed around here.

A progressive dog supporting a wyld wolf? ah, I guess it makes sense!
I also support all the nominees I've seen, secmo, ww, to note, is this the primary or what?
Rand Paul just won yday a straw poll for president in 2016 I think; bad news for us it's rand paul, good news for us it's rand paul.

Is it possible to make a group by some qualification only? that is you need be prequalified to even post in it? and new members posts would need be prescreened for maybe 10 posts (like initial membership in DU) before they were allowed to post without screening? --- this screen might incur a 2 - 4 hour wait (to a day?), which would be lifted after the 10 posts if you were to be validated as OK, etc. The poster could still be later disqualified if he became offensive. Or new members on a 'conditional' basis.

I also have a concern however; a couple of 'pro gun' posts have been 'msg removed' when there isn't really anything so godawful about them. The actual posters likely would not get 'approved' under my suggestion above (hack might be forever 'conditional'), but even so, a few posts have been removed unfairly imo. I saw absolutely nothing objectionable about them (two so far).

Perhaps a triumvirate in hosting, like when the romans tried it I believe.

wyldwolf was on DU early this morning, I would bet he's gone to work and will be back later today.

thanks.