Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 10:42 PM Dec 2013

Pope Francis v. the free marketeers

Mark Silk

A few days after Ronald Reagan was reelected president in 1984, a committee of five American Catholic bishops released the first draft of a pastoral letter on the U.S. economy that, in the words of New York Times economics columnist Leonard Silk (aka my late father), ”reads like an assault on the Reagan Administration’s economic, social, foreign aid and military policies.”

Drawing on the Vatican’s longstanding critique of capitalism, the bishops themselves advocated policies to promote greater equality of income and wealth so long as there were ”poor, hungry and homeless people in our midst,” and, Dad wrote, they “excoriated national complacency over unemployment.” Contra the president’s full-throated free-market ideology, they were “skeptical about tales of the beauties of perfect competition or the beneficence of the invisible hand of the market.”

The bishops expected some criticism from conservative co-religionists, but what they got was more than they bargained for. Even before the draft was released, there appeared a critical letter from 29 lay Catholics led by the American Enterprise Institute’s Michael Novak and former Treasury Secretary William Simon, and the attacks didn’t let up. It was a significantly watered-down version that the entire bishops’ conference finally voted through in 1986.

Now, three decades later, comes Evangelii Gaudium (“The Joy of the Gospel”), Pope Francis’ extended redefinition of — and exhortation to the faithful to embrace — the so-called “New Evangelization.” What’s remarkable is how central the pope makes improving the lives of the poor to “the proclamation of the Gospel in today’s world.” As he conceives it, that means more than private charity: “an accumulation of small personal gestures to individuals in need, a kind of ‘charity à la carte,’ or a series of acts aimed solely at easing our conscience.” It also means more than supporting government welfare programs, which he calls “merely temporary responses.” The new pope’s New Evangelization entails an obligation to push for solutions to “the structural causes of poverty.”

http://marksilk.religionnews.com/2013/12/01/pope-francis-v-free-marketeers/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pope Francis v. the free marketeers (Original Post) hrmjustin Dec 2013 OP
There's a lot of difference between a pastoral letter from American No Vested Interest Dec 2013 #1

No Vested Interest

(5,196 posts)
1. There's a lot of difference between a pastoral letter from American
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:47 PM
Dec 2013

RC bishops and a proclamation from the Pope.

It's easy for Americana to disagree with American bishops, and many often do.

However, the Pope's words, which are not tailored for an American audience - indeed, the American RC is just a minority of the whole of the RCC- hold a lot more sway.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Pope Francis v. the free ...