Interfaith Group
Related: About this forumThe Rise of Religious "Nones" Indicates the End of Religion As We Know It
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-laderman/the-rise-of-religious-non_b_2913000.htmlGary Laderman
Chair of the Department of Religion, Emory University
The Rise of Religious "Nones" Indicates the End of Religion As We Know It
Posted: 03/20/2013 2:36 am
I have seen the future of religion in America, and its name is "none." Yet another survey just recently published and publicized is emphasizing what is now an undeniable trend on the American religious landscape: increasing, if not historic, numbers of Americans are claiming no religious affiliation when asked to state their religious identity, and more and more are embracing "spirituality" as an alternative religious brand that is not tradition-specific, but is more in line with the democratic spirit of individual tastes.
This surge of people not willing to associate with any faith tradition when asked by surveyors will certainly garner a great deal of attention: the faithful will cry the sky is falling, and the world is clearly coming to end with this movement away from traditional, authoritative religious institutions; political pundits will pounce on the figures indicating that a majority of these "nones" are on the liberal side of the political spectrum, and therefore are likely to exacerbate the cultural wars that have become so prominent since the rise of the Religious Right in the second half of the twentieth century; and the atheists will claim the upper hand in the ongoing battles with religious leaders who they believe have been deceiving and exploiting weak-minded sheep for far too long.
It is truly a fascinating time to be a scholar of American religion and see the dynamic, shape-shifting, and profoundly significant changes taking place in the 21st century. Is this a cultural moment signaling another "Great Awakening," a period of serious social and spiritual transformation associated with outbursts of revivalism and evangelicalism in colonial New England, the early national period soon after the American Revolution, the middle of the nineteenth century in expanding and diversifying urban areas, and for some the 1960s cultural revolutions during the tumultuous Vietnam War era?
My own take on the current moment is that this is not an "awakening" -- which is after all is associated with a revival of the Christian spirit and Americans returning to the church -- but a great cultural metamorphosis. If things continue to go in this direction into the future, religion will never look the same as it once did.
more at link
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)(it's about time)
cbayer
(146,218 posts)no irony allowed? OK.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)pinto
(106,886 posts)it was less a move away from any one religion but a move toward incorporating a spiritual aspect into her daily life. She belongs to a number of groups. Some decidedly and solely secular, some with a decidedly spiritual take on a secular life that includes those of an established faith tradition, atheists, agnostics and nones.
She made an interesting comment to me recently. Instead of exacerbating the cultural conflicts fueled by the religious right and played out in the political sphere, she feels her generation and the one younger than hers will increasingly make them irrelevant. They just aren't issues to them.
I found that a refreshingly optimistic point of view. And one that simple demographics support.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)My step-daughter is visiting right now. She has always considered herself to be atheist, but is now being confronted with the possible need to *convert* to Islam in order to gain acceptance by her new husband's family. Really, really tough decision, but the conversation with her has been enlightening.
I religion affiliation sometimes just a convenience? Is it wrong to *convert* when you don't really mean it?
pinto
(106,886 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)reminds me of the Sixties, without the revolutionary music and art. I'm not seeing the surge of creativity that went along with the individualist spirituality and the politics of that time.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)In the sixties-early seventies, it's was all about the gatherings, the movement, the cause, the protests.
People seem to be practicing or exercising their spirituality by themselves these days.
supernova
(39,345 posts)I think the present institutions, and I'm speaking of xtain ones since that's what I know, need a tear down and a replacing with something more community and universal-oriented, less hierarchical, flatter, more loosely defined organizations that can better serve the communities they are a part of rather than just reside there, and at worst simply extract $$$ from their members and take it to enrich coffers elsewhere.
I don't think the share of people who claim a connection to the divine are any smaller sect of the population than before, but my hope is that we will find healthier ways to express that in the community than "you're in my tribe; you're OK." "You're not in my tribe; you're NOT OK."
The whole idea of "worship" needs a rethink too. I'm a former Presbyterian (ordained Church Elder) and just knowing that the attributes of a church service haven't changed in 1000 years, and in my case since the Reformation, sets my teeth on edge. It's boring and not that relevant.
I could write a novel, but my point is.. I don't think our love of The Divine (however you want to define it) is going anywhere. It's just that our public expressions of it are fast becoming not useful or fullfilling.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)believers but pretty dramatic changes in how they choose to express, or not express, it.
U/U churches are doing well because they are attentive to the changing needs of this population, imo. Others needs to wake up or they will die off.