Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 09:25 AM Aug 2014

Richard Dawkins: ‘It Would Be Immoral’ to Give Birth to A Child with Down’s Syndrome

By Tina Nguyen | 8:28 pm, August 20th, 2014

Richard Dawkins inflamed the British internet last night when he suggested that it would be “immoral” to continue carrying a fetus to full term, if genetic screening proved that it carried the gene for Down’s Syndrome.

His suggestion came in response to a woman who didn’t know what she’d do if she were pregnant with a child with Down’s: “Abort it and try again,” he suggested. “It would be immoral to bring it into the world if you have the choice.”

With the advent of genetic screening, the practice is fairly common in England and Wales: The Telegraph estimates that nearly 1000 abortions due to Downs Syndrome are performed per year.

“Apparently I’m a horrid monster for recommending WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS to the great majority of Down Syndrome fetuses,” Dawkins tweeted much later, after the internet collectively exploded at him.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/richard-dawkins-it-would-be-immoral-to-give-birth-to-a-child-with-downs-syndrome/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Gee, what part of "woman's right to choose" does that obtuse individual not understand?
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:49 AM
Aug 2014

That whole "choice" thing is a two-way street, and loudmouths who don't have a womb in the game need to just step back.

His goal, plainly, is to offend people. I guess he's offended every parent of a DS child who loves their kid and doesn't have a problem with their genetic issues.

It's Not His Business.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
2. I think his friends should intervene with him and tell him to shut up now.
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:52 AM
Aug 2014

I hope no one defends this crap.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
3. Really--talk about stepping in it!!!
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 11:09 AM
Aug 2014

If the "Getting involved in matters of choice" misstep isn't sufficiently "paternalistic-offensive," the whole "eugenics" vibe is the foul icing on the cake.

This is just all kinds of WRONG!!!!!

I wonder if he'd like it if someone suggested he be fixed, so he doesn't pass on that poor judgment to any offspring....I'm sure he'd be "But...but...butting" all over the place!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. I think his sun is starting to set, and he needs drama to garner a bit more attention.
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 12:42 PM
Aug 2014

Outrageous remarks will ensure he gets a guest appearance on this show or that, and those are good for a couple of grand a pop.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
6. Oh, there are plenty of defenders in the Religion thread.
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 01:09 PM
Aug 2014

Although most of them are minimizing it or would rather talk about the Pope.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
7. That surprises me because they have called him out before when wrong.
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 01:10 PM
Aug 2014

This was just plain wrong this time.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Richard Dawkins: ‘It Woul...